Cargando…

Effect finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic

OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic when treated with different finishing/polishing protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixteen specimens of IPS Empress 2 ceramic were made from wax patterns obtained using a stainless steel split mold. The specimens were glazed (Stage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boaventura, Juliana Maria Capelozza, Nishida, Rodrigo, Elossais, André Afif, Lima, Darlon Martins, Reis, José Mauricio Santos Nunes, Campos, Edson Alves, de Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3665313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22724660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.690570
_version_ 1782271242497163264
author Boaventura, Juliana Maria Capelozza
Nishida, Rodrigo
Elossais, André Afif
Lima, Darlon Martins
Reis, José Mauricio Santos Nunes
Campos, Edson Alves
de Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi
author_facet Boaventura, Juliana Maria Capelozza
Nishida, Rodrigo
Elossais, André Afif
Lima, Darlon Martins
Reis, José Mauricio Santos Nunes
Campos, Edson Alves
de Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi
author_sort Boaventura, Juliana Maria Capelozza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic when treated with different finishing/polishing protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixteen specimens of IPS Empress 2 ceramic were made from wax patterns obtained using a stainless steel split mold. The specimens were glazed (Stage 0–S0, control) and divided into two groups. The specimens in Group 1 (G1) were finished/polished with a KG Sorensen diamond point (S1), followed by KG Sorensen siliconized points (S2) and final polishing with diamond polish paste (S3). In Group 2 (G2), the specimens were finished/polished using a Shofu diamond point (S1), as well as Shofu siliconized points (S2) and final polishing was performed using Porcelize paste (S3). After glazing (S0) and following each polishing procedure (S1, S2 or S3), the surface roughness was measured using TALYSURF Series 2. The average surface roughness results were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc tests (α = 0.01) RESULTS. All of the polishing procedures yielded higher surface roughness values when compared to the control group (S0). S3 yielded lower surface roughness values when compared to S1 and S2. CONCLUSIONS. The proposed treatments negatively affected the surface roughness of the glazed IPS Empress 2 ceramic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3665313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36653132013-06-05 Effect finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic Boaventura, Juliana Maria Capelozza Nishida, Rodrigo Elossais, André Afif Lima, Darlon Martins Reis, José Mauricio Santos Nunes Campos, Edson Alves de Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi Acta Odontol Scand Original Articles OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic when treated with different finishing/polishing protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixteen specimens of IPS Empress 2 ceramic were made from wax patterns obtained using a stainless steel split mold. The specimens were glazed (Stage 0–S0, control) and divided into two groups. The specimens in Group 1 (G1) were finished/polished with a KG Sorensen diamond point (S1), followed by KG Sorensen siliconized points (S2) and final polishing with diamond polish paste (S3). In Group 2 (G2), the specimens were finished/polished using a Shofu diamond point (S1), as well as Shofu siliconized points (S2) and final polishing was performed using Porcelize paste (S3). After glazing (S0) and following each polishing procedure (S1, S2 or S3), the surface roughness was measured using TALYSURF Series 2. The average surface roughness results were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc tests (α = 0.01) RESULTS. All of the polishing procedures yielded higher surface roughness values when compared to the control group (S0). S3 yielded lower surface roughness values when compared to S1 and S2. CONCLUSIONS. The proposed treatments negatively affected the surface roughness of the glazed IPS Empress 2 ceramic. Informa Healthcare 2013-05 2012-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3665313/ /pubmed/22724660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.690570 Text en © 2013 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Boaventura, Juliana Maria Capelozza
Nishida, Rodrigo
Elossais, André Afif
Lima, Darlon Martins
Reis, José Mauricio Santos Nunes
Campos, Edson Alves
de Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi
Effect finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic
title Effect finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic
title_full Effect finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic
title_fullStr Effect finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic
title_full_unstemmed Effect finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic
title_short Effect finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic
title_sort effect finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of ips empress 2 ceramic
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3665313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22724660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.690570
work_keys_str_mv AT boaventurajulianamariacapelozza effectfinishingandpolishingproceduresonthesurfaceroughnessofipsempress2ceramic
AT nishidarodrigo effectfinishingandpolishingproceduresonthesurfaceroughnessofipsempress2ceramic
AT elossaisandreafif effectfinishingandpolishingproceduresonthesurfaceroughnessofipsempress2ceramic
AT limadarlonmartins effectfinishingandpolishingproceduresonthesurfaceroughnessofipsempress2ceramic
AT reisjosemauriciosantosnunes effectfinishingandpolishingproceduresonthesurfaceroughnessofipsempress2ceramic
AT camposedsonalves effectfinishingandpolishingproceduresonthesurfaceroughnessofipsempress2ceramic
AT deandrademarceloferrarezi effectfinishingandpolishingproceduresonthesurfaceroughnessofipsempress2ceramic