Cargando…

Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study

AIMS: To report the refractive error difference (RED) between parents and their children and the estimated single generational myopic shift in an urban area in China. METHODS: 395 children aged 6–17 years and their parents, who had been enrolled in the Beijing Myopia Progression Study were included....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Yuan Bo, Lin, Zhong, Vasudevan, Balamurali, Jhanji, Vishal, Young, Alvin, Gao, Tie Ying, Rong, Shi Song, Wang, Ning Li, Ciuffreda, Kenneth J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23590854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302468
_version_ 1782271092655652864
author Liang, Yuan Bo
Lin, Zhong
Vasudevan, Balamurali
Jhanji, Vishal
Young, Alvin
Gao, Tie Ying
Rong, Shi Song
Wang, Ning Li
Ciuffreda, Kenneth J
author_facet Liang, Yuan Bo
Lin, Zhong
Vasudevan, Balamurali
Jhanji, Vishal
Young, Alvin
Gao, Tie Ying
Rong, Shi Song
Wang, Ning Li
Ciuffreda, Kenneth J
author_sort Liang, Yuan Bo
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To report the refractive error difference (RED) between parents and their children and the estimated single generational myopic shift in an urban area in China. METHODS: 395 children aged 6–17 years and their parents, who had been enrolled in the Beijing Myopia Progression Study were included. Cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refraction of the children and parents were performed, respectively. RED was defined as the difference between the average parental spherical equivalent (SE) and the average SE of their children. Binomial fitted curves of RED were plotted as a function of the children's age. Generational myopic shift was defined as the estimated RED according to the prediction model at the age of 18 years. RESULTS: 395 families were enrolled. The RED was positively correlated with the children's age (r(spearman)=0.58, p<0.001). The RED (median (25th and 75th percentile)) was −1.88 (−3.23 to −1.00) dioptres (D) in children at 6.0–7.9 years of age, and it increased to 1.53 (−0.12 to 3.44) D in children at 16.0–17.9 years of age. The SE of the children approached the average SE of their parents at the age of 11 years. At the age of 18 years, the children's estimated myopic shift would be 1.94 D. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, children's refractive errors at the age of 11 years were already similar to their parents. Moreover, the estimated myopia in children at the age of 18 years would be up to 2.0 D higher than their parents. This remarkable single-generation myopic shift indicates that there are likely effects of environmental factors on myopia development in urban Chinese children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3664384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36643842013-05-31 Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study Liang, Yuan Bo Lin, Zhong Vasudevan, Balamurali Jhanji, Vishal Young, Alvin Gao, Tie Ying Rong, Shi Song Wang, Ning Li Ciuffreda, Kenneth J Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science AIMS: To report the refractive error difference (RED) between parents and their children and the estimated single generational myopic shift in an urban area in China. METHODS: 395 children aged 6–17 years and their parents, who had been enrolled in the Beijing Myopia Progression Study were included. Cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refraction of the children and parents were performed, respectively. RED was defined as the difference between the average parental spherical equivalent (SE) and the average SE of their children. Binomial fitted curves of RED were plotted as a function of the children's age. Generational myopic shift was defined as the estimated RED according to the prediction model at the age of 18 years. RESULTS: 395 families were enrolled. The RED was positively correlated with the children's age (r(spearman)=0.58, p<0.001). The RED (median (25th and 75th percentile)) was −1.88 (−3.23 to −1.00) dioptres (D) in children at 6.0–7.9 years of age, and it increased to 1.53 (−0.12 to 3.44) D in children at 16.0–17.9 years of age. The SE of the children approached the average SE of their parents at the age of 11 years. At the age of 18 years, the children's estimated myopic shift would be 1.94 D. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, children's refractive errors at the age of 11 years were already similar to their parents. Moreover, the estimated myopia in children at the age of 18 years would be up to 2.0 D higher than their parents. This remarkable single-generation myopic shift indicates that there are likely effects of environmental factors on myopia development in urban Chinese children. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-06 2013-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3664384/ /pubmed/23590854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302468 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Liang, Yuan Bo
Lin, Zhong
Vasudevan, Balamurali
Jhanji, Vishal
Young, Alvin
Gao, Tie Ying
Rong, Shi Song
Wang, Ning Li
Ciuffreda, Kenneth J
Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study
title Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study
title_full Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study
title_fullStr Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study
title_full_unstemmed Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study
title_short Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study
title_sort generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the beijing myopia progression study
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23590854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302468
work_keys_str_mv AT liangyuanbo generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy
AT linzhong generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy
AT vasudevanbalamurali generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy
AT jhanjivishal generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy
AT youngalvin generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy
AT gaotieying generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy
AT rongshisong generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy
AT wangningli generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy
AT ciuffredakennethj generationaldifferenceofrefractiveerrorinthebaselinestudyofthebeijingmyopiaprogressionstudy