Cargando…

Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate enamel roughness after adhesive removal using different burs and an Er:YAG laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The buccal surfaces of forty human premolars were sealed by two layers of nail varnish, except for a circular area of 3 mm in diameter on the middle third....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahrari, Farzaneh, Akbari, Majid, Akbari, Javad, Dabiri, Ghahraman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3666068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23724206
_version_ 1782271343812673536
author Ahrari, Farzaneh
Akbari, Majid
Akbari, Javad
Dabiri, Ghahraman
author_facet Ahrari, Farzaneh
Akbari, Majid
Akbari, Javad
Dabiri, Ghahraman
author_sort Ahrari, Farzaneh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate enamel roughness after adhesive removal using different burs and an Er:YAG laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The buccal surfaces of forty human premolars were sealed by two layers of nail varnish, except for a circular area of 3 mm in diameter on the middle third. The enamel surfaces were initially subjected to profilometry analysis and four parameters of surface irregularity (Ra, Rq, Rt and Rz) were recorded. Following bracket bonding and debonding, adhesive remnants were removed by tungsten carbide burs in low- or high- speed handpieces (group 1 and 2, respectively), an ultrafine diamond bur (group 3) or an Er:YAG laser (250 mJ, long pulse, 4 Hz) (group 4), and surface roughness parameters were measured again. Then, the buccal surfaces were polished and the third profilometry measurements were performed. RESULTS: The specimens that were cleaned with a low speed tungsten carbide bur showed no significant difference in surface irregularity between the different treatment stages (p>0.05). Surface roughness increased significantly after clean-up with the diamond bur and the Er:YAG laser (p<0.01). In comparison between groups, adhesive removal with tungsten carbide burs at slow- or high-speed handpieces produced the lowest, while enamel clean-up with the Er:YAG laser caused the highest values of roughness measurements (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Under the study conditions, application of the ultrafine diamond bur or the Er:YAG laser caused irreversible enamel damage on tooth surface, and thus these methods could not be recommended for removing adhesive remnants after debonding of orthodontic brackets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3666068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36660682013-05-30 Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques Ahrari, Farzaneh Akbari, Majid Akbari, Javad Dabiri, Ghahraman J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate enamel roughness after adhesive removal using different burs and an Er:YAG laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The buccal surfaces of forty human premolars were sealed by two layers of nail varnish, except for a circular area of 3 mm in diameter on the middle third. The enamel surfaces were initially subjected to profilometry analysis and four parameters of surface irregularity (Ra, Rq, Rt and Rz) were recorded. Following bracket bonding and debonding, adhesive remnants were removed by tungsten carbide burs in low- or high- speed handpieces (group 1 and 2, respectively), an ultrafine diamond bur (group 3) or an Er:YAG laser (250 mJ, long pulse, 4 Hz) (group 4), and surface roughness parameters were measured again. Then, the buccal surfaces were polished and the third profilometry measurements were performed. RESULTS: The specimens that were cleaned with a low speed tungsten carbide bur showed no significant difference in surface irregularity between the different treatment stages (p>0.05). Surface roughness increased significantly after clean-up with the diamond bur and the Er:YAG laser (p<0.01). In comparison between groups, adhesive removal with tungsten carbide burs at slow- or high-speed handpieces produced the lowest, while enamel clean-up with the Er:YAG laser caused the highest values of roughness measurements (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Under the study conditions, application of the ultrafine diamond bur or the Er:YAG laser caused irreversible enamel damage on tooth surface, and thus these methods could not be recommended for removing adhesive remnants after debonding of orthodontic brackets. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2013-01-31 2013-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3666068/ /pubmed/23724206 Text en Copyright © Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahrari, Farzaneh
Akbari, Majid
Akbari, Javad
Dabiri, Ghahraman
Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
title Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
title_full Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
title_fullStr Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
title_short Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
title_sort enamel surface roughness after debonding of orthodontic brackets and various clean-up techniques
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3666068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23724206
work_keys_str_mv AT ahrarifarzaneh enamelsurfaceroughnessafterdebondingoforthodonticbracketsandvariouscleanuptechniques
AT akbarimajid enamelsurfaceroughnessafterdebondingoforthodonticbracketsandvariouscleanuptechniques
AT akbarijavad enamelsurfaceroughnessafterdebondingoforthodonticbracketsandvariouscleanuptechniques
AT dabirighahraman enamelsurfaceroughnessafterdebondingoforthodonticbracketsandvariouscleanuptechniques