Cargando…
INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications
INTRODUCTION: This paper describes a planned process evaluation of the Use of a Multidrug Pill In Reducing Cardiovascular Events (UMPIRE) trial, one of several randomised clinical trials taking place globally to assess the potential of cardiovascular drugs as a fixed-dose combination (polypill) in c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23793693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002313 |
_version_ | 1782271085816840192 |
---|---|
author | Salam, Abdul Stewart, Frances Singh, Kavita Thom, Simon Williams, Hilarie Jane Patel, Anushka Jan, Stephen Laba, Tracey Prabhakaran, Dorairaj Maulik, Pallab Day, Sophie Ward, Helen |
author_facet | Salam, Abdul Stewart, Frances Singh, Kavita Thom, Simon Williams, Hilarie Jane Patel, Anushka Jan, Stephen Laba, Tracey Prabhakaran, Dorairaj Maulik, Pallab Day, Sophie Ward, Helen |
author_sort | Salam, Abdul |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This paper describes a planned process evaluation of the Use of a Multidrug Pill In Reducing Cardiovascular Events (UMPIRE) trial, one of several randomised clinical trials taking place globally to assess the potential of cardiovascular drugs as a fixed-dose combination (polypill) in cardiovascular disease prevention. A fixed-dose combination may be a promising strategy for promoting adherence to medication; alleviating pill burden through simplifying regimens and reducing cost. This process evaluation will complement the UMPIRE trial by using qualitative research methods to inform understanding of the complex interplay of factors that underpin trial outcomes. METHODS: A series of semistructured, in-depth interviews with local health professionals and UMPIRE trial participants in India and the UK will be undertaken. The aim is to understand their views and experiences of the trial context and of day-to-day use of medications more generally. The grounded theory approach will be used to analyse data and help inform the processes of the UMPIRE trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval for all sites in the UK and India where trial participant interviews will be undertaken. The process evaluation will help inform and enhance the understanding of the UMPIRE trial results and its applicability to clinical practice as well as shaping policy regarding strategies for improving cardiovascular medication adherence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3664347 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36643472013-05-31 INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications Salam, Abdul Stewart, Frances Singh, Kavita Thom, Simon Williams, Hilarie Jane Patel, Anushka Jan, Stephen Laba, Tracey Prabhakaran, Dorairaj Maulik, Pallab Day, Sophie Ward, Helen BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: This paper describes a planned process evaluation of the Use of a Multidrug Pill In Reducing Cardiovascular Events (UMPIRE) trial, one of several randomised clinical trials taking place globally to assess the potential of cardiovascular drugs as a fixed-dose combination (polypill) in cardiovascular disease prevention. A fixed-dose combination may be a promising strategy for promoting adherence to medication; alleviating pill burden through simplifying regimens and reducing cost. This process evaluation will complement the UMPIRE trial by using qualitative research methods to inform understanding of the complex interplay of factors that underpin trial outcomes. METHODS: A series of semistructured, in-depth interviews with local health professionals and UMPIRE trial participants in India and the UK will be undertaken. The aim is to understand their views and experiences of the trial context and of day-to-day use of medications more generally. The grounded theory approach will be used to analyse data and help inform the processes of the UMPIRE trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval for all sites in the UK and India where trial participant interviews will be undertaken. The process evaluation will help inform and enhance the understanding of the UMPIRE trial results and its applicability to clinical practice as well as shaping policy regarding strategies for improving cardiovascular medication adherence. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3664347/ /pubmed/23793693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002313 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Salam, Abdul Stewart, Frances Singh, Kavita Thom, Simon Williams, Hilarie Jane Patel, Anushka Jan, Stephen Laba, Tracey Prabhakaran, Dorairaj Maulik, Pallab Day, Sophie Ward, Helen INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications |
title | INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications |
title_full | INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications |
title_fullStr | INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications |
title_full_unstemmed | INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications |
title_short | INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications |
title_sort | interpreting the processes of the umpire trial (input): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (fdc) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23793693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salamabdul interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications AT stewartfrances interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications AT singhkavita interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications AT thomsimon interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications AT williamshilariejane interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications AT patelanushka interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications AT janstephen interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications AT labatracey interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications AT prabhakarandorairaj interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications AT maulikpallab interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications AT daysophie interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications AT wardhelen interpretingtheprocessesoftheumpiretrialinputprotocolforaqualitativeprocessevaluationstudyofafixeddosecombinationfdcstrategytoimproveadherencetocardiovascularmedications |