Cargando…

Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets

The discovery of ultrasonic bat echolocation prompted a wide search for other animal biosonar systems, which yielded, among few others, two avian groups. One, the South American Oilbird (Steatornis caripensis: Caprimulgiformes), is nocturnal and eats fruit. The other is a selection of diurnal, insec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brinkløv, Signe, Fenton, M. Brock, Ratcliffe, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23755019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00123
_version_ 1782271157763833856
author Brinkløv, Signe
Fenton, M. Brock
Ratcliffe, John M.
author_facet Brinkløv, Signe
Fenton, M. Brock
Ratcliffe, John M.
author_sort Brinkløv, Signe
collection PubMed
description The discovery of ultrasonic bat echolocation prompted a wide search for other animal biosonar systems, which yielded, among few others, two avian groups. One, the South American Oilbird (Steatornis caripensis: Caprimulgiformes), is nocturnal and eats fruit. The other is a selection of diurnal, insect-eating swiftlets (species in the genera Aerodramus and Collocalia: Apodidae) from across the Indo-Pacific. Bird echolocation is restricted to lower frequencies audible to humans, implying a system of poorer resolution than the ultrasonic (>20 kHz) biosonar of most bats and toothed whales. As such, bird echolocation has been labeled crude or rudimentary. Yet, echolocation is found in at least 16 extant bird species and has evolved several times in avian lineages. Birds use their syringes to produce broadband click-type biosonar signals that allow them to nest in dark caves and tunnels, probably with less predation pressure. There are ongoing discrepancies about several details of bird echolocation, from signal design to the question about whether echolocation is used during foraging. It remains to be seen if bird echolocation is as sophisticated as that of tongue-clicking rousette bats. Bird echolocation performance appears to be superior to that of blind humans using signals of notable similarity. However, no apparent specializations have been found so far in the birds' auditory system (from middle ear to higher processing centers). The advent of light-weight recording equipment and custom software for examining signals and reconstructing flight paths now provides the potential to study the echolocation behavior of birds in more detail and resolve such issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3664765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36647652013-06-10 Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets Brinkløv, Signe Fenton, M. Brock Ratcliffe, John M. Front Physiol Physiology The discovery of ultrasonic bat echolocation prompted a wide search for other animal biosonar systems, which yielded, among few others, two avian groups. One, the South American Oilbird (Steatornis caripensis: Caprimulgiformes), is nocturnal and eats fruit. The other is a selection of diurnal, insect-eating swiftlets (species in the genera Aerodramus and Collocalia: Apodidae) from across the Indo-Pacific. Bird echolocation is restricted to lower frequencies audible to humans, implying a system of poorer resolution than the ultrasonic (>20 kHz) biosonar of most bats and toothed whales. As such, bird echolocation has been labeled crude or rudimentary. Yet, echolocation is found in at least 16 extant bird species and has evolved several times in avian lineages. Birds use their syringes to produce broadband click-type biosonar signals that allow them to nest in dark caves and tunnels, probably with less predation pressure. There are ongoing discrepancies about several details of bird echolocation, from signal design to the question about whether echolocation is used during foraging. It remains to be seen if bird echolocation is as sophisticated as that of tongue-clicking rousette bats. Bird echolocation performance appears to be superior to that of blind humans using signals of notable similarity. However, no apparent specializations have been found so far in the birds' auditory system (from middle ear to higher processing centers). The advent of light-weight recording equipment and custom software for examining signals and reconstructing flight paths now provides the potential to study the echolocation behavior of birds in more detail and resolve such issues. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3664765/ /pubmed/23755019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00123 Text en Copyright © 2013 Brinkløv, Fenton and Ratcliffe. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Physiology
Brinkløv, Signe
Fenton, M. Brock
Ratcliffe, John M.
Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets
title Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets
title_full Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets
title_fullStr Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets
title_full_unstemmed Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets
title_short Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets
title_sort echolocation in oilbirds and swiftlets
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23755019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00123
work_keys_str_mv AT brinkløvsigne echolocationinoilbirdsandswiftlets
AT fentonmbrock echolocationinoilbirdsandswiftlets
AT ratcliffejohnm echolocationinoilbirdsandswiftlets