Cargando…
Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study
AIMS: To report the refractive error difference (RED) between parents and their children and the estimated single generational myopic shift in an urban area in China. METHODS: 395 children aged 6–17 years and their parents, who had been enrolled in the Beijing Myopia Progression Study were included....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23590854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302468 |
_version_ | 1782271092655652864 |
---|---|
author | Liang, Yuan Bo Lin, Zhong Vasudevan, Balamurali Jhanji, Vishal Young, Alvin Gao, Tie Ying Rong, Shi Song Wang, Ning Li Ciuffreda, Kenneth J |
author_facet | Liang, Yuan Bo Lin, Zhong Vasudevan, Balamurali Jhanji, Vishal Young, Alvin Gao, Tie Ying Rong, Shi Song Wang, Ning Li Ciuffreda, Kenneth J |
author_sort | Liang, Yuan Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To report the refractive error difference (RED) between parents and their children and the estimated single generational myopic shift in an urban area in China. METHODS: 395 children aged 6–17 years and their parents, who had been enrolled in the Beijing Myopia Progression Study were included. Cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refraction of the children and parents were performed, respectively. RED was defined as the difference between the average parental spherical equivalent (SE) and the average SE of their children. Binomial fitted curves of RED were plotted as a function of the children's age. Generational myopic shift was defined as the estimated RED according to the prediction model at the age of 18 years. RESULTS: 395 families were enrolled. The RED was positively correlated with the children's age (r(spearman)=0.58, p<0.001). The RED (median (25th and 75th percentile)) was −1.88 (−3.23 to −1.00) dioptres (D) in children at 6.0–7.9 years of age, and it increased to 1.53 (−0.12 to 3.44) D in children at 16.0–17.9 years of age. The SE of the children approached the average SE of their parents at the age of 11 years. At the age of 18 years, the children's estimated myopic shift would be 1.94 D. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, children's refractive errors at the age of 11 years were already similar to their parents. Moreover, the estimated myopia in children at the age of 18 years would be up to 2.0 D higher than their parents. This remarkable single-generation myopic shift indicates that there are likely effects of environmental factors on myopia development in urban Chinese children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3664384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36643842013-05-31 Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study Liang, Yuan Bo Lin, Zhong Vasudevan, Balamurali Jhanji, Vishal Young, Alvin Gao, Tie Ying Rong, Shi Song Wang, Ning Li Ciuffreda, Kenneth J Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science AIMS: To report the refractive error difference (RED) between parents and their children and the estimated single generational myopic shift in an urban area in China. METHODS: 395 children aged 6–17 years and their parents, who had been enrolled in the Beijing Myopia Progression Study were included. Cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refraction of the children and parents were performed, respectively. RED was defined as the difference between the average parental spherical equivalent (SE) and the average SE of their children. Binomial fitted curves of RED were plotted as a function of the children's age. Generational myopic shift was defined as the estimated RED according to the prediction model at the age of 18 years. RESULTS: 395 families were enrolled. The RED was positively correlated with the children's age (r(spearman)=0.58, p<0.001). The RED (median (25th and 75th percentile)) was −1.88 (−3.23 to −1.00) dioptres (D) in children at 6.0–7.9 years of age, and it increased to 1.53 (−0.12 to 3.44) D in children at 16.0–17.9 years of age. The SE of the children approached the average SE of their parents at the age of 11 years. At the age of 18 years, the children's estimated myopic shift would be 1.94 D. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, children's refractive errors at the age of 11 years were already similar to their parents. Moreover, the estimated myopia in children at the age of 18 years would be up to 2.0 D higher than their parents. This remarkable single-generation myopic shift indicates that there are likely effects of environmental factors on myopia development in urban Chinese children. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-06 2013-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3664384/ /pubmed/23590854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302468 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Liang, Yuan Bo Lin, Zhong Vasudevan, Balamurali Jhanji, Vishal Young, Alvin Gao, Tie Ying Rong, Shi Song Wang, Ning Li Ciuffreda, Kenneth J Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study |
title | Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study |
title_full | Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study |
title_fullStr | Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study |
title_short | Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study |
title_sort | generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the beijing myopia progression study |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23590854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302468 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liangyuanbo generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy AT linzhong generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy AT vasudevanbalamurali generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy AT jhanjivishal generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy AT youngalvin generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy AT gaotieying generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy AT rongshisong generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy AT wangningli generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy AT ciuffredakennethj generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy |