Cargando…

Imaging of the appearance time of cerebral blood using [(15)O]H(2)O PET for the computation of correct CBF

BACKGROUND: Quantification of cerebral blood flow (CBF) is important for the understanding of normal and pathologic brain physiology. Positron emission tomography (PET) with H(2)(15)O (or C(15)O(2)) can quantify CBF and apply kinetic analyses, including autoradiography (ARG) and the basis function m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kudomi, Nobuyuki, Maeda, Yukito, Sasakawa, Yasuhiro, Monden, Toshihide, Yamamoto, Yuka, Kawai, Nobuyuki, Iida, Hidehiro, Nishiyama, Yoshihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23701960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-41
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Quantification of cerebral blood flow (CBF) is important for the understanding of normal and pathologic brain physiology. Positron emission tomography (PET) with H(2)(15)O (or C(15)O(2)) can quantify CBF and apply kinetic analyses, including autoradiography (ARG) and the basis function methods (BFM). These approaches, however, are sensitive to input function errors such as the appearance time of cerebral blood (ATB), known as the delay time. We estimated brain ATB in an image-based fashion to correct CBF by accounting for differences in computed CBF values using three different analyses: ARG and BFM with and without fixing the partition coefficient. METHODS: Subject groups included those with no significant disorders, those with elevated cerebral blood volume, and those with reduced CBF. All subjects underwent PET examination, and CBF was estimated using the three analyses. The ATB was then computed from the differences of the obtained CBF values, and ATB-corrected CBF values were computed. ATB was also estimated for regions of interest (ROIs) of multiple cortical regions. The feasibility of the present method was tested in a simulation study. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the obtained ATB between the image- and ROI-based methods. Significantly later appearance was found in the cerebellum compared to other brain regions for all groups. In cortical regions where CBF was reduced due to occlusive lesions, the ATB was 0.2 ± 1.2 s, which was significantly delayed relative to the contralateral regions. A simulation study showed that the ATB-corrected CBF was less sensitive to errors in input function, and noise on the tissue curve did not enhance the degree of noise on ATB-corrected CBF image. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential utility of visualizing the ATB in the brain, enabling the determination of CBF with less sensitivity to error in input function.