Cargando…

Validation study of a computer-based open surgical trainer: SimPraxis(®) simulation platform

BACKGROUND: Technological advances have dramatically changed medical education, particularly in the era of work-hour restrictions, which increasingly highlights a need for novel methods to teach surgical skills. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of a novel, computer-based, inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tran, Linh N, Gupta, Priyanka, Poniatowski, Lauren H, Alanee, Shaheen, Dall’Era, Marc A, Sweet, Robert M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23745097
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S38422
_version_ 1782270652398436352
author Tran, Linh N
Gupta, Priyanka
Poniatowski, Lauren H
Alanee, Shaheen
Dall’Era, Marc A
Sweet, Robert M
author_facet Tran, Linh N
Gupta, Priyanka
Poniatowski, Lauren H
Alanee, Shaheen
Dall’Era, Marc A
Sweet, Robert M
author_sort Tran, Linh N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Technological advances have dramatically changed medical education, particularly in the era of work-hour restrictions, which increasingly highlights a need for novel methods to teach surgical skills. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of a novel, computer-based, interactive, cognitive simulator for training surgeons to perform pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). METHODS: Eight prostate cancer experts evaluated the content of the simulator. Contextual aspects of the simulator were rated on a five-point Likert scale. The experts and nine first-year residents completed a simulated PLND. Time and deviations were logged, and the results were compared between experts and novices using the Mann–Whitney test. RESULTS: Before training, 88% of the experts felt that a validated simulator would be useful for PLND training. After testing, 100% of the experts felt that it would be more useful than standard video training. Eighty-eight percent stated that they would like to see the simulator in the curriculum of residency programs and 56% thought it would be useful for accreditation purposes. The experts felt that the simulator aided in overall understanding, training indications, concepts and steps of the procedure, training how to use an assistant, and enhanced the knowledge of anatomy. Median performance times taken by experts and interns to complete a PLND procedure on the simulator were 12.62 and 23.97 minutes, respectively. Median deviation from the incorporated procedure pathway for experts was 24.5 and was 89 for novices. CONCLUSION: We describe an interactive, computer-based simulator designed to assist in mastery of the cognitive steps of an open surgical procedure. This platform is intuitive and flexible, and could be applied to any stepwise medical procedure. Overall, experts outperformed novices in their performance on the trainer. Experts agreed that the content was acceptable, accurate, and representative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3661264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36612642013-06-06 Validation study of a computer-based open surgical trainer: SimPraxis(®) simulation platform Tran, Linh N Gupta, Priyanka Poniatowski, Lauren H Alanee, Shaheen Dall’Era, Marc A Sweet, Robert M Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: Technological advances have dramatically changed medical education, particularly in the era of work-hour restrictions, which increasingly highlights a need for novel methods to teach surgical skills. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of a novel, computer-based, interactive, cognitive simulator for training surgeons to perform pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). METHODS: Eight prostate cancer experts evaluated the content of the simulator. Contextual aspects of the simulator were rated on a five-point Likert scale. The experts and nine first-year residents completed a simulated PLND. Time and deviations were logged, and the results were compared between experts and novices using the Mann–Whitney test. RESULTS: Before training, 88% of the experts felt that a validated simulator would be useful for PLND training. After testing, 100% of the experts felt that it would be more useful than standard video training. Eighty-eight percent stated that they would like to see the simulator in the curriculum of residency programs and 56% thought it would be useful for accreditation purposes. The experts felt that the simulator aided in overall understanding, training indications, concepts and steps of the procedure, training how to use an assistant, and enhanced the knowledge of anatomy. Median performance times taken by experts and interns to complete a PLND procedure on the simulator were 12.62 and 23.97 minutes, respectively. Median deviation from the incorporated procedure pathway for experts was 24.5 and was 89 for novices. CONCLUSION: We describe an interactive, computer-based simulator designed to assist in mastery of the cognitive steps of an open surgical procedure. This platform is intuitive and flexible, and could be applied to any stepwise medical procedure. Overall, experts outperformed novices in their performance on the trainer. Experts agreed that the content was acceptable, accurate, and representative. Dove Medical Press 2013-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3661264/ /pubmed/23745097 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S38422 Text en © 2013 Tran et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tran, Linh N
Gupta, Priyanka
Poniatowski, Lauren H
Alanee, Shaheen
Dall’Era, Marc A
Sweet, Robert M
Validation study of a computer-based open surgical trainer: SimPraxis(®) simulation platform
title Validation study of a computer-based open surgical trainer: SimPraxis(®) simulation platform
title_full Validation study of a computer-based open surgical trainer: SimPraxis(®) simulation platform
title_fullStr Validation study of a computer-based open surgical trainer: SimPraxis(®) simulation platform
title_full_unstemmed Validation study of a computer-based open surgical trainer: SimPraxis(®) simulation platform
title_short Validation study of a computer-based open surgical trainer: SimPraxis(®) simulation platform
title_sort validation study of a computer-based open surgical trainer: simpraxis(®) simulation platform
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23745097
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S38422
work_keys_str_mv AT tranlinhn validationstudyofacomputerbasedopensurgicaltrainersimpraxissimulationplatform
AT guptapriyanka validationstudyofacomputerbasedopensurgicaltrainersimpraxissimulationplatform
AT poniatowskilaurenh validationstudyofacomputerbasedopensurgicaltrainersimpraxissimulationplatform
AT alaneeshaheen validationstudyofacomputerbasedopensurgicaltrainersimpraxissimulationplatform
AT dalleramarca validationstudyofacomputerbasedopensurgicaltrainersimpraxissimulationplatform
AT sweetrobertm validationstudyofacomputerbasedopensurgicaltrainersimpraxissimulationplatform