Cargando…

Effectiveness of a Hospital-Based Work Support Intervention for Female Cancer Patients – A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: One key aspect of cancer survivorship is return-to-work. Unfortunately, many cancer survivors face problems upon their return-to-work. For that reason, we developed a hospital-based work support intervention aimed at enhancing return-to-work. We studied effectiveness of the intervention c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tamminga, Sietske J., Verbeek, Jos H. A. M., Bos, Monique M. E. M., Fons, Guus, Kitzen, Jos J. E. M., Plaisier, Peter W., Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W., de Boer, Angela G. E. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23717406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063271
_version_ 1782270699548704768
author Tamminga, Sietske J.
Verbeek, Jos H. A. M.
Bos, Monique M. E. M.
Fons, Guus
Kitzen, Jos J. E. M.
Plaisier, Peter W.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
de Boer, Angela G. E. M.
author_facet Tamminga, Sietske J.
Verbeek, Jos H. A. M.
Bos, Monique M. E. M.
Fons, Guus
Kitzen, Jos J. E. M.
Plaisier, Peter W.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
de Boer, Angela G. E. M.
author_sort Tamminga, Sietske J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: One key aspect of cancer survivorship is return-to-work. Unfortunately, many cancer survivors face problems upon their return-to-work. For that reason, we developed a hospital-based work support intervention aimed at enhancing return-to-work. We studied effectiveness of the intervention compared to usual care for female cancer patients in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Breast and gynaecological cancer patients who were treated with curative intent and had paid work were randomised to the intervention group (n = 65) or control group (n = 68). The intervention involved patient education and support at the hospital and improvement of communication between treating and occupational physicians. In addition, we asked patient's occupational physician to organise a meeting with the patient and the supervisor to make a concrete gradual return-to-work plan. Outcomes at 12 months of follow-up included rate and time until return-to-work (full or partial), quality of life, work ability, work functioning, and lost productivity costs. Time until return-to-work was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: Return-to-work rates were 86% and 83% (p = 0.6) for the intervention group and control group when excluding 8 patients who died or with a life expectancy of months at follow-up. Median time from initial sick leave to partial return-to-work was 194 days (range 14–435) versus 192 days (range 82–465) (p = 0.90) with a hazard ratio of 1.03 (95% CI 0.64–1.6). Quality of life and work ability improved statistically over time but did not differ statistically between groups. Work functioning and costs did not differ statistically between groups. CONCLUSION: The intervention was easily implemented into usual psycho-oncological care and showed high return-to-work rates. We failed to show any differences between groups on return-to-work outcomes and quality of life scores. Further research is needed to study which aspects of the intervention are useful and which elements need improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register (NTR) 1658
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3661555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36615552013-05-28 Effectiveness of a Hospital-Based Work Support Intervention for Female Cancer Patients – A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial Tamminga, Sietske J. Verbeek, Jos H. A. M. Bos, Monique M. E. M. Fons, Guus Kitzen, Jos J. E. M. Plaisier, Peter W. Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W. de Boer, Angela G. E. M. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: One key aspect of cancer survivorship is return-to-work. Unfortunately, many cancer survivors face problems upon their return-to-work. For that reason, we developed a hospital-based work support intervention aimed at enhancing return-to-work. We studied effectiveness of the intervention compared to usual care for female cancer patients in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Breast and gynaecological cancer patients who were treated with curative intent and had paid work were randomised to the intervention group (n = 65) or control group (n = 68). The intervention involved patient education and support at the hospital and improvement of communication between treating and occupational physicians. In addition, we asked patient's occupational physician to organise a meeting with the patient and the supervisor to make a concrete gradual return-to-work plan. Outcomes at 12 months of follow-up included rate and time until return-to-work (full or partial), quality of life, work ability, work functioning, and lost productivity costs. Time until return-to-work was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: Return-to-work rates were 86% and 83% (p = 0.6) for the intervention group and control group when excluding 8 patients who died or with a life expectancy of months at follow-up. Median time from initial sick leave to partial return-to-work was 194 days (range 14–435) versus 192 days (range 82–465) (p = 0.90) with a hazard ratio of 1.03 (95% CI 0.64–1.6). Quality of life and work ability improved statistically over time but did not differ statistically between groups. Work functioning and costs did not differ statistically between groups. CONCLUSION: The intervention was easily implemented into usual psycho-oncological care and showed high return-to-work rates. We failed to show any differences between groups on return-to-work outcomes and quality of life scores. Further research is needed to study which aspects of the intervention are useful and which elements need improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register (NTR) 1658 Public Library of Science 2013-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3661555/ /pubmed/23717406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063271 Text en © 2013 Tamminga et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tamminga, Sietske J.
Verbeek, Jos H. A. M.
Bos, Monique M. E. M.
Fons, Guus
Kitzen, Jos J. E. M.
Plaisier, Peter W.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
de Boer, Angela G. E. M.
Effectiveness of a Hospital-Based Work Support Intervention for Female Cancer Patients – A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial
title Effectiveness of a Hospital-Based Work Support Intervention for Female Cancer Patients – A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full Effectiveness of a Hospital-Based Work Support Intervention for Female Cancer Patients – A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a Hospital-Based Work Support Intervention for Female Cancer Patients – A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a Hospital-Based Work Support Intervention for Female Cancer Patients – A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial
title_short Effectiveness of a Hospital-Based Work Support Intervention for Female Cancer Patients – A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial
title_sort effectiveness of a hospital-based work support intervention for female cancer patients – a multi-centre randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23717406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063271
work_keys_str_mv AT tammingasietskej effectivenessofahospitalbasedworksupportinterventionforfemalecancerpatientsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT verbeekjosham effectivenessofahospitalbasedworksupportinterventionforfemalecancerpatientsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bosmoniquemem effectivenessofahospitalbasedworksupportinterventionforfemalecancerpatientsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fonsguus effectivenessofahospitalbasedworksupportinterventionforfemalecancerpatientsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kitzenjosjem effectivenessofahospitalbasedworksupportinterventionforfemalecancerpatientsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT plaisierpeterw effectivenessofahospitalbasedworksupportinterventionforfemalecancerpatientsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fringsdresenmoniquehw effectivenessofahospitalbasedworksupportinterventionforfemalecancerpatientsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT deboerangelagem effectivenessofahospitalbasedworksupportinterventionforfemalecancerpatientsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial