Cargando…

Multivariate methods and software for association mapping in dose‐response genome‐wide association studies

BACKGROUND: The large sample sizes, freedom of ethical restrictions and ease of repeated measurements make cytotoxicity assays of immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines a powerful new in vitro method in pharmacogenomics research. However, previous studies may have over‐simplified the complex differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Chad C, Havener, Tammy M, Medina, Marisa Wong, Krauss, Ronald M, McLeod, Howard L, Motsinger‐Reif, Alison A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23234571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-5-21
_version_ 1782270666711498752
author Brown, Chad C
Havener, Tammy M
Medina, Marisa Wong
Krauss, Ronald M
McLeod, Howard L
Motsinger‐Reif, Alison A
author_facet Brown, Chad C
Havener, Tammy M
Medina, Marisa Wong
Krauss, Ronald M
McLeod, Howard L
Motsinger‐Reif, Alison A
author_sort Brown, Chad C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The large sample sizes, freedom of ethical restrictions and ease of repeated measurements make cytotoxicity assays of immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines a powerful new in vitro method in pharmacogenomics research. However, previous studies may have over‐simplified the complex differences in dose‐response profiles between genotypes, resulting in a loss of power. METHODS: The current study investigates four previously studied methods, plus one new method based on a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) design. A simulation study was performed using differences in cancer drug response between genotypes for biologically meaningful loci. These loci also showed significance in separate genome‐wide association studies. This manuscript builds upon a previous study, where differences in dose‐response curves between genotypes were constructed using the hill slope equation. CONCLUSION: Overall, MANOVA was found to be the most powerful method for detecting real signals, and was also the most robust method for detection using alternatives generated with the previous simulation study. This method is also attractive because test statistics follow their expected distributions under the null hypothesis for both simulated and real data. The success of this method inspired the creation of the software program MAGWAS. MAGWAS is a computationally efficient, user‐friendly, open source software tool that works on most platforms and performs GWASs for individuals having multivariate responses using standard file formats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3661384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36613842013-05-23 Multivariate methods and software for association mapping in dose‐response genome‐wide association studies Brown, Chad C Havener, Tammy M Medina, Marisa Wong Krauss, Ronald M McLeod, Howard L Motsinger‐Reif, Alison A BioData Min Short Report BACKGROUND: The large sample sizes, freedom of ethical restrictions and ease of repeated measurements make cytotoxicity assays of immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines a powerful new in vitro method in pharmacogenomics research. However, previous studies may have over‐simplified the complex differences in dose‐response profiles between genotypes, resulting in a loss of power. METHODS: The current study investigates four previously studied methods, plus one new method based on a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) design. A simulation study was performed using differences in cancer drug response between genotypes for biologically meaningful loci. These loci also showed significance in separate genome‐wide association studies. This manuscript builds upon a previous study, where differences in dose‐response curves between genotypes were constructed using the hill slope equation. CONCLUSION: Overall, MANOVA was found to be the most powerful method for detecting real signals, and was also the most robust method for detection using alternatives generated with the previous simulation study. This method is also attractive because test statistics follow their expected distributions under the null hypothesis for both simulated and real data. The success of this method inspired the creation of the software program MAGWAS. MAGWAS is a computationally efficient, user‐friendly, open source software tool that works on most platforms and performs GWASs for individuals having multivariate responses using standard file formats. BioMed Central 2012-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3661384/ /pubmed/23234571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-5-21 Text en Copyright © 2012 Brown et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Brown, Chad C
Havener, Tammy M
Medina, Marisa Wong
Krauss, Ronald M
McLeod, Howard L
Motsinger‐Reif, Alison A
Multivariate methods and software for association mapping in dose‐response genome‐wide association studies
title Multivariate methods and software for association mapping in dose‐response genome‐wide association studies
title_full Multivariate methods and software for association mapping in dose‐response genome‐wide association studies
title_fullStr Multivariate methods and software for association mapping in dose‐response genome‐wide association studies
title_full_unstemmed Multivariate methods and software for association mapping in dose‐response genome‐wide association studies
title_short Multivariate methods and software for association mapping in dose‐response genome‐wide association studies
title_sort multivariate methods and software for association mapping in dose‐response genome‐wide association studies
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23234571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-5-21
work_keys_str_mv AT brownchadc multivariatemethodsandsoftwareforassociationmappingindoseresponsegenomewideassociationstudies
AT havenertammym multivariatemethodsandsoftwareforassociationmappingindoseresponsegenomewideassociationstudies
AT medinamarisawong multivariatemethodsandsoftwareforassociationmappingindoseresponsegenomewideassociationstudies
AT kraussronaldm multivariatemethodsandsoftwareforassociationmappingindoseresponsegenomewideassociationstudies
AT mcleodhowardl multivariatemethodsandsoftwareforassociationmappingindoseresponsegenomewideassociationstudies
AT motsingerreifalisona multivariatemethodsandsoftwareforassociationmappingindoseresponsegenomewideassociationstudies