Cargando…

INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications

INTRODUCTION: This paper describes a planned process evaluation of the Use of a Multidrug Pill In Reducing Cardiovascular Events (UMPIRE) trial, one of several randomised clinical trials taking place globally to assess the potential of cardiovascular drugs as a fixed-dose combination (polypill) in c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salam, Abdul, Stewart, Frances, Singh, Kavita, Thom, Simon, Williams, Hilarie Jane, Patel, Anushka, Jan, Stephen, Laba, Tracey, Prabhakaran, Dorairaj, Maulik, Pallab, Day, Sophie, Ward, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23793693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002313
_version_ 1782271085816840192
author Salam, Abdul
Stewart, Frances
Singh, Kavita
Thom, Simon
Williams, Hilarie Jane
Patel, Anushka
Jan, Stephen
Laba, Tracey
Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
Maulik, Pallab
Day, Sophie
Ward, Helen
author_facet Salam, Abdul
Stewart, Frances
Singh, Kavita
Thom, Simon
Williams, Hilarie Jane
Patel, Anushka
Jan, Stephen
Laba, Tracey
Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
Maulik, Pallab
Day, Sophie
Ward, Helen
author_sort Salam, Abdul
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This paper describes a planned process evaluation of the Use of a Multidrug Pill In Reducing Cardiovascular Events (UMPIRE) trial, one of several randomised clinical trials taking place globally to assess the potential of cardiovascular drugs as a fixed-dose combination (polypill) in cardiovascular disease prevention. A fixed-dose combination may be a promising strategy for promoting adherence to medication; alleviating pill burden through simplifying regimens and reducing cost. This process evaluation will complement the UMPIRE trial by using qualitative research methods to inform understanding of the complex interplay of factors that underpin trial outcomes. METHODS: A series of semistructured, in-depth interviews with local health professionals and UMPIRE trial participants in India and the UK will be undertaken. The aim is to understand their views and experiences of the trial context and of day-to-day use of medications more generally. The grounded theory approach will be used to analyse data and help inform the processes of the UMPIRE trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval for all sites in the UK and India where trial participant interviews will be undertaken. The process evaluation will help inform and enhance the understanding of the UMPIRE trial results and its applicability to clinical practice as well as shaping policy regarding strategies for improving cardiovascular medication adherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3664347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36643472013-05-31 INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications Salam, Abdul Stewart, Frances Singh, Kavita Thom, Simon Williams, Hilarie Jane Patel, Anushka Jan, Stephen Laba, Tracey Prabhakaran, Dorairaj Maulik, Pallab Day, Sophie Ward, Helen BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: This paper describes a planned process evaluation of the Use of a Multidrug Pill In Reducing Cardiovascular Events (UMPIRE) trial, one of several randomised clinical trials taking place globally to assess the potential of cardiovascular drugs as a fixed-dose combination (polypill) in cardiovascular disease prevention. A fixed-dose combination may be a promising strategy for promoting adherence to medication; alleviating pill burden through simplifying regimens and reducing cost. This process evaluation will complement the UMPIRE trial by using qualitative research methods to inform understanding of the complex interplay of factors that underpin trial outcomes. METHODS: A series of semistructured, in-depth interviews with local health professionals and UMPIRE trial participants in India and the UK will be undertaken. The aim is to understand their views and experiences of the trial context and of day-to-day use of medications more generally. The grounded theory approach will be used to analyse data and help inform the processes of the UMPIRE trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval for all sites in the UK and India where trial participant interviews will be undertaken. The process evaluation will help inform and enhance the understanding of the UMPIRE trial results and its applicability to clinical practice as well as shaping policy regarding strategies for improving cardiovascular medication adherence. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3664347/ /pubmed/23793693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002313 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Salam, Abdul
Stewart, Frances
Singh, Kavita
Thom, Simon
Williams, Hilarie Jane
Patel, Anushka
Jan, Stephen
Laba, Tracey
Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
Maulik, Pallab
Day, Sophie
Ward, Helen
INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications
title INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications
title_full INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications
title_fullStr INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications
title_full_unstemmed INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications
title_short INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications
title_sort interpreting the processes of the umpire trial (input): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (fdc) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23793693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002313
work_keys_str_mv AT salamabdul interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT stewartfrances interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT singhkavita interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT thomsimon interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT williamshilariejane interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT patelanushka interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT janstephen interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT labatracey interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT prabhakarandorairaj interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT maulikpallab interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT daysophie interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT wardhelen interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications