Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia

BACKGROUND: This randomized double-blind study examined the use of a new anesthetic agent, levobupivacaine 0.5%, which is the S(−)-enantiomer of a racemic mixture of bupivacaine, for peribulbar anesthesia and compared it with racemic bupivacaine 0.5% alone or in combination with hyaluronidase 10 IU/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pacella, Elena, Pacella, Fernanda, Troisi, Fabiana, Dell’Edera, Domenico, Tuchetti, Paolo, Lenzi, Tommaso, Collini, Saul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3665566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23723684
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S43553
_version_ 1782271273127116800
author Pacella, Elena
Pacella, Fernanda
Troisi, Fabiana
Dell’Edera, Domenico
Tuchetti, Paolo
Lenzi, Tommaso
Collini, Saul
author_facet Pacella, Elena
Pacella, Fernanda
Troisi, Fabiana
Dell’Edera, Domenico
Tuchetti, Paolo
Lenzi, Tommaso
Collini, Saul
author_sort Pacella, Elena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This randomized double-blind study examined the use of a new anesthetic agent, levobupivacaine 0.5%, which is the S(−)-enantiomer of a racemic mixture of bupivacaine, for peribulbar anesthesia and compared it with racemic bupivacaine 0.5% alone or in combination with hyaluronidase 10 IU/mL. METHODS: A total of 160 patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery were randomized into four groups (n = 40 each) to receive inferotemporal peribulbar injection of levobupivacaine 0.5% (group L), racemic bupivacaine 0.5% (group B), levobupivacaine + hyaluronidase 10 IU/mL (group LH), or racemic bupivacaine + hyaluronidase 10 IU/mL (group BH) by two anesthetists and two ophthalmologists in a ratio of 25% each. Ocular akinesia and orbicularis oculi function were evaluated using a three-point scale; a value < 5 points was considered as requiring surgery, and movements were re-evaluated the day following surgery to confirm regression of the block. RESULTS: The time to onset (12 ± 2.6 minutes versus 13 ± 2.8 minutes) and duration of anesthesia (185 ± 33.2 minutes versus 188 ± 35.7 minutes) were similar between groups L and B. Complete akinesia (score 0) was obtained more frequently when hyaluronidase was used in addition to the anesthetic, with occurrences of 72.5% versus 57.5% in group LH versus L, respectively, and 67.5% versus 45% in group BH versus B. Moderate hypotension (<30% of baseline) was observed in four patients (10%) in group L, two (5.0%) in group B, one (2.5%) in group LH, and three (7.5%) in group BH. The time to onset was significantly different between groups L and BH, B and BH, and LH and BH, and the duration of anesthesia differed significantly between groups B and LH, B and BH, and L and LH. The akinesia score differed significantly between groups L and LH and between groups B and LH (P = 0.043 and P = 0.018, respectively), and the number of patients with a score of 0 differed significantly between groups B and LH and between groups B and BH (P = 0.004 and P = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSION: Levobupivacaine is a long-lasting local anesthetic with limited cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity, and may be considered the landmark for vitreoretinal surgery in elderly patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3665566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36655662013-05-30 Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia Pacella, Elena Pacella, Fernanda Troisi, Fabiana Dell’Edera, Domenico Tuchetti, Paolo Lenzi, Tommaso Collini, Saul Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: This randomized double-blind study examined the use of a new anesthetic agent, levobupivacaine 0.5%, which is the S(−)-enantiomer of a racemic mixture of bupivacaine, for peribulbar anesthesia and compared it with racemic bupivacaine 0.5% alone or in combination with hyaluronidase 10 IU/mL. METHODS: A total of 160 patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery were randomized into four groups (n = 40 each) to receive inferotemporal peribulbar injection of levobupivacaine 0.5% (group L), racemic bupivacaine 0.5% (group B), levobupivacaine + hyaluronidase 10 IU/mL (group LH), or racemic bupivacaine + hyaluronidase 10 IU/mL (group BH) by two anesthetists and two ophthalmologists in a ratio of 25% each. Ocular akinesia and orbicularis oculi function were evaluated using a three-point scale; a value < 5 points was considered as requiring surgery, and movements were re-evaluated the day following surgery to confirm regression of the block. RESULTS: The time to onset (12 ± 2.6 minutes versus 13 ± 2.8 minutes) and duration of anesthesia (185 ± 33.2 minutes versus 188 ± 35.7 minutes) were similar between groups L and B. Complete akinesia (score 0) was obtained more frequently when hyaluronidase was used in addition to the anesthetic, with occurrences of 72.5% versus 57.5% in group LH versus L, respectively, and 67.5% versus 45% in group BH versus B. Moderate hypotension (<30% of baseline) was observed in four patients (10%) in group L, two (5.0%) in group B, one (2.5%) in group LH, and three (7.5%) in group BH. The time to onset was significantly different between groups L and BH, B and BH, and LH and BH, and the duration of anesthesia differed significantly between groups B and LH, B and BH, and L and LH. The akinesia score differed significantly between groups L and LH and between groups B and LH (P = 0.043 and P = 0.018, respectively), and the number of patients with a score of 0 differed significantly between groups B and LH and between groups B and BH (P = 0.004 and P = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSION: Levobupivacaine is a long-lasting local anesthetic with limited cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity, and may be considered the landmark for vitreoretinal surgery in elderly patients. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3665566/ /pubmed/23723684 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S43553 Text en © 2013 Pacella et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pacella, Elena
Pacella, Fernanda
Troisi, Fabiana
Dell’Edera, Domenico
Tuchetti, Paolo
Lenzi, Tommaso
Collini, Saul
Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia
title Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia
title_full Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia
title_short Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia
title_sort efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3665566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23723684
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S43553
work_keys_str_mv AT pacellaelena efficacyandsafetyof05levobupivacaineversus05bupivacaineforperibulbaranesthesia
AT pacellafernanda efficacyandsafetyof05levobupivacaineversus05bupivacaineforperibulbaranesthesia
AT troisifabiana efficacyandsafetyof05levobupivacaineversus05bupivacaineforperibulbaranesthesia
AT dellederadomenico efficacyandsafetyof05levobupivacaineversus05bupivacaineforperibulbaranesthesia
AT tuchettipaolo efficacyandsafetyof05levobupivacaineversus05bupivacaineforperibulbaranesthesia
AT lenzitommaso efficacyandsafetyof05levobupivacaineversus05bupivacaineforperibulbaranesthesia
AT collinisaul efficacyandsafetyof05levobupivacaineversus05bupivacaineforperibulbaranesthesia