Cargando…
Robotic Liver Resection: Initial Experience With Three-Arm Robotic and Single-Port Robotic Technique
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Robotic-assisted surgery offers a solution to fundamental limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery, and its use is gaining wide popularity. However, the application of this technology has yet to be established in hepatic surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23743372 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13517013317671 |
_version_ | 1782270880384024576 |
---|---|
author | Kandil, Emad Noureldine, Salem I. Saggi, Bob Buell, Joseph F. |
author_facet | Kandil, Emad Noureldine, Salem I. Saggi, Bob Buell, Joseph F. |
author_sort | Kandil, Emad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Robotic-assisted surgery offers a solution to fundamental limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery, and its use is gaining wide popularity. However, the application of this technology has yet to be established in hepatic surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of our prospectively collected liver surgery database was performed. Over a 6-month period, all consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted hepatic resection for a liver neoplasm were included. Demographics, operative time, and morbidity encountered were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 7 robotic-assisted liver resections were performed, including 2 robotic-assisted single-port access liver resections with the da Vinci-Si Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Sunnyvalle, Calif.) USA. The mean age was 44.6 years (range, 21–68 years); there were 5 male and 2 female patients. The mean operative time (± SD) was 61.4 ± 26.7 minutes; the mean operative console time (± SD) was 38.2 ± 23 minutes. No conversions were required. The mean blood loss was 100.7 mL (range, 10–200 mL). The mean hospital stay (± SD) was 2 ± 0.4 days. No postoperative morbidity related to the procedure or death was encountered. CONCLUSION: Our initial experience with robotic liver resection confirms that this technique is both feasible and safe. Robotic-assisted technology appears to improve the precision and ergonomics of single-access surgery while preserving the known benefits of laparoscopic surgery, including cosmesis, minimal morbidity, and faster recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3662746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36627462013-05-30 Robotic Liver Resection: Initial Experience With Three-Arm Robotic and Single-Port Robotic Technique Kandil, Emad Noureldine, Salem I. Saggi, Bob Buell, Joseph F. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Robotic-assisted surgery offers a solution to fundamental limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery, and its use is gaining wide popularity. However, the application of this technology has yet to be established in hepatic surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of our prospectively collected liver surgery database was performed. Over a 6-month period, all consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted hepatic resection for a liver neoplasm were included. Demographics, operative time, and morbidity encountered were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 7 robotic-assisted liver resections were performed, including 2 robotic-assisted single-port access liver resections with the da Vinci-Si Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Sunnyvalle, Calif.) USA. The mean age was 44.6 years (range, 21–68 years); there were 5 male and 2 female patients. The mean operative time (± SD) was 61.4 ± 26.7 minutes; the mean operative console time (± SD) was 38.2 ± 23 minutes. No conversions were required. The mean blood loss was 100.7 mL (range, 10–200 mL). The mean hospital stay (± SD) was 2 ± 0.4 days. No postoperative morbidity related to the procedure or death was encountered. CONCLUSION: Our initial experience with robotic liver resection confirms that this technique is both feasible and safe. Robotic-assisted technology appears to improve the precision and ergonomics of single-access surgery while preserving the known benefits of laparoscopic surgery, including cosmesis, minimal morbidity, and faster recovery. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3662746/ /pubmed/23743372 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13517013317671 Text en © 2013 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Kandil, Emad Noureldine, Salem I. Saggi, Bob Buell, Joseph F. Robotic Liver Resection: Initial Experience With Three-Arm Robotic and Single-Port Robotic Technique |
title | Robotic Liver Resection: Initial Experience With Three-Arm Robotic and Single-Port Robotic Technique |
title_full | Robotic Liver Resection: Initial Experience With Three-Arm Robotic and Single-Port Robotic Technique |
title_fullStr | Robotic Liver Resection: Initial Experience With Three-Arm Robotic and Single-Port Robotic Technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic Liver Resection: Initial Experience With Three-Arm Robotic and Single-Port Robotic Technique |
title_short | Robotic Liver Resection: Initial Experience With Three-Arm Robotic and Single-Port Robotic Technique |
title_sort | robotic liver resection: initial experience with three-arm robotic and single-port robotic technique |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23743372 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13517013317671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kandilemad roboticliverresectioninitialexperiencewiththreearmroboticandsingleportrobotictechnique AT noureldinesalemi roboticliverresectioninitialexperiencewiththreearmroboticandsingleportrobotictechnique AT saggibob roboticliverresectioninitialexperiencewiththreearmroboticandsingleportrobotictechnique AT buelljosephf roboticliverresectioninitialexperiencewiththreearmroboticandsingleportrobotictechnique |