Cargando…
Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to (1) evaluate the extent to which doctors in New Zealand would be willing to answer honestly questions about their care of patients at the end of their lives and (2) identify the assurances that would encourage this. Results were compared with findings from a previous pilot st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23793694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002598 |
_version_ | 1782271086723858432 |
---|---|
author | Merry, Alan F Moharib, Magdi Devcich, Daniel A Webster, M Louise Ives, Jonathan Draper, Heather |
author_facet | Merry, Alan F Moharib, Magdi Devcich, Daniel A Webster, M Louise Ives, Jonathan Draper, Heather |
author_sort | Merry, Alan F |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We aimed to (1) evaluate the extent to which doctors in New Zealand would be willing to answer honestly questions about their care of patients at the end of their lives and (2) identify the assurances that would encourage this. Results were compared with findings from a previous pilot study from the UK. DESIGN: Survey study involving a mailed questionnaire. SETTING: New Zealand hospital and community-based medical care settings. PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 800 doctors in New Zealand who were vocationally registered with the Medical Council of New Zealand in disciplines involving caring for patients at the end of their lives. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Willingness to provide honest answers about various aspects of end-of-life care; assurances that might increase willingness to provide honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 436 doctors. The majority of respondents (59.9–91.5%) indicated willingness to provide honest answers to such questions. However, more than a third of doctors were unwilling to give honest answers to certain questions regarding euthanasia. These results are comparable with the UK data. Complete anonymity was the assurance most likely to encourage honest answering, with most of the respondents preferring the use of anonymous written replies. Respondents were less reassured by survey endorsements from regulatory bodies. Themes in free comments included the deterrent effect of medicolegal consequences, fear of censure from society, peers and the media and concerns about the motivations and potential uses of such research. CONCLUSIONS: Many New Zealand doctors were willing to give honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices, particularly if anonymity was guaranteed; others, however, expressed doubts or indicated that they would not be willing to provide honest answers to questions of this sort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3664351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36643512013-05-31 Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study Merry, Alan F Moharib, Magdi Devcich, Daniel A Webster, M Louise Ives, Jonathan Draper, Heather BMJ Open Ethics OBJECTIVES: We aimed to (1) evaluate the extent to which doctors in New Zealand would be willing to answer honestly questions about their care of patients at the end of their lives and (2) identify the assurances that would encourage this. Results were compared with findings from a previous pilot study from the UK. DESIGN: Survey study involving a mailed questionnaire. SETTING: New Zealand hospital and community-based medical care settings. PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 800 doctors in New Zealand who were vocationally registered with the Medical Council of New Zealand in disciplines involving caring for patients at the end of their lives. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Willingness to provide honest answers about various aspects of end-of-life care; assurances that might increase willingness to provide honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 436 doctors. The majority of respondents (59.9–91.5%) indicated willingness to provide honest answers to such questions. However, more than a third of doctors were unwilling to give honest answers to certain questions regarding euthanasia. These results are comparable with the UK data. Complete anonymity was the assurance most likely to encourage honest answering, with most of the respondents preferring the use of anonymous written replies. Respondents were less reassured by survey endorsements from regulatory bodies. Themes in free comments included the deterrent effect of medicolegal consequences, fear of censure from society, peers and the media and concerns about the motivations and potential uses of such research. CONCLUSIONS: Many New Zealand doctors were willing to give honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices, particularly if anonymity was guaranteed; others, however, expressed doubts or indicated that they would not be willing to provide honest answers to questions of this sort. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3664351/ /pubmed/23793694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002598 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Ethics Merry, Alan F Moharib, Magdi Devcich, Daniel A Webster, M Louise Ives, Jonathan Draper, Heather Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study |
title | Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Ethics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23793694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002598 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merryalanf doctorswillingnesstogivehonestanswersaboutendoflifepracticesacrosssectionalstudy AT moharibmagdi doctorswillingnesstogivehonestanswersaboutendoflifepracticesacrosssectionalstudy AT devcichdaniela doctorswillingnesstogivehonestanswersaboutendoflifepracticesacrosssectionalstudy AT webstermlouise doctorswillingnesstogivehonestanswersaboutendoflifepracticesacrosssectionalstudy AT ivesjonathan doctorswillingnesstogivehonestanswersaboutendoflifepracticesacrosssectionalstudy AT draperheather doctorswillingnesstogivehonestanswersaboutendoflifepracticesacrosssectionalstudy |