Cargando…

Consecutive versus separate sessions of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for symptomatic choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND: Common bile duct (CBD) stones are a potentially life-threatening medical condition. Patients with proven CBD stones should undergo stone extraction. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether performing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ER...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benjaminov, Fabiana, Stein, Assaf, Lichtman, George, Pomeranz, Itamar, Konikoff, Fred M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23389062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2720-7
_version_ 1782270625048428544
author Benjaminov, Fabiana
Stein, Assaf
Lichtman, George
Pomeranz, Itamar
Konikoff, Fred M.
author_facet Benjaminov, Fabiana
Stein, Assaf
Lichtman, George
Pomeranz, Itamar
Konikoff, Fred M.
author_sort Benjaminov, Fabiana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Common bile duct (CBD) stones are a potentially life-threatening medical condition. Patients with proven CBD stones should undergo stone extraction. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether performing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for symptomatic CBD stones in a single session reduces complications related to postponing treatment due to separate EUS and ERCP sessions, and to assess the safety in both options. METHODS: A total of 151 patients with EUS-proven CBD stones, with subsequent ERCP, treated in our department between January 2005 and December 2011 were included. Complications related to the procedures or sedation and complications due to the CBD stones when EUS and ERCP were not performed in a single session were assessed and compared to complications when the two procedures were performed in one session. RESULTS: In total, 149 patients of the 151 (98.7 %) had a successful ERCP. Four (5 %) patients in the separate-session group (B) had a major complication compared to none in the single-session group (A) (p > 0.05). Group B received 14 % more midazolam during ERCP than group A (p < 0.05). No sedation-related complications were noted in either group. Eleven of the 80 patients in group B (13.8 %) experienced complications while waiting for ERCP compared to none in group A (p = 0.001, OR = 2.17, CI = 1.06–4. CONCLUSIONS: EUS and ERCP done in a single session proved to be safe, with no increase in sedation- or procedure-related complications. Postponing treatment for symptomatic CBD stones exposes the patient to biliary complications, especially cholangitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3661077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36610772013-05-22 Consecutive versus separate sessions of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for symptomatic choledocholithiasis Benjaminov, Fabiana Stein, Assaf Lichtman, George Pomeranz, Itamar Konikoff, Fred M. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Common bile duct (CBD) stones are a potentially life-threatening medical condition. Patients with proven CBD stones should undergo stone extraction. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether performing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for symptomatic CBD stones in a single session reduces complications related to postponing treatment due to separate EUS and ERCP sessions, and to assess the safety in both options. METHODS: A total of 151 patients with EUS-proven CBD stones, with subsequent ERCP, treated in our department between January 2005 and December 2011 were included. Complications related to the procedures or sedation and complications due to the CBD stones when EUS and ERCP were not performed in a single session were assessed and compared to complications when the two procedures were performed in one session. RESULTS: In total, 149 patients of the 151 (98.7 %) had a successful ERCP. Four (5 %) patients in the separate-session group (B) had a major complication compared to none in the single-session group (A) (p > 0.05). Group B received 14 % more midazolam during ERCP than group A (p < 0.05). No sedation-related complications were noted in either group. Eleven of the 80 patients in group B (13.8 %) experienced complications while waiting for ERCP compared to none in group A (p = 0.001, OR = 2.17, CI = 1.06–4. CONCLUSIONS: EUS and ERCP done in a single session proved to be safe, with no increase in sedation- or procedure-related complications. Postponing treatment for symptomatic CBD stones exposes the patient to biliary complications, especially cholangitis. Springer-Verlag 2013-02-07 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3661077/ /pubmed/23389062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2720-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Benjaminov, Fabiana
Stein, Assaf
Lichtman, George
Pomeranz, Itamar
Konikoff, Fred M.
Consecutive versus separate sessions of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for symptomatic choledocholithiasis
title Consecutive versus separate sessions of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for symptomatic choledocholithiasis
title_full Consecutive versus separate sessions of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for symptomatic choledocholithiasis
title_fullStr Consecutive versus separate sessions of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for symptomatic choledocholithiasis
title_full_unstemmed Consecutive versus separate sessions of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for symptomatic choledocholithiasis
title_short Consecutive versus separate sessions of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for symptomatic choledocholithiasis
title_sort consecutive versus separate sessions of endoscopic ultrasound (eus) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) for symptomatic choledocholithiasis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23389062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2720-7
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminovfabiana consecutiveversusseparatesessionsofendoscopicultrasoundeusandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpforsymptomaticcholedocholithiasis
AT steinassaf consecutiveversusseparatesessionsofendoscopicultrasoundeusandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpforsymptomaticcholedocholithiasis
AT lichtmangeorge consecutiveversusseparatesessionsofendoscopicultrasoundeusandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpforsymptomaticcholedocholithiasis
AT pomeranzitamar consecutiveversusseparatesessionsofendoscopicultrasoundeusandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpforsymptomaticcholedocholithiasis
AT konikofffredm consecutiveversusseparatesessionsofendoscopicultrasoundeusandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpforsymptomaticcholedocholithiasis