Cargando…

Mapping the EQ-5D index by UPDRS and PDQ-8 in patients with Parkinson’s disease

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies employ the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) to measure the severity of Parkinson’s disease. Evaluations often fail to consider the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) or apply disease-specific instruments. Health-economic studies normally use estimates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dams, Judith, Klotsche, Jens, Bornschein, Bernhard, Reese, Jens P, Balzer-Geldsetzer, Monika, Winter, Yaroslav, Schrag, Anette, Siderowf, Andrew, Oertel, Wolfgang H, Deuschl, Günther, Siebert, Uwe, Dodel, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23497005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-35
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Clinical studies employ the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) to measure the severity of Parkinson’s disease. Evaluations often fail to consider the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) or apply disease-specific instruments. Health-economic studies normally use estimates of utilities to calculate quality-adjusted life years. We aimed to develop an estimation algorithm for EuroQol- 5 dimensions (EQ-5D)-based utilities from the clinical UPDRS or disease-specific HrQoL data in the absence of original utilities estimates. METHODS: Linear and fractional polynomial regression analyses were performed with data from a study of Parkinson’s disease patients (n=138) to predict the EQ-5D index values from UPDRS and Parkinson’s disease questionnaire eight dimensions (PDQ-8) data. German and European weights were used to calculate the EQ-5D index. The models were compared by R(2), the root mean square error (RMS), the Bayesian information criterion, and Pregibon’s link test. Three independent data sets validated the models. RESULTS: The regression analyses resulted in a single best prediction model (R(2): 0.713 and 0.684, RMS: 0.139 and 13.78 for indices with German and European weights, respectively) consisting of UPDRS subscores II, III, IVa-c as predictors. When the PDQ-8 items were utilised as independent variables, the model resulted in an R(2) of 0.60 and 0.67. The independent data confirmed the prediction models. CONCLUSION: The best results were obtained from a model consisting of UPDRS subscores II, III, IVa-c. Although a good model fit was observed, primary EQ-5D data are always preferable. Further validation of the prediction algorithm within large, independent studies is necessary prior to its generalised use.