Cargando…
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius
INTRODUCTION: Surgical management of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the distal radius (GCTDR) remains controversial due to risk of local recurrence (LR) offset by functional limitations which result from en-bloc resection. This study aims to determine the oncologic and functional outcomes of wide excis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23730371 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010103 |
_version_ | 1782271102003707904 |
---|---|
author | Pazionis, Theresa J.C Alradwan, Hussain Deheshi, Benjamin M Turcotte, Robert Farrokhyar, Forough Ghert, Michelle |
author_facet | Pazionis, Theresa J.C Alradwan, Hussain Deheshi, Benjamin M Turcotte, Robert Farrokhyar, Forough Ghert, Michelle |
author_sort | Pazionis, Theresa J.C |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Surgical management of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the distal radius (GCTDR) remains controversial due to risk of local recurrence (LR) offset by functional limitations which result from en-bloc resection. This study aims to determine the oncologic and functional outcomes of wide excision (WE) vs intralesional curettage (IC) of GCTDR. METHODS: A complete search of the applicable literature was done. Included studies reported on patients from the same cohort who were surgically treated for GCTDR with WE or IC. Two reviewers independently assessed all papers. The primary outcome measure was LR. RESULTS: One-hundred-forty-one patients from six studies were included: 60 treated with WE, and 81 with IC. Five WE patients (8%) suffered LR whereas 25 IC patients (31%) did. The odds of LR were three times less in the WE group vs the IC group. MSTS1993 scores, where available, were on average 'good' with WE and 'excellent' with IC. CONCLUSIONS: Within statistical limitations the data support an attempt, where feasible, at wrist joint preservation and superior function with IC. Intralesional curettage is reasonable when the functional benefit outweighs the risk of recurrence as is the case in many cases of GCT of the distal radius. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3664443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36644432013-05-31 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius Pazionis, Theresa J.C Alradwan, Hussain Deheshi, Benjamin M Turcotte, Robert Farrokhyar, Forough Ghert, Michelle Open Orthop J Article INTRODUCTION: Surgical management of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the distal radius (GCTDR) remains controversial due to risk of local recurrence (LR) offset by functional limitations which result from en-bloc resection. This study aims to determine the oncologic and functional outcomes of wide excision (WE) vs intralesional curettage (IC) of GCTDR. METHODS: A complete search of the applicable literature was done. Included studies reported on patients from the same cohort who were surgically treated for GCTDR with WE or IC. Two reviewers independently assessed all papers. The primary outcome measure was LR. RESULTS: One-hundred-forty-one patients from six studies were included: 60 treated with WE, and 81 with IC. Five WE patients (8%) suffered LR whereas 25 IC patients (31%) did. The odds of LR were three times less in the WE group vs the IC group. MSTS1993 scores, where available, were on average 'good' with WE and 'excellent' with IC. CONCLUSIONS: Within statistical limitations the data support an attempt, where feasible, at wrist joint preservation and superior function with IC. Intralesional curettage is reasonable when the functional benefit outweighs the risk of recurrence as is the case in many cases of GCT of the distal radius. Bentham Open 2013-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3664443/ /pubmed/23730371 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010103 Text en © Pazionis et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Pazionis, Theresa J.C Alradwan, Hussain Deheshi, Benjamin M Turcotte, Robert Farrokhyar, Forough Ghert, Michelle A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius |
title | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius |
title_full | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius |
title_short | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of en-bloc vs intralesional resection for giant cell tumor of bone of the distal radius |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23730371 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pazionistheresajc asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius AT alradwanhussain asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius AT deheshibenjaminm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius AT turcotterobert asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius AT farrokhyarforough asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius AT ghertmichelle asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius AT pazionistheresajc systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius AT alradwanhussain systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius AT deheshibenjaminm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius AT turcotterobert systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius AT farrokhyarforough systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius AT ghertmichelle systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius |