Cargando…

Antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in South Tunisia

INTRODUCTION: Identifying newborns who weight 4000 g or more is important because birth of macrosomic fetuses is associated with adverse peripartum outcomes. Ultrasound is widely used for this purpose Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of sonographic measurement of fetal abdominal ci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaabane, Kais, Trigui, Khaled, Louati, Doulira, Kebaili, Sahbi, Gassara, Hichem, Dammak, Abdallah, Amouri, Habib, Guermazi, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The African Field Epidemiology Network 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23717725
http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2013.14.111.1979
_version_ 1782271176875180032
author Chaabane, Kais
Trigui, Khaled
Louati, Doulira
Kebaili, Sahbi
Gassara, Hichem
Dammak, Abdallah
Amouri, Habib
Guermazi, Mohamed
author_facet Chaabane, Kais
Trigui, Khaled
Louati, Doulira
Kebaili, Sahbi
Gassara, Hichem
Dammak, Abdallah
Amouri, Habib
Guermazi, Mohamed
author_sort Chaabane, Kais
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Identifying newborns who weight 4000 g or more is important because birth of macrosomic fetuses is associated with adverse peripartum outcomes. Ultrasound is widely used for this purpose Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of sonographic measurement of fetal abdominal circumference (AC) over 350 mm for the prediction of fetal macrosomia and shoulder dystocia, to specify factors that could generate errors in its measure. METHODS: A retrospective clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hédi Chaker Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia. The study consisted of comparing two groups of singleton newborns: the first group (n=465) includes macrosomic babies and the second group (n=465) includes the non macrosomic ones. All women underwent sonographic measurements of the fetal abdominal circumference (AC) within 72 hours before delivery. The AC values were correlated to actual fetal birth weight. The cut-off value of AC for predicting of fetal macrosomia was analyzed. RESULTS: A cut-off value of abdominal circumference ≥350 mm, in predicting of fetal macrosomia., had a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value: 78.7%, 76.8%, 77%, 92.6%, and 49.2%, respectively. In macrosomic group obesity was significantly more frequent when AC≥350mm. CONCLUSION: The fetal AC measurement was useful in predicting of fetal macrosomia. An AC measurement AC≥350mm could help to suspect shoulder dystocia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3664880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The African Field Epidemiology Network
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36648802013-05-28 Antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in South Tunisia Chaabane, Kais Trigui, Khaled Louati, Doulira Kebaili, Sahbi Gassara, Hichem Dammak, Abdallah Amouri, Habib Guermazi, Mohamed Pan Afr Med J Research INTRODUCTION: Identifying newborns who weight 4000 g or more is important because birth of macrosomic fetuses is associated with adverse peripartum outcomes. Ultrasound is widely used for this purpose Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of sonographic measurement of fetal abdominal circumference (AC) over 350 mm for the prediction of fetal macrosomia and shoulder dystocia, to specify factors that could generate errors in its measure. METHODS: A retrospective clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hédi Chaker Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia. The study consisted of comparing two groups of singleton newborns: the first group (n=465) includes macrosomic babies and the second group (n=465) includes the non macrosomic ones. All women underwent sonographic measurements of the fetal abdominal circumference (AC) within 72 hours before delivery. The AC values were correlated to actual fetal birth weight. The cut-off value of AC for predicting of fetal macrosomia was analyzed. RESULTS: A cut-off value of abdominal circumference ≥350 mm, in predicting of fetal macrosomia., had a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value: 78.7%, 76.8%, 77%, 92.6%, and 49.2%, respectively. In macrosomic group obesity was significantly more frequent when AC≥350mm. CONCLUSION: The fetal AC measurement was useful in predicting of fetal macrosomia. An AC measurement AC≥350mm could help to suspect shoulder dystocia. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2013-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3664880/ /pubmed/23717725 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2013.14.111.1979 Text en © Kais Chaabane et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Chaabane, Kais
Trigui, Khaled
Louati, Doulira
Kebaili, Sahbi
Gassara, Hichem
Dammak, Abdallah
Amouri, Habib
Guermazi, Mohamed
Antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in South Tunisia
title Antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in South Tunisia
title_full Antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in South Tunisia
title_fullStr Antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in South Tunisia
title_full_unstemmed Antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in South Tunisia
title_short Antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in South Tunisia
title_sort antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in south tunisia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23717725
http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2013.14.111.1979
work_keys_str_mv AT chaabanekais antenatalmacrosomiapredictionusingsonographicfetalabdominalcircumferenceinsouthtunisia
AT triguikhaled antenatalmacrosomiapredictionusingsonographicfetalabdominalcircumferenceinsouthtunisia
AT louatidoulira antenatalmacrosomiapredictionusingsonographicfetalabdominalcircumferenceinsouthtunisia
AT kebailisahbi antenatalmacrosomiapredictionusingsonographicfetalabdominalcircumferenceinsouthtunisia
AT gassarahichem antenatalmacrosomiapredictionusingsonographicfetalabdominalcircumferenceinsouthtunisia
AT dammakabdallah antenatalmacrosomiapredictionusingsonographicfetalabdominalcircumferenceinsouthtunisia
AT amourihabib antenatalmacrosomiapredictionusingsonographicfetalabdominalcircumferenceinsouthtunisia
AT guermazimohamed antenatalmacrosomiapredictionusingsonographicfetalabdominalcircumferenceinsouthtunisia