Cargando…

Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for surgically managed fresh diaphyseal fractures of the lower extremity: multi-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: There are no evidence on the effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) on surgically managed fresh fractures. We therefore performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study to investigate the effects of LIPUS on surgically managed fresh fractures. METHODS: This study included p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinami, Yo, Noda, Tomoyuki, Ozaki, Toshifumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23463120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0358-5
_version_ 1782270770054955008
author Kinami, Yo
Noda, Tomoyuki
Ozaki, Toshifumi
author_facet Kinami, Yo
Noda, Tomoyuki
Ozaki, Toshifumi
author_sort Kinami, Yo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are no evidence on the effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) on surgically managed fresh fractures. We therefore performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study to investigate the effects of LIPUS on surgically managed fresh fractures. METHODS: This study included patients surgically treated for diaphyseal fractures of the femur or tibia between August 2009 and July 2010 at 14 institutions. Outcome was the union period. We performed an overall comparison of the LIPUS group (78 cases) with the control group (63 cases), as well as subgroup analyses comparing outcomes for fracture sites, fracture types, soft tissue conditions, and fixation methods between the groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of distribution of cases by fracture site, fracture type, soft tissue condition, fixation method. Analyses comparing subgroups, however, showed significant differences between the two groups, particularly in relation to type C fractures, regardless of whether all cases or only closed-fracture cases were analyzed: there was an approximately 30 % reduction in the union period for type C fractures in the LIPUS group. There were also cases requiring reoperation due to lack of stability, even among the type C fractures. CONCLUSIONS: LIPUS is effective for surgically managed, fresh, type C comminuted diaphyseal fractures of the lower limbs when there is appropriate stability at the fracture site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3661929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36619292013-05-23 Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for surgically managed fresh diaphyseal fractures of the lower extremity: multi-center retrospective cohort study Kinami, Yo Noda, Tomoyuki Ozaki, Toshifumi J Orthop Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: There are no evidence on the effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) on surgically managed fresh fractures. We therefore performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study to investigate the effects of LIPUS on surgically managed fresh fractures. METHODS: This study included patients surgically treated for diaphyseal fractures of the femur or tibia between August 2009 and July 2010 at 14 institutions. Outcome was the union period. We performed an overall comparison of the LIPUS group (78 cases) with the control group (63 cases), as well as subgroup analyses comparing outcomes for fracture sites, fracture types, soft tissue conditions, and fixation methods between the groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of distribution of cases by fracture site, fracture type, soft tissue condition, fixation method. Analyses comparing subgroups, however, showed significant differences between the two groups, particularly in relation to type C fractures, regardless of whether all cases or only closed-fracture cases were analyzed: there was an approximately 30 % reduction in the union period for type C fractures in the LIPUS group. There were also cases requiring reoperation due to lack of stability, even among the type C fractures. CONCLUSIONS: LIPUS is effective for surgically managed, fresh, type C comminuted diaphyseal fractures of the lower limbs when there is appropriate stability at the fracture site. Springer Japan 2013-03-06 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3661929/ /pubmed/23463120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0358-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kinami, Yo
Noda, Tomoyuki
Ozaki, Toshifumi
Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for surgically managed fresh diaphyseal fractures of the lower extremity: multi-center retrospective cohort study
title Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for surgically managed fresh diaphyseal fractures of the lower extremity: multi-center retrospective cohort study
title_full Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for surgically managed fresh diaphyseal fractures of the lower extremity: multi-center retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for surgically managed fresh diaphyseal fractures of the lower extremity: multi-center retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for surgically managed fresh diaphyseal fractures of the lower extremity: multi-center retrospective cohort study
title_short Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for surgically managed fresh diaphyseal fractures of the lower extremity: multi-center retrospective cohort study
title_sort efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for surgically managed fresh diaphyseal fractures of the lower extremity: multi-center retrospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3661929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23463120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0358-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kinamiyo efficacyoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundtreatmentforsurgicallymanagedfreshdiaphysealfracturesofthelowerextremitymulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT nodatomoyuki efficacyoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundtreatmentforsurgicallymanagedfreshdiaphysealfracturesofthelowerextremitymulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ozakitoshifumi efficacyoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundtreatmentforsurgicallymanagedfreshdiaphysealfracturesofthelowerextremitymulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy