Cargando…

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius

INTRODUCTION: Surgical management of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the distal radius (GCTDR) remains controversial due to risk of local recurrence (LR) offset by functional limitations which result from en-bloc resection. This study aims to determine the oncologic and functional outcomes of wide excis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pazionis, Theresa J.C, Alradwan, Hussain, Deheshi, Benjamin M, Turcotte, Robert, Farrokhyar, Forough, Ghert, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23730371
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010103
_version_ 1782271102003707904
author Pazionis, Theresa J.C
Alradwan, Hussain
Deheshi, Benjamin M
Turcotte, Robert
Farrokhyar, Forough
Ghert, Michelle
author_facet Pazionis, Theresa J.C
Alradwan, Hussain
Deheshi, Benjamin M
Turcotte, Robert
Farrokhyar, Forough
Ghert, Michelle
author_sort Pazionis, Theresa J.C
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Surgical management of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the distal radius (GCTDR) remains controversial due to risk of local recurrence (LR) offset by functional limitations which result from en-bloc resection. This study aims to determine the oncologic and functional outcomes of wide excision (WE) vs intralesional curettage (IC) of GCTDR. METHODS: A complete search of the applicable literature was done. Included studies reported on patients from the same cohort who were surgically treated for GCTDR with WE or IC. Two reviewers independently assessed all papers. The primary outcome measure was LR. RESULTS: One-hundred-forty-one patients from six studies were included: 60 treated with WE, and 81 with IC. Five WE patients (8%) suffered LR whereas 25 IC patients (31%) did. The odds of LR were three times less in the WE group vs the IC group. MSTS1993 scores, where available, were on average 'good' with WE and 'excellent' with IC. CONCLUSIONS: Within statistical limitations the data support an attempt, where feasible, at wrist joint preservation and superior function with IC. Intralesional curettage is reasonable when the functional benefit outweighs the risk of recurrence as is the case in many cases of GCT of the distal radius.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3664443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36644432013-05-31 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius Pazionis, Theresa J.C Alradwan, Hussain Deheshi, Benjamin M Turcotte, Robert Farrokhyar, Forough Ghert, Michelle Open Orthop J Article INTRODUCTION: Surgical management of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the distal radius (GCTDR) remains controversial due to risk of local recurrence (LR) offset by functional limitations which result from en-bloc resection. This study aims to determine the oncologic and functional outcomes of wide excision (WE) vs intralesional curettage (IC) of GCTDR. METHODS: A complete search of the applicable literature was done. Included studies reported on patients from the same cohort who were surgically treated for GCTDR with WE or IC. Two reviewers independently assessed all papers. The primary outcome measure was LR. RESULTS: One-hundred-forty-one patients from six studies were included: 60 treated with WE, and 81 with IC. Five WE patients (8%) suffered LR whereas 25 IC patients (31%) did. The odds of LR were three times less in the WE group vs the IC group. MSTS1993 scores, where available, were on average 'good' with WE and 'excellent' with IC. CONCLUSIONS: Within statistical limitations the data support an attempt, where feasible, at wrist joint preservation and superior function with IC. Intralesional curettage is reasonable when the functional benefit outweighs the risk of recurrence as is the case in many cases of GCT of the distal radius. Bentham Open 2013-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3664443/ /pubmed/23730371 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010103 Text en © Pazionis et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Pazionis, Theresa J.C
Alradwan, Hussain
Deheshi, Benjamin M
Turcotte, Robert
Farrokhyar, Forough
Ghert, Michelle
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius
title A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius
title_full A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius
title_fullStr A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius
title_short A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of En-Bloc vs Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the Distal Radius
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of en-bloc vs intralesional resection for giant cell tumor of bone of the distal radius
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23730371
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010103
work_keys_str_mv AT pazionistheresajc asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius
AT alradwanhussain asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius
AT deheshibenjaminm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius
AT turcotterobert asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius
AT farrokhyarforough asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius
AT ghertmichelle asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius
AT pazionistheresajc systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius
AT alradwanhussain systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius
AT deheshibenjaminm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius
AT turcotterobert systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius
AT farrokhyarforough systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius
AT ghertmichelle systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofenblocvsintralesionalresectionforgiantcelltumorofboneofthedistalradius