Cargando…

Randomized controlled trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND: After the failure of a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (nsAI) for postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC), it is unclear which of various kinds of endocrine therapy is the most appropriate. A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the efficacy and safe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamamoto, Yutaka, Ishikawa, Takashi, Hozumi, Yasuo, Ikeda, Masahiko, Iwata, Hiroji, Yamashita, Hiroko, Toyama, Tatsuya, Chishima, Takashi, Saji, Shigehira, Yamamoto-Ibusuki, Mutsuko, Iwase, Hirotaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23679192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-239
_version_ 1782270663942209536
author Yamamoto, Yutaka
Ishikawa, Takashi
Hozumi, Yasuo
Ikeda, Masahiko
Iwata, Hiroji
Yamashita, Hiroko
Toyama, Tatsuya
Chishima, Takashi
Saji, Shigehira
Yamamoto-Ibusuki, Mutsuko
Iwase, Hirotaka
author_facet Yamamoto, Yutaka
Ishikawa, Takashi
Hozumi, Yasuo
Ikeda, Masahiko
Iwata, Hiroji
Yamashita, Hiroko
Toyama, Tatsuya
Chishima, Takashi
Saji, Shigehira
Yamamoto-Ibusuki, Mutsuko
Iwase, Hirotaka
author_sort Yamamoto, Yutaka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After the failure of a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (nsAI) for postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC), it is unclear which of various kinds of endocrine therapy is the most appropriate. A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of daily toremifene 120 mg (TOR120), a selective estrogen receptor modulator, and exemestane 25 mg (EXE), a steroidal aromatase inhibitor. The primary end point was the clinical benefit rate (CBR). The secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. METHODS: Initially, a total of 91 women was registered in the study and randomly assigned to either TOR120 (n = 46) or EXE (n = 45) from October 2008 to November 2011. Three of the 46 patients in the TOR120 arm were not received treatment, 2 patients having withdrawn from the trial by their preference and one having been dropped due to administration of another SERM. RESULTS: When analyzed after a median observation period of 16.9 months, the intention-to-treat analysis showed that there were no statistical difference between TOR120 (N = 46) and EXE (n = 45) in terms of CBR (41.3% vs. 26.7%; P = 0.14), ORR (10.8% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.083), and OS (Hazard ratio, 0.60; P = 0.22). The PFS of TOR120 was longer than that of EXE, the difference being statistically significant (Hazard ratio, 0.61, P = 0.045). The results in treatment-received cohort (N = 88) were similar to those in ITT cohort. Both treatments were well-tolerated with no severe adverse events, although the treatment of 3 of 43 women administered TOR120 was stopped after a few days because of nausea, general fatigue, hot flush and night sweating. CONCLUSIONS: TOR120, as a subsequent endocrine therapy for mBC patients who failed non-steroidal AI treatment, could potentially be more beneficial than EXE. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000001841
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3661372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36613722013-05-23 Randomized controlled trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer Yamamoto, Yutaka Ishikawa, Takashi Hozumi, Yasuo Ikeda, Masahiko Iwata, Hiroji Yamashita, Hiroko Toyama, Tatsuya Chishima, Takashi Saji, Shigehira Yamamoto-Ibusuki, Mutsuko Iwase, Hirotaka BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: After the failure of a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (nsAI) for postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC), it is unclear which of various kinds of endocrine therapy is the most appropriate. A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of daily toremifene 120 mg (TOR120), a selective estrogen receptor modulator, and exemestane 25 mg (EXE), a steroidal aromatase inhibitor. The primary end point was the clinical benefit rate (CBR). The secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. METHODS: Initially, a total of 91 women was registered in the study and randomly assigned to either TOR120 (n = 46) or EXE (n = 45) from October 2008 to November 2011. Three of the 46 patients in the TOR120 arm were not received treatment, 2 patients having withdrawn from the trial by their preference and one having been dropped due to administration of another SERM. RESULTS: When analyzed after a median observation period of 16.9 months, the intention-to-treat analysis showed that there were no statistical difference between TOR120 (N = 46) and EXE (n = 45) in terms of CBR (41.3% vs. 26.7%; P = 0.14), ORR (10.8% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.083), and OS (Hazard ratio, 0.60; P = 0.22). The PFS of TOR120 was longer than that of EXE, the difference being statistically significant (Hazard ratio, 0.61, P = 0.045). The results in treatment-received cohort (N = 88) were similar to those in ITT cohort. Both treatments were well-tolerated with no severe adverse events, although the treatment of 3 of 43 women administered TOR120 was stopped after a few days because of nausea, general fatigue, hot flush and night sweating. CONCLUSIONS: TOR120, as a subsequent endocrine therapy for mBC patients who failed non-steroidal AI treatment, could potentially be more beneficial than EXE. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000001841 BioMed Central 2013-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3661372/ /pubmed/23679192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-239 Text en Copyright © 2013 Yamamoto et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yamamoto, Yutaka
Ishikawa, Takashi
Hozumi, Yasuo
Ikeda, Masahiko
Iwata, Hiroji
Yamashita, Hiroko
Toyama, Tatsuya
Chishima, Takashi
Saji, Shigehira
Yamamoto-Ibusuki, Mutsuko
Iwase, Hirotaka
Randomized controlled trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
title Randomized controlled trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
title_full Randomized controlled trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
title_fullStr Randomized controlled trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
title_short Randomized controlled trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
title_sort randomized controlled trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23679192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-239
work_keys_str_mv AT yamamotoyutaka randomizedcontrolledtrialoftoremifene120mgcomparedwithexemestane25mgafterpriortreatmentwithanonsteroidalaromataseinhibitorinpostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcancer
AT ishikawatakashi randomizedcontrolledtrialoftoremifene120mgcomparedwithexemestane25mgafterpriortreatmentwithanonsteroidalaromataseinhibitorinpostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcancer
AT hozumiyasuo randomizedcontrolledtrialoftoremifene120mgcomparedwithexemestane25mgafterpriortreatmentwithanonsteroidalaromataseinhibitorinpostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcancer
AT ikedamasahiko randomizedcontrolledtrialoftoremifene120mgcomparedwithexemestane25mgafterpriortreatmentwithanonsteroidalaromataseinhibitorinpostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcancer
AT iwatahiroji randomizedcontrolledtrialoftoremifene120mgcomparedwithexemestane25mgafterpriortreatmentwithanonsteroidalaromataseinhibitorinpostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcancer
AT yamashitahiroko randomizedcontrolledtrialoftoremifene120mgcomparedwithexemestane25mgafterpriortreatmentwithanonsteroidalaromataseinhibitorinpostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcancer
AT toyamatatsuya randomizedcontrolledtrialoftoremifene120mgcomparedwithexemestane25mgafterpriortreatmentwithanonsteroidalaromataseinhibitorinpostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcancer
AT chishimatakashi randomizedcontrolledtrialoftoremifene120mgcomparedwithexemestane25mgafterpriortreatmentwithanonsteroidalaromataseinhibitorinpostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcancer
AT sajishigehira randomizedcontrolledtrialoftoremifene120mgcomparedwithexemestane25mgafterpriortreatmentwithanonsteroidalaromataseinhibitorinpostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcancer
AT yamamotoibusukimutsuko randomizedcontrolledtrialoftoremifene120mgcomparedwithexemestane25mgafterpriortreatmentwithanonsteroidalaromataseinhibitorinpostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcancer
AT iwasehirotaka randomizedcontrolledtrialoftoremifene120mgcomparedwithexemestane25mgafterpriortreatmentwithanonsteroidalaromataseinhibitorinpostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcancer