Cargando…

A recommended method in order to interpret chest x-rays for diagnosing small size pneumothorax

BACKGROUND: Pneumothorax can be a both progressive and life threatening disorder. In this survey we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a recommended method for the interpretation of chest X-Rays (CXRs) compared to the common method in diagnosis of iatrogenic Pneumothorax in an emergency department...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghane, Mohammad-Reza, Saburi, Amin, Javadzadeh, Hamid-Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3665117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23724383
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.109417
_version_ 1782271210837508096
author Ghane, Mohammad-Reza
Saburi, Amin
Javadzadeh, Hamid-Reza
author_facet Ghane, Mohammad-Reza
Saburi, Amin
Javadzadeh, Hamid-Reza
author_sort Ghane, Mohammad-Reza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pneumothorax can be a both progressive and life threatening disorder. In this survey we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a recommended method for the interpretation of chest X-Rays (CXRs) compared to the common method in diagnosis of iatrogenic Pneumothorax in an emergency department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a study on 100 CXRs (31 with the diagnosis of small size pneumothorax and 69 normal) of patients who have undergone the upper central venous catheterization. CXRs were interpreted by 5 Emergency Specialists (ESs) and 5 general practitioners (GPs) separately using the conventional and recommended method. Recommended method included a 90 degree rotation against the side of chateterization in addition to using a yellow shield as the background color. Presence of pneumothorax on the CXR was confirmed by a radiologist. RESULTS: 64.5% of the CXRs with pneumothorax were correctly diagnosed by GPs and 87.7% by ESs with reutine method and 83.2% and 97.4% by recommended method, respectively (P.value<0.001). 96.8% out of all CXRs were correctly diagnosed by GPs and 99.4% by ESs by conventional method and 97.9% by GP and 99.7% by ES was correctly diagnosed using recommended method(P.value<0.001). None of the underlying variables including sex, age, underlying diseases, the side of intervention did not affect on the diagnostic accuracy in either groups (P.value>0.05). CONCLUSION: A significant raise was obtained in the diagnostic accuracy of CXR using the recommended method. This study can be a preliminary study to conduct further investigations in order to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of CXRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3665117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36651172013-05-30 A recommended method in order to interpret chest x-rays for diagnosing small size pneumothorax Ghane, Mohammad-Reza Saburi, Amin Javadzadeh, Hamid-Reza Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Pneumothorax can be a both progressive and life threatening disorder. In this survey we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a recommended method for the interpretation of chest X-Rays (CXRs) compared to the common method in diagnosis of iatrogenic Pneumothorax in an emergency department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a study on 100 CXRs (31 with the diagnosis of small size pneumothorax and 69 normal) of patients who have undergone the upper central venous catheterization. CXRs were interpreted by 5 Emergency Specialists (ESs) and 5 general practitioners (GPs) separately using the conventional and recommended method. Recommended method included a 90 degree rotation against the side of chateterization in addition to using a yellow shield as the background color. Presence of pneumothorax on the CXR was confirmed by a radiologist. RESULTS: 64.5% of the CXRs with pneumothorax were correctly diagnosed by GPs and 87.7% by ESs with reutine method and 83.2% and 97.4% by recommended method, respectively (P.value<0.001). 96.8% out of all CXRs were correctly diagnosed by GPs and 99.4% by ESs by conventional method and 97.9% by GP and 99.7% by ES was correctly diagnosed using recommended method(P.value<0.001). None of the underlying variables including sex, age, underlying diseases, the side of intervention did not affect on the diagnostic accuracy in either groups (P.value>0.05). CONCLUSION: A significant raise was obtained in the diagnostic accuracy of CXR using the recommended method. This study can be a preliminary study to conduct further investigations in order to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of CXRs. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3665117/ /pubmed/23724383 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.109417 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghane, Mohammad-Reza
Saburi, Amin
Javadzadeh, Hamid-Reza
A recommended method in order to interpret chest x-rays for diagnosing small size pneumothorax
title A recommended method in order to interpret chest x-rays for diagnosing small size pneumothorax
title_full A recommended method in order to interpret chest x-rays for diagnosing small size pneumothorax
title_fullStr A recommended method in order to interpret chest x-rays for diagnosing small size pneumothorax
title_full_unstemmed A recommended method in order to interpret chest x-rays for diagnosing small size pneumothorax
title_short A recommended method in order to interpret chest x-rays for diagnosing small size pneumothorax
title_sort recommended method in order to interpret chest x-rays for diagnosing small size pneumothorax
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3665117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23724383
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.109417
work_keys_str_mv AT ghanemohammadreza arecommendedmethodinordertointerpretchestxraysfordiagnosingsmallsizepneumothorax
AT saburiamin arecommendedmethodinordertointerpretchestxraysfordiagnosingsmallsizepneumothorax
AT javadzadehhamidreza arecommendedmethodinordertointerpretchestxraysfordiagnosingsmallsizepneumothorax
AT ghanemohammadreza recommendedmethodinordertointerpretchestxraysfordiagnosingsmallsizepneumothorax
AT saburiamin recommendedmethodinordertointerpretchestxraysfordiagnosingsmallsizepneumothorax
AT javadzadehhamidreza recommendedmethodinordertointerpretchestxraysfordiagnosingsmallsizepneumothorax