Cargando…

Therapeutic Options in Docetaxel-Refractory Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is an established first-line therapy to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Recently, abiraterone and cabazitaxel were approved for use after docetaxel failure, with improved survival. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) preli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Lixian, Pon, Vickie, Srinivas, Sandy, Nguyen, Nicole, Frear, Meghan, Kwon, Sherry, Gong, Cynthia, Malmstrom, Robert, Wilson, Leslie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23717582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064275
_version_ 1782270682617348096
author Zhong, Lixian
Pon, Vickie
Srinivas, Sandy
Nguyen, Nicole
Frear, Meghan
Kwon, Sherry
Gong, Cynthia
Malmstrom, Robert
Wilson, Leslie
author_facet Zhong, Lixian
Pon, Vickie
Srinivas, Sandy
Nguyen, Nicole
Frear, Meghan
Kwon, Sherry
Gong, Cynthia
Malmstrom, Robert
Wilson, Leslie
author_sort Zhong, Lixian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is an established first-line therapy to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Recently, abiraterone and cabazitaxel were approved for use after docetaxel failure, with improved survival. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) preliminary recommendations were negative for both abiraterone (now positive in final recommendation) and cabazitaxel (negative in final recommendation). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of abiraterone, cabazitaxel, mitoxantrone and prednisone for mCRPC treatment in US. METHODS: A decision-tree model was constructed to compare the two mCRPC treatments versus two placebos over 18 months from a societal perspective. Chance nodes include baseline pain as a severity indicator, grade III/IV side-effects, and survival at 18 months. Probabilities, survival and health utilities were from published studies. Model cost inputs included drug treatment, side-effect management and prevention, radiation for pain, and death associated costs in 2010 US dollars. RESULTS: Abiraterone is a cost-effective choice at $94K/QALY (quality adjusted life years) compared to placebo in our base-case analysis. Cabazitaxel and abiraterone are the most effective, yet also most expensive agents. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) at base-case are $101K/QALY (extended dominated) for mitoxantrone vs. placebo, $91K/QALY for abiraterone vs. mitoxantrone, $956K/QALY for cabazitaxel vs. abiraterone. Abiraterone becomes less cost-effective as its AWP increases, or if the cost of mitoxantrone side-effect management decreases. Increases in the percentage of patients with baseline pain leads to an increased ICER for both mitoxantrone and abiraterone, but mitoxantrone does relatively better. Cabazitaxel remains not cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Our base case model suggests that abiraterone is a cost-effective option in docetaxel-refractory mCRPC patients. Newer treatments will also need a CEA assessment compared to abiraterone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3661482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36614822013-05-28 Therapeutic Options in Docetaxel-Refractory Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Zhong, Lixian Pon, Vickie Srinivas, Sandy Nguyen, Nicole Frear, Meghan Kwon, Sherry Gong, Cynthia Malmstrom, Robert Wilson, Leslie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is an established first-line therapy to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Recently, abiraterone and cabazitaxel were approved for use after docetaxel failure, with improved survival. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) preliminary recommendations were negative for both abiraterone (now positive in final recommendation) and cabazitaxel (negative in final recommendation). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of abiraterone, cabazitaxel, mitoxantrone and prednisone for mCRPC treatment in US. METHODS: A decision-tree model was constructed to compare the two mCRPC treatments versus two placebos over 18 months from a societal perspective. Chance nodes include baseline pain as a severity indicator, grade III/IV side-effects, and survival at 18 months. Probabilities, survival and health utilities were from published studies. Model cost inputs included drug treatment, side-effect management and prevention, radiation for pain, and death associated costs in 2010 US dollars. RESULTS: Abiraterone is a cost-effective choice at $94K/QALY (quality adjusted life years) compared to placebo in our base-case analysis. Cabazitaxel and abiraterone are the most effective, yet also most expensive agents. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) at base-case are $101K/QALY (extended dominated) for mitoxantrone vs. placebo, $91K/QALY for abiraterone vs. mitoxantrone, $956K/QALY for cabazitaxel vs. abiraterone. Abiraterone becomes less cost-effective as its AWP increases, or if the cost of mitoxantrone side-effect management decreases. Increases in the percentage of patients with baseline pain leads to an increased ICER for both mitoxantrone and abiraterone, but mitoxantrone does relatively better. Cabazitaxel remains not cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Our base case model suggests that abiraterone is a cost-effective option in docetaxel-refractory mCRPC patients. Newer treatments will also need a CEA assessment compared to abiraterone. Public Library of Science 2013-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3661482/ /pubmed/23717582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064275 Text en © 2013 Zhong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhong, Lixian
Pon, Vickie
Srinivas, Sandy
Nguyen, Nicole
Frear, Meghan
Kwon, Sherry
Gong, Cynthia
Malmstrom, Robert
Wilson, Leslie
Therapeutic Options in Docetaxel-Refractory Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title Therapeutic Options in Docetaxel-Refractory Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full Therapeutic Options in Docetaxel-Refractory Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr Therapeutic Options in Docetaxel-Refractory Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic Options in Docetaxel-Refractory Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_short Therapeutic Options in Docetaxel-Refractory Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_sort therapeutic options in docetaxel-refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23717582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064275
work_keys_str_mv AT zhonglixian therapeuticoptionsindocetaxelrefractorymetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT ponvickie therapeuticoptionsindocetaxelrefractorymetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT srinivassandy therapeuticoptionsindocetaxelrefractorymetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT nguyennicole therapeuticoptionsindocetaxelrefractorymetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT frearmeghan therapeuticoptionsindocetaxelrefractorymetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT kwonsherry therapeuticoptionsindocetaxelrefractorymetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT gongcynthia therapeuticoptionsindocetaxelrefractorymetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT malmstromrobert therapeuticoptionsindocetaxelrefractorymetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT wilsonleslie therapeuticoptionsindocetaxelrefractorymetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysis