Cargando…

Costs and Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Single Port and Micro-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compares hospital costs and clinical outcomes for conventional laparoscopic, single-port, and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy from US hospitals. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years and undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with records in the Premi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chekan, Edward, Moore, Matthew, Hunter, Tina D., Gunnarsson, Candace
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23743370
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13517013317635
_version_ 1782270879694061568
author Chekan, Edward
Moore, Matthew
Hunter, Tina D.
Gunnarsson, Candace
author_facet Chekan, Edward
Moore, Matthew
Hunter, Tina D.
Gunnarsson, Candace
author_sort Chekan, Edward
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compares hospital costs and clinical outcomes for conventional laparoscopic, single-port, and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy from US hospitals. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years and undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with records in the Premier Hospital Database from 2009 through the second quarter of 2010. Patients were categorized into 3 groups—conventional laparoscopic, single port, or mini-laparoscopic—based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes and hospital charge descriptions for surgical tools used. A procedure was considered mini-laparoscopic if no single-port surgery products were identified in the charge master descriptions and the patient record showed that at least 1 product measuring <5 mm was used, not more than 1 product measuring >5 mm was used, and the measurements of the other products identified equaled 5 mm. Summary statistics were generated for all 3 groups. Multivariable analyses were performed on hospital costs and clinical outcomes. Models were adjusted for demographics, patient severity, comorbid conditions, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: In the outpatient setting, for single-port surgery, hospital costs were approximately $834 more than those for mini-laparoscopic surgery and $964 more than those for conventional laparoscopic surgery (P < .0001). Adverse events were significantly higher (P < .0001) for single-port surgery compared with mini-laparoscopic surgery (95% confidence interval for odds ratio, 1.38–2.68) and single-port surgery versus conventional surgery (95% confidence interval for odds ratio, 1.37–2.35). Mini-laparoscopic surgery hospital costs were significantly (P < .0001) lower than the costs for conventional surgery by $211, and there were no significant differences in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These findings should inform practice patterns, treatment guidelines, and payor policy in managing cholecystectomy patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3662743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36627432013-05-30 Costs and Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Single Port and Micro-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Chekan, Edward Moore, Matthew Hunter, Tina D. Gunnarsson, Candace JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compares hospital costs and clinical outcomes for conventional laparoscopic, single-port, and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy from US hospitals. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years and undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with records in the Premier Hospital Database from 2009 through the second quarter of 2010. Patients were categorized into 3 groups—conventional laparoscopic, single port, or mini-laparoscopic—based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes and hospital charge descriptions for surgical tools used. A procedure was considered mini-laparoscopic if no single-port surgery products were identified in the charge master descriptions and the patient record showed that at least 1 product measuring <5 mm was used, not more than 1 product measuring >5 mm was used, and the measurements of the other products identified equaled 5 mm. Summary statistics were generated for all 3 groups. Multivariable analyses were performed on hospital costs and clinical outcomes. Models were adjusted for demographics, patient severity, comorbid conditions, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: In the outpatient setting, for single-port surgery, hospital costs were approximately $834 more than those for mini-laparoscopic surgery and $964 more than those for conventional laparoscopic surgery (P < .0001). Adverse events were significantly higher (P < .0001) for single-port surgery compared with mini-laparoscopic surgery (95% confidence interval for odds ratio, 1.38–2.68) and single-port surgery versus conventional surgery (95% confidence interval for odds ratio, 1.37–2.35). Mini-laparoscopic surgery hospital costs were significantly (P < .0001) lower than the costs for conventional surgery by $211, and there were no significant differences in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These findings should inform practice patterns, treatment guidelines, and payor policy in managing cholecystectomy patients. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3662743/ /pubmed/23743370 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13517013317635 Text en © 2013 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Chekan, Edward
Moore, Matthew
Hunter, Tina D.
Gunnarsson, Candace
Costs and Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Single Port and Micro-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title Costs and Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Single Port and Micro-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_full Costs and Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Single Port and Micro-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_fullStr Costs and Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Single Port and Micro-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Costs and Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Single Port and Micro-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_short Costs and Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Single Port and Micro-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_sort costs and clinical outcomes of conventional single port and micro-laparoscopic cholecystectomy
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23743370
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13517013317635
work_keys_str_mv AT chekanedward costsandclinicaloutcomesofconventionalsingleportandmicrolaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT moorematthew costsandclinicaloutcomesofconventionalsingleportandmicrolaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT huntertinad costsandclinicaloutcomesofconventionalsingleportandmicrolaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT gunnarssoncandace costsandclinicaloutcomesofconventionalsingleportandmicrolaparoscopiccholecystectomy