Cargando…

Women's knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions in Kersa, eastern Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: Ethiopia has a long history of controlling malaria using vector control tools. Community knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions vary. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine malaria-related knowledge and perceptions among women and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gobena, Tesfaye, Berhane, Yemane, Worku, Alemayehu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23706162
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.20461
_version_ 1782271065675792384
author Gobena, Tesfaye
Berhane, Yemane
Worku, Alemayehu
author_facet Gobena, Tesfaye
Berhane, Yemane
Worku, Alemayehu
author_sort Gobena, Tesfaye
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ethiopia has a long history of controlling malaria using vector control tools. Community knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions vary. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine malaria-related knowledge and perceptions among women and to determine the use of malaria vector control interventions, mainly indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), among households in Kersa, Eastern Ethiopia. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Kersa Demographic Surveillance and Health Research Center (KDS-HRC) site from October to November 2010. A total of 2,867 households were involved in the study. The data was collected via face-to-face interviews with the women of the household using a pre-tested questionnaire. The questionnaire contained closed, semiclosed, and open-ended questions to explore the reasons for non-use of the interventions. Each knowledge, perception, and practice question was analyzed separately. RESULTS: Of the total women, 2,463 (85.9%) had heard of malaria. Of them, 1,413 (57.4%) mentioned malaria as a communicable disease. But, only 793 (56.1%) of them associated mosquito bites with malaria transmission. Seven hundred and ninety-eight of the respondents (27.8%) had IRS coverage, and of these, 59 (7.4%) had re-plastered their interior walls following the application of insecticides. Of net-owning households, 33.5% had used at least one long-lasting insecticide-treated net (LLIN) the night before the survey. Societal reasons such as holy days and dislike of the insecticide mainly due to fear of its effects on their livestock, were the main reasons for re-spondents replastering their walls. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of women had heard about malaria, but there was a knowledge gap regarding the route of malaria transmission. Less than one-third of the surveyed household houses were sprayed with insecticides, and a low proportion of net-owning households actually used their nets. Efforts must be made to ensure the correct channeling of information about malaria, particularly regarding the importance of using malaria vector control interventions. Furthermore, to maximize the benefit of the intervention in the district, IRC coverage and LLIN use need to be stronger.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3664061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36640612013-05-28 Women's knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions in Kersa, eastern Ethiopia Gobena, Tesfaye Berhane, Yemane Worku, Alemayehu Glob Health Action Original Article BACKGROUND: Ethiopia has a long history of controlling malaria using vector control tools. Community knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions vary. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine malaria-related knowledge and perceptions among women and to determine the use of malaria vector control interventions, mainly indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), among households in Kersa, Eastern Ethiopia. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Kersa Demographic Surveillance and Health Research Center (KDS-HRC) site from October to November 2010. A total of 2,867 households were involved in the study. The data was collected via face-to-face interviews with the women of the household using a pre-tested questionnaire. The questionnaire contained closed, semiclosed, and open-ended questions to explore the reasons for non-use of the interventions. Each knowledge, perception, and practice question was analyzed separately. RESULTS: Of the total women, 2,463 (85.9%) had heard of malaria. Of them, 1,413 (57.4%) mentioned malaria as a communicable disease. But, only 793 (56.1%) of them associated mosquito bites with malaria transmission. Seven hundred and ninety-eight of the respondents (27.8%) had IRS coverage, and of these, 59 (7.4%) had re-plastered their interior walls following the application of insecticides. Of net-owning households, 33.5% had used at least one long-lasting insecticide-treated net (LLIN) the night before the survey. Societal reasons such as holy days and dislike of the insecticide mainly due to fear of its effects on their livestock, were the main reasons for re-spondents replastering their walls. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of women had heard about malaria, but there was a knowledge gap regarding the route of malaria transmission. Less than one-third of the surveyed household houses were sprayed with insecticides, and a low proportion of net-owning households actually used their nets. Efforts must be made to ensure the correct channeling of information about malaria, particularly regarding the importance of using malaria vector control interventions. Furthermore, to maximize the benefit of the intervention in the district, IRC coverage and LLIN use need to be stronger. Co-Action Publishing 2013-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3664061/ /pubmed/23706162 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.20461 Text en © 2013 Tesfaye Gobena et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gobena, Tesfaye
Berhane, Yemane
Worku, Alemayehu
Women's knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions in Kersa, eastern Ethiopia
title Women's knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions in Kersa, eastern Ethiopia
title_full Women's knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions in Kersa, eastern Ethiopia
title_fullStr Women's knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions in Kersa, eastern Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Women's knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions in Kersa, eastern Ethiopia
title_short Women's knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions in Kersa, eastern Ethiopia
title_sort women's knowledge and perceptions of malaria and use of malaria vector control interventions in kersa, eastern ethiopia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23706162
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.20461
work_keys_str_mv AT gobenatesfaye womensknowledgeandperceptionsofmalariaanduseofmalariavectorcontrolinterventionsinkersaeasternethiopia
AT berhaneyemane womensknowledgeandperceptionsofmalariaanduseofmalariavectorcontrolinterventionsinkersaeasternethiopia
AT workualemayehu womensknowledgeandperceptionsofmalariaanduseofmalariavectorcontrolinterventionsinkersaeasternethiopia