Cargando…

Midterm Outcomes and Predictors of Clinical Success With the KineSpring Knee Implant System

The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate joint pain and function in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients treated with a joint-sparing, extracapsular implant and (2) identify patient characteristics that influenced clinical outcomes. This study included 99 patients with symptomatic medial knee OA r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: London, Nicholas J., Smith, Jon, Miller, Larry E., Block, Jon E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761985
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMAMD.S11768
_version_ 1782270832107585536
author London, Nicholas J.
Smith, Jon
Miller, Larry E.
Block, Jon E.
author_facet London, Nicholas J.
Smith, Jon
Miller, Larry E.
Block, Jon E.
author_sort London, Nicholas J.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate joint pain and function in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients treated with a joint-sparing, extracapsular implant and (2) identify patient characteristics that influenced clinical outcomes. This study included 99 patients with symptomatic medial knee OA refractory to conservative care who were treated with the KineSpring Knee Implant System and followed for a mean of 17 months (range, 1.5 to 48 months). All devices were successfully implanted and activated with no intraoperative complications. Statistically significant mean improvements of 56%, 50%, and 38% were observed for Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain, Function, and Stiffness scales, respectively (all P < 0.001). Regardless of gender, age group, body mass index classification, or disease severity, all WOMAC domain scores significantly improved during the postoperative follow-up period. WOMAC clinical success rates were 77.8% for Pain, 77.8% for Function, and 68.7% for Stiffness. Neither gender, age group, body mass index classification, nor disease severity predicted clinical success in any WOMAC domain. In conclusion, the KineSpring System yields clinically meaningful improvements in joint pain and function in patients with medial knee OA. Additionally, unlike joint-altering procedures such as knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy, patient characteristics had little association with postoperative clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3662395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36623952013-06-12 Midterm Outcomes and Predictors of Clinical Success With the KineSpring Knee Implant System London, Nicholas J. Smith, Jon Miller, Larry E. Block, Jon E. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord Original Research The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate joint pain and function in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients treated with a joint-sparing, extracapsular implant and (2) identify patient characteristics that influenced clinical outcomes. This study included 99 patients with symptomatic medial knee OA refractory to conservative care who were treated with the KineSpring Knee Implant System and followed for a mean of 17 months (range, 1.5 to 48 months). All devices were successfully implanted and activated with no intraoperative complications. Statistically significant mean improvements of 56%, 50%, and 38% were observed for Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain, Function, and Stiffness scales, respectively (all P < 0.001). Regardless of gender, age group, body mass index classification, or disease severity, all WOMAC domain scores significantly improved during the postoperative follow-up period. WOMAC clinical success rates were 77.8% for Pain, 77.8% for Function, and 68.7% for Stiffness. Neither gender, age group, body mass index classification, nor disease severity predicted clinical success in any WOMAC domain. In conclusion, the KineSpring System yields clinically meaningful improvements in joint pain and function in patients with medial knee OA. Additionally, unlike joint-altering procedures such as knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy, patient characteristics had little association with postoperative clinical outcomes. Libertas Academica 2013-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3662395/ /pubmed/23761985 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMAMD.S11768 Text en © 2013 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article published under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 3.0 license.
spellingShingle Original Research
London, Nicholas J.
Smith, Jon
Miller, Larry E.
Block, Jon E.
Midterm Outcomes and Predictors of Clinical Success With the KineSpring Knee Implant System
title Midterm Outcomes and Predictors of Clinical Success With the KineSpring Knee Implant System
title_full Midterm Outcomes and Predictors of Clinical Success With the KineSpring Knee Implant System
title_fullStr Midterm Outcomes and Predictors of Clinical Success With the KineSpring Knee Implant System
title_full_unstemmed Midterm Outcomes and Predictors of Clinical Success With the KineSpring Knee Implant System
title_short Midterm Outcomes and Predictors of Clinical Success With the KineSpring Knee Implant System
title_sort midterm outcomes and predictors of clinical success with the kinespring knee implant system
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761985
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMAMD.S11768
work_keys_str_mv AT londonnicholasj midtermoutcomesandpredictorsofclinicalsuccesswiththekinespringkneeimplantsystem
AT smithjon midtermoutcomesandpredictorsofclinicalsuccesswiththekinespringkneeimplantsystem
AT millerlarrye midtermoutcomesandpredictorsofclinicalsuccesswiththekinespringkneeimplantsystem
AT blockjone midtermoutcomesandpredictorsofclinicalsuccesswiththekinespringkneeimplantsystem