Cargando…

How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany

BACKGROUND: In quasi-markets governance over healthcare providers is mediated by commissioners. Different commissioners apply different combinations of six methods of control ('media of power') for exercising governance: managerial performance, negotiation, discursive control, incentives,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheaff, Rod, Chambers, Naomi, Charles, Nigel, Exworthy, Mark, Mahon, Ann, Byng, Richard, Mannion, Russell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3663658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-S1-S8
_version_ 1782271012810784768
author Sheaff, Rod
Chambers, Naomi
Charles, Nigel
Exworthy, Mark
Mahon, Ann
Byng, Richard
Mannion, Russell
author_facet Sheaff, Rod
Chambers, Naomi
Charles, Nigel
Exworthy, Mark
Mahon, Ann
Byng, Richard
Mannion, Russell
author_sort Sheaff, Rod
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In quasi-markets governance over healthcare providers is mediated by commissioners. Different commissioners apply different combinations of six methods of control ('media of power') for exercising governance: managerial performance, negotiation, discursive control, incentives, competition and juridical control. This paper compares how English and German healthcare commissioners do so. METHODS: Systematic comparison of observational national-level case studies in terms of six media of power, using data from multiple sources. RESULTS: The comparison exposes and contrasts two basic generic modes of commissioning: 1. Surrogate planning (English NHS), in which a negotiated order involving micro-commissioning, provider competition, financial incentives and penalties are the dominant media of commissioner power over providers. 2. Case-mix commissioning (Germany), in which managerial performance, an 'episode based' negotiated order and juridical controls appear the dominant media of commissioner power. CONCLUSIONS: Governments do not necessarily maximise commissioners' power over providers by implementing as many media of power as possible because these media interact, some complementing and others inhibiting each other. In particular, patient choice of provider inhibits commissioners' use of provider competition as a means of control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3663658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36636582013-05-31 How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany Sheaff, Rod Chambers, Naomi Charles, Nigel Exworthy, Mark Mahon, Ann Byng, Richard Mannion, Russell BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: In quasi-markets governance over healthcare providers is mediated by commissioners. Different commissioners apply different combinations of six methods of control ('media of power') for exercising governance: managerial performance, negotiation, discursive control, incentives, competition and juridical control. This paper compares how English and German healthcare commissioners do so. METHODS: Systematic comparison of observational national-level case studies in terms of six media of power, using data from multiple sources. RESULTS: The comparison exposes and contrasts two basic generic modes of commissioning: 1. Surrogate planning (English NHS), in which a negotiated order involving micro-commissioning, provider competition, financial incentives and penalties are the dominant media of commissioner power over providers. 2. Case-mix commissioning (Germany), in which managerial performance, an 'episode based' negotiated order and juridical controls appear the dominant media of commissioner power. CONCLUSIONS: Governments do not necessarily maximise commissioners' power over providers by implementing as many media of power as possible because these media interact, some complementing and others inhibiting each other. In particular, patient choice of provider inhibits commissioners' use of provider competition as a means of control. BioMed Central 2013-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3663658/ /pubmed/23734631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-S1-S8 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sheaff et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Sheaff, Rod
Chambers, Naomi
Charles, Nigel
Exworthy, Mark
Mahon, Ann
Byng, Richard
Mannion, Russell
How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany
title How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany
title_full How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany
title_fullStr How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany
title_full_unstemmed How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany
title_short How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany
title_sort how managed a market? modes of commissioning in england and germany
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3663658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-S1-S8
work_keys_str_mv AT sheaffrod howmanagedamarketmodesofcommissioninginenglandandgermany
AT chambersnaomi howmanagedamarketmodesofcommissioninginenglandandgermany
AT charlesnigel howmanagedamarketmodesofcommissioninginenglandandgermany
AT exworthymark howmanagedamarketmodesofcommissioninginenglandandgermany
AT mahonann howmanagedamarketmodesofcommissioninginenglandandgermany
AT byngrichard howmanagedamarketmodesofcommissioninginenglandandgermany
AT mannionrussell howmanagedamarketmodesofcommissioninginenglandandgermany