Cargando…
Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention
There has been much debate regarding how much information humans can extract from their environment without the use of limited attentional resources. In a recent study, Theeuwes et al. (2008) argued that even detection of simple feature targets is not possible without selection by focal attention. S...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00284 |
_version_ | 1782271082497048576 |
---|---|
author | Moher, Jeff Ashinoff, Brandon K. Egeth, Howard E. |
author_facet | Moher, Jeff Ashinoff, Brandon K. Egeth, Howard E. |
author_sort | Moher, Jeff |
collection | PubMed |
description | There has been much debate regarding how much information humans can extract from their environment without the use of limited attentional resources. In a recent study, Theeuwes et al. (2008) argued that even detection of simple feature targets is not possible without selection by focal attention. Supporting this claim, they found response time (RT) benefits in a simple feature (color) detection task when a target letter's identity was repeated on consecutive trials, suggesting that the letter was selected by focal attention and identified prior to detection. This intertrial repetition benefit remained even when observers were required to simultaneously identify a central digit. However, we found that intertrial repetition benefits disappeared when a simple color target was presented among a heterogeneously (rather than homogeneously) colored set of distractors, thus reducing its bottom–up salience. Still, detection performance remained high. Thus, detection performance was unaffected by whether a letter was focally attended and identified prior to detection or not. Intertrial identity repetition benefits also disappeared when observers were required to perform a simultaneous, attention-demanding central task (Experiment 2), or when unfamiliar Chinese characters were used (Experiment 3). Together, these results suggest that while shifts of focal attention can be affected by target salience, by the availability of excess cognitive resources, and by target familiarity, detection performance itself is unaffected by these manipulations and is thus unaffected by the deployment of focal attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3664323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36643232013-06-07 Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention Moher, Jeff Ashinoff, Brandon K. Egeth, Howard E. Front Psychol Psychology There has been much debate regarding how much information humans can extract from their environment without the use of limited attentional resources. In a recent study, Theeuwes et al. (2008) argued that even detection of simple feature targets is not possible without selection by focal attention. Supporting this claim, they found response time (RT) benefits in a simple feature (color) detection task when a target letter's identity was repeated on consecutive trials, suggesting that the letter was selected by focal attention and identified prior to detection. This intertrial repetition benefit remained even when observers were required to simultaneously identify a central digit. However, we found that intertrial repetition benefits disappeared when a simple color target was presented among a heterogeneously (rather than homogeneously) colored set of distractors, thus reducing its bottom–up salience. Still, detection performance remained high. Thus, detection performance was unaffected by whether a letter was focally attended and identified prior to detection or not. Intertrial identity repetition benefits also disappeared when observers were required to perform a simultaneous, attention-demanding central task (Experiment 2), or when unfamiliar Chinese characters were used (Experiment 3). Together, these results suggest that while shifts of focal attention can be affected by target salience, by the availability of excess cognitive resources, and by target familiarity, detection performance itself is unaffected by these manipulations and is thus unaffected by the deployment of focal attention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3664323/ /pubmed/23750142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00284 Text en Copyright © 2013 Moher, Ashinoff and Egeth. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Moher, Jeff Ashinoff, Brandon K. Egeth, Howard E. Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention |
title | Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention |
title_full | Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention |
title_fullStr | Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention |
title_short | Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention |
title_sort | detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moherjeff detectionisunaffectedbythedeploymentoffocalattention AT ashinoffbrandonk detectionisunaffectedbythedeploymentoffocalattention AT egethhowarde detectionisunaffectedbythedeploymentoffocalattention |