Cargando…

Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention

There has been much debate regarding how much information humans can extract from their environment without the use of limited attentional resources. In a recent study, Theeuwes et al. (2008) argued that even detection of simple feature targets is not possible without selection by focal attention. S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moher, Jeff, Ashinoff, Brandon K., Egeth, Howard E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00284
_version_ 1782271082497048576
author Moher, Jeff
Ashinoff, Brandon K.
Egeth, Howard E.
author_facet Moher, Jeff
Ashinoff, Brandon K.
Egeth, Howard E.
author_sort Moher, Jeff
collection PubMed
description There has been much debate regarding how much information humans can extract from their environment without the use of limited attentional resources. In a recent study, Theeuwes et al. (2008) argued that even detection of simple feature targets is not possible without selection by focal attention. Supporting this claim, they found response time (RT) benefits in a simple feature (color) detection task when a target letter's identity was repeated on consecutive trials, suggesting that the letter was selected by focal attention and identified prior to detection. This intertrial repetition benefit remained even when observers were required to simultaneously identify a central digit. However, we found that intertrial repetition benefits disappeared when a simple color target was presented among a heterogeneously (rather than homogeneously) colored set of distractors, thus reducing its bottom–up salience. Still, detection performance remained high. Thus, detection performance was unaffected by whether a letter was focally attended and identified prior to detection or not. Intertrial identity repetition benefits also disappeared when observers were required to perform a simultaneous, attention-demanding central task (Experiment 2), or when unfamiliar Chinese characters were used (Experiment 3). Together, these results suggest that while shifts of focal attention can be affected by target salience, by the availability of excess cognitive resources, and by target familiarity, detection performance itself is unaffected by these manipulations and is thus unaffected by the deployment of focal attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3664323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36643232013-06-07 Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention Moher, Jeff Ashinoff, Brandon K. Egeth, Howard E. Front Psychol Psychology There has been much debate regarding how much information humans can extract from their environment without the use of limited attentional resources. In a recent study, Theeuwes et al. (2008) argued that even detection of simple feature targets is not possible without selection by focal attention. Supporting this claim, they found response time (RT) benefits in a simple feature (color) detection task when a target letter's identity was repeated on consecutive trials, suggesting that the letter was selected by focal attention and identified prior to detection. This intertrial repetition benefit remained even when observers were required to simultaneously identify a central digit. However, we found that intertrial repetition benefits disappeared when a simple color target was presented among a heterogeneously (rather than homogeneously) colored set of distractors, thus reducing its bottom–up salience. Still, detection performance remained high. Thus, detection performance was unaffected by whether a letter was focally attended and identified prior to detection or not. Intertrial identity repetition benefits also disappeared when observers were required to perform a simultaneous, attention-demanding central task (Experiment 2), or when unfamiliar Chinese characters were used (Experiment 3). Together, these results suggest that while shifts of focal attention can be affected by target salience, by the availability of excess cognitive resources, and by target familiarity, detection performance itself is unaffected by these manipulations and is thus unaffected by the deployment of focal attention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3664323/ /pubmed/23750142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00284 Text en Copyright © 2013 Moher, Ashinoff and Egeth. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Moher, Jeff
Ashinoff, Brandon K.
Egeth, Howard E.
Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention
title Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention
title_full Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention
title_fullStr Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention
title_full_unstemmed Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention
title_short Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention
title_sort detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00284
work_keys_str_mv AT moherjeff detectionisunaffectedbythedeploymentoffocalattention
AT ashinoffbrandonk detectionisunaffectedbythedeploymentoffocalattention
AT egethhowarde detectionisunaffectedbythedeploymentoffocalattention