Cargando…

Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to (1) evaluate the extent to which doctors in New Zealand would be willing to answer honestly questions about their care of patients at the end of their lives and (2) identify the assurances that would encourage this. Results were compared with findings from a previous pilot st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merry, Alan F, Moharib, Magdi, Devcich, Daniel A, Webster, M Louise, Ives, Jonathan, Draper, Heather
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23793694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002598
_version_ 1782271086723858432
author Merry, Alan F
Moharib, Magdi
Devcich, Daniel A
Webster, M Louise
Ives, Jonathan
Draper, Heather
author_facet Merry, Alan F
Moharib, Magdi
Devcich, Daniel A
Webster, M Louise
Ives, Jonathan
Draper, Heather
author_sort Merry, Alan F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We aimed to (1) evaluate the extent to which doctors in New Zealand would be willing to answer honestly questions about their care of patients at the end of their lives and (2) identify the assurances that would encourage this. Results were compared with findings from a previous pilot study from the UK. DESIGN: Survey study involving a mailed questionnaire. SETTING: New Zealand hospital and community-based medical care settings. PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 800 doctors in New Zealand who were vocationally registered with the Medical Council of New Zealand in disciplines involving caring for patients at the end of their lives. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Willingness to provide honest answers about various aspects of end-of-life care; assurances that might increase willingness to provide honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 436 doctors. The majority of respondents (59.9–91.5%) indicated willingness to provide honest answers to such questions. However, more than a third of doctors were unwilling to give honest answers to certain questions regarding euthanasia. These results are comparable with the UK data. Complete anonymity was the assurance most likely to encourage honest answering, with most of the respondents preferring the use of anonymous written replies. Respondents were less reassured by survey endorsements from regulatory bodies. Themes in free comments included the deterrent effect of medicolegal consequences, fear of censure from society, peers and the media and concerns about the motivations and potential uses of such research. CONCLUSIONS: Many New Zealand doctors were willing to give honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices, particularly if anonymity was guaranteed; others, however, expressed doubts or indicated that they would not be willing to provide honest answers to questions of this sort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3664351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36643512013-05-31 Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study Merry, Alan F Moharib, Magdi Devcich, Daniel A Webster, M Louise Ives, Jonathan Draper, Heather BMJ Open Ethics OBJECTIVES: We aimed to (1) evaluate the extent to which doctors in New Zealand would be willing to answer honestly questions about their care of patients at the end of their lives and (2) identify the assurances that would encourage this. Results were compared with findings from a previous pilot study from the UK. DESIGN: Survey study involving a mailed questionnaire. SETTING: New Zealand hospital and community-based medical care settings. PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 800 doctors in New Zealand who were vocationally registered with the Medical Council of New Zealand in disciplines involving caring for patients at the end of their lives. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Willingness to provide honest answers about various aspects of end-of-life care; assurances that might increase willingness to provide honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 436 doctors. The majority of respondents (59.9–91.5%) indicated willingness to provide honest answers to such questions. However, more than a third of doctors were unwilling to give honest answers to certain questions regarding euthanasia. These results are comparable with the UK data. Complete anonymity was the assurance most likely to encourage honest answering, with most of the respondents preferring the use of anonymous written replies. Respondents were less reassured by survey endorsements from regulatory bodies. Themes in free comments included the deterrent effect of medicolegal consequences, fear of censure from society, peers and the media and concerns about the motivations and potential uses of such research. CONCLUSIONS: Many New Zealand doctors were willing to give honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices, particularly if anonymity was guaranteed; others, however, expressed doubts or indicated that they would not be willing to provide honest answers to questions of this sort. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3664351/ /pubmed/23793694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002598 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Ethics
Merry, Alan F
Moharib, Magdi
Devcich, Daniel A
Webster, M Louise
Ives, Jonathan
Draper, Heather
Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study
title Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study
title_full Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study
title_short Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study
title_sort doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23793694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002598
work_keys_str_mv AT merryalanf doctorswillingnesstogivehonestanswersaboutendoflifepracticesacrosssectionalstudy
AT moharibmagdi doctorswillingnesstogivehonestanswersaboutendoflifepracticesacrosssectionalstudy
AT devcichdaniela doctorswillingnesstogivehonestanswersaboutendoflifepracticesacrosssectionalstudy
AT webstermlouise doctorswillingnesstogivehonestanswersaboutendoflifepracticesacrosssectionalstudy
AT ivesjonathan doctorswillingnesstogivehonestanswersaboutendoflifepracticesacrosssectionalstudy
AT draperheather doctorswillingnesstogivehonestanswersaboutendoflifepracticesacrosssectionalstudy