Cargando…

Pharmacology of Antihistamines

This article reviews the molecular biology of the interaction of histamine with its H(1)-receptor and describes the concept that H(1)-antihistamines are not receptor antagonists but are inverse agonists i.e. they produce the opposite effect on the receptor to histamine. It then discourages the use o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Church, Diana S, Church, Martin K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Allergy Organization 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3666185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23282332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/1939-4551-4-S3-S22
_version_ 1782271356448014336
author Church, Diana S
Church, Martin K
author_facet Church, Diana S
Church, Martin K
author_sort Church, Diana S
collection PubMed
description This article reviews the molecular biology of the interaction of histamine with its H(1)-receptor and describes the concept that H(1)-antihistamines are not receptor antagonists but are inverse agonists i.e. they produce the opposite effect on the receptor to histamine. It then discourages the use of first-generation H(1)-antihistamines in clinical practice today for two main reasons. First, they are less effective than second generation H(1)-antihistamines. Second, they have unwanted side effects, particularly central nervous system and anti-cholinergic effects, and have the potential for causing severe toxic reactions which are not shared by second-generation H(1)-antihistamines. There are many efficacious and safe second-generation H(1)-antihistamines on the market for the treatment of allergic disease. Of the three drugs highlighted in this review, levocetirizine and fexofenadine are the most efficacious in humans in vivo. However, levocetirizine may cause somnolence in susceptible individuals while fexofenadine has a relatively short duration of action requiring twice daily administration for full all round daily protection. While desloratadine is less efficacious, it has the advantages of rarely causing somnolence and having a long duration of action. Lastly, all H(1)-antihistamines have anti-inflammatory effects but it requires regular daily dosing rather than dosing 'on-demand' for this effect to be clinically demonstrable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3666185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher World Allergy Organization
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36661852013-07-19 Pharmacology of Antihistamines Church, Diana S Church, Martin K World Allergy Organ J Symposium Report Supplement This article reviews the molecular biology of the interaction of histamine with its H(1)-receptor and describes the concept that H(1)-antihistamines are not receptor antagonists but are inverse agonists i.e. they produce the opposite effect on the receptor to histamine. It then discourages the use of first-generation H(1)-antihistamines in clinical practice today for two main reasons. First, they are less effective than second generation H(1)-antihistamines. Second, they have unwanted side effects, particularly central nervous system and anti-cholinergic effects, and have the potential for causing severe toxic reactions which are not shared by second-generation H(1)-antihistamines. There are many efficacious and safe second-generation H(1)-antihistamines on the market for the treatment of allergic disease. Of the three drugs highlighted in this review, levocetirizine and fexofenadine are the most efficacious in humans in vivo. However, levocetirizine may cause somnolence in susceptible individuals while fexofenadine has a relatively short duration of action requiring twice daily administration for full all round daily protection. While desloratadine is less efficacious, it has the advantages of rarely causing somnolence and having a long duration of action. Lastly, all H(1)-antihistamines have anti-inflammatory effects but it requires regular daily dosing rather than dosing 'on-demand' for this effect to be clinically demonstrable. World Allergy Organization 2011-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3666185/ /pubmed/23282332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/1939-4551-4-S3-S22 Text en Copyright ©2011 World Allergy Organization; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Symposium Report Supplement
Church, Diana S
Church, Martin K
Pharmacology of Antihistamines
title Pharmacology of Antihistamines
title_full Pharmacology of Antihistamines
title_fullStr Pharmacology of Antihistamines
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacology of Antihistamines
title_short Pharmacology of Antihistamines
title_sort pharmacology of antihistamines
topic Symposium Report Supplement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3666185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23282332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/1939-4551-4-S3-S22
work_keys_str_mv AT churchdianas pharmacologyofantihistamines
AT churchmartink pharmacologyofantihistamines