Cargando…

Temporal Validation of the UKPDS Outcomes Model Using 10-Year Posttrial Monitoring Data

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model (UKPDS-OM) in predicting clinical outcomes during the UKPDS posttrial monitoring (PTM) period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: At trial end in 1997, the 4,031 surviving UKPDS patients, of the 5,102 originally enroll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leal, Jose, Hayes, Alison J., Gray, Alastair M., Holman, Rury R., Clarke, Philip M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23275370
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1120
_version_ 1782270750029250560
author Leal, Jose
Hayes, Alison J.
Gray, Alastair M.
Holman, Rury R.
Clarke, Philip M.
author_facet Leal, Jose
Hayes, Alison J.
Gray, Alastair M.
Holman, Rury R.
Clarke, Philip M.
author_sort Leal, Jose
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model (UKPDS-OM) in predicting clinical outcomes during the UKPDS posttrial monitoring (PTM) period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: At trial end in 1997, the 4,031 surviving UKPDS patients, of the 5,102 originally enrolled in the study, returned to their usual care providers, with no attempts made to maintain them in their randomized therapy groups. PTM risk factor data were collected for 5 years and clinical outcome data for 10 years. The UKPDS-OM was used firstly to forecast likely progression of HbA(1c), systolic blood pressure, total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio, and smoking status and secondly to estimate the likely first occurrence of seven major diabetes-related complications or death from any cause. Model predictions were compared against observed PTM data for risk factor time paths and survival probabilities for major diabetes complications. RESULTS: UKPDS-OM–forecasted risk factor time paths were similar to those observed for HbA(1c) (up to 3 years) and total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio but underestimated for systolic blood pressure and smoking status. Predicted 10-year event probabilities were similar to those observed for blindness, ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, and renal failure but were higher for heart failure and death from any cause and lower for stroke and amputation. CONCLUSIONS: The UKPDS-OM has good predictive accuracy for two of four risk factor time paths and for 10-year clinical outcome probabilities with the exception of stroke, amputation, heart failure, and death from any cause. An updated version of the model incorporating PTM data is being developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3661828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36618282014-06-01 Temporal Validation of the UKPDS Outcomes Model Using 10-Year Posttrial Monitoring Data Leal, Jose Hayes, Alison J. Gray, Alastair M. Holman, Rury R. Clarke, Philip M. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model (UKPDS-OM) in predicting clinical outcomes during the UKPDS posttrial monitoring (PTM) period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: At trial end in 1997, the 4,031 surviving UKPDS patients, of the 5,102 originally enrolled in the study, returned to their usual care providers, with no attempts made to maintain them in their randomized therapy groups. PTM risk factor data were collected for 5 years and clinical outcome data for 10 years. The UKPDS-OM was used firstly to forecast likely progression of HbA(1c), systolic blood pressure, total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio, and smoking status and secondly to estimate the likely first occurrence of seven major diabetes-related complications or death from any cause. Model predictions were compared against observed PTM data for risk factor time paths and survival probabilities for major diabetes complications. RESULTS: UKPDS-OM–forecasted risk factor time paths were similar to those observed for HbA(1c) (up to 3 years) and total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio but underestimated for systolic blood pressure and smoking status. Predicted 10-year event probabilities were similar to those observed for blindness, ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, and renal failure but were higher for heart failure and death from any cause and lower for stroke and amputation. CONCLUSIONS: The UKPDS-OM has good predictive accuracy for two of four risk factor time paths and for 10-year clinical outcome probabilities with the exception of stroke, amputation, heart failure, and death from any cause. An updated version of the model incorporating PTM data is being developed. American Diabetes Association 2013-06 2013-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3661828/ /pubmed/23275370 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1120 Text en © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Leal, Jose
Hayes, Alison J.
Gray, Alastair M.
Holman, Rury R.
Clarke, Philip M.
Temporal Validation of the UKPDS Outcomes Model Using 10-Year Posttrial Monitoring Data
title Temporal Validation of the UKPDS Outcomes Model Using 10-Year Posttrial Monitoring Data
title_full Temporal Validation of the UKPDS Outcomes Model Using 10-Year Posttrial Monitoring Data
title_fullStr Temporal Validation of the UKPDS Outcomes Model Using 10-Year Posttrial Monitoring Data
title_full_unstemmed Temporal Validation of the UKPDS Outcomes Model Using 10-Year Posttrial Monitoring Data
title_short Temporal Validation of the UKPDS Outcomes Model Using 10-Year Posttrial Monitoring Data
title_sort temporal validation of the ukpds outcomes model using 10-year posttrial monitoring data
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23275370
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1120
work_keys_str_mv AT lealjose temporalvalidationoftheukpdsoutcomesmodelusing10yearposttrialmonitoringdata
AT hayesalisonj temporalvalidationoftheukpdsoutcomesmodelusing10yearposttrialmonitoringdata
AT grayalastairm temporalvalidationoftheukpdsoutcomesmodelusing10yearposttrialmonitoringdata
AT holmanruryr temporalvalidationoftheukpdsoutcomesmodelusing10yearposttrialmonitoringdata
AT clarkephilipm temporalvalidationoftheukpdsoutcomesmodelusing10yearposttrialmonitoringdata