Cargando…
A critical review on two types of Laghupanchamula
A group of five roots of small plants i.e., Shalaparni, Prshniparni, Brhati, Kantakari and Gokshura or Eranda is known as Laghupanchamula under Mishraka Varga (group of drugs). It is used as such or with Mahat Panchamula i.e., Bilva, Gambhari, Shyonaka, Agnimantha and Patala, constituting Dashamula,...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3665092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23723639 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8520.108820 |
_version_ | 1782271205806440448 |
---|---|
author | Ghildiyal, Shivani Joshi, Vinod Kumar |
author_facet | Ghildiyal, Shivani Joshi, Vinod Kumar |
author_sort | Ghildiyal, Shivani |
collection | PubMed |
description | A group of five roots of small plants i.e., Shalaparni, Prshniparni, Brhati, Kantakari and Gokshura or Eranda is known as Laghupanchamula under Mishraka Varga (group of drugs). It is used as such or with Mahat Panchamula i.e., Bilva, Gambhari, Shyonaka, Agnimantha and Patala, constituting Dashamula, a well recognized and popular Ayurvedic preparation or as an ingredient of different dosage forms. Classical texts of Ayurveda differs regarding components of this Mishraka Varga. Four out of five drugs of Laghupanchamula are similar in all the Ayurvedic texts, but either Gokshura or Eranda is considered as the fifth drug. So a comphrenesive review of Veda, Samhita Grantha, Cikitsa Grantha and Nighantus, with regards to synonyms, contents, Guna- Karma, origin of variation in contents and possible thought behind two kinds of Laghupanchamula, to throw light for rational use of either Eranda or Gokshura under Laghupanchamula was conducted. It was observed that both the traditions were in practice however Acharya Kashyapa and Ravigupta were in view of Eranda as a fifth drug of Laghupanchamula where as Acharya Charaka, Sushruta, Vagabhatta, Yogaratnakara and Chakradatta are in favour of Gokshura. Infact, the variation in content depends on the need i.e Dosha, Dushya and Vyadhi. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3665092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36650922013-05-30 A critical review on two types of Laghupanchamula Ghildiyal, Shivani Joshi, Vinod Kumar Ayu Review Article A group of five roots of small plants i.e., Shalaparni, Prshniparni, Brhati, Kantakari and Gokshura or Eranda is known as Laghupanchamula under Mishraka Varga (group of drugs). It is used as such or with Mahat Panchamula i.e., Bilva, Gambhari, Shyonaka, Agnimantha and Patala, constituting Dashamula, a well recognized and popular Ayurvedic preparation or as an ingredient of different dosage forms. Classical texts of Ayurveda differs regarding components of this Mishraka Varga. Four out of five drugs of Laghupanchamula are similar in all the Ayurvedic texts, but either Gokshura or Eranda is considered as the fifth drug. So a comphrenesive review of Veda, Samhita Grantha, Cikitsa Grantha and Nighantus, with regards to synonyms, contents, Guna- Karma, origin of variation in contents and possible thought behind two kinds of Laghupanchamula, to throw light for rational use of either Eranda or Gokshura under Laghupanchamula was conducted. It was observed that both the traditions were in practice however Acharya Kashyapa and Ravigupta were in view of Eranda as a fifth drug of Laghupanchamula where as Acharya Charaka, Sushruta, Vagabhatta, Yogaratnakara and Chakradatta are in favour of Gokshura. Infact, the variation in content depends on the need i.e Dosha, Dushya and Vyadhi. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3665092/ /pubmed/23723639 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8520.108820 Text en Copyright: © AYU (An International Quarterly Journal of Research in Ayurveda) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ghildiyal, Shivani Joshi, Vinod Kumar A critical review on two types of Laghupanchamula |
title | A critical review on two types of Laghupanchamula |
title_full | A critical review on two types of Laghupanchamula |
title_fullStr | A critical review on two types of Laghupanchamula |
title_full_unstemmed | A critical review on two types of Laghupanchamula |
title_short | A critical review on two types of Laghupanchamula |
title_sort | critical review on two types of laghupanchamula |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3665092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23723639 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8520.108820 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghildiyalshivani acriticalreviewontwotypesoflaghupanchamula AT joshivinodkumar acriticalreviewontwotypesoflaghupanchamula AT ghildiyalshivani criticalreviewontwotypesoflaghupanchamula AT joshivinodkumar criticalreviewontwotypesoflaghupanchamula |