Cargando…

Challenges in the Management of Chronic Urticaria

The term "chronic idiopathic urticaria" denotes a spectrum of conditions with different poorly understood pathogenetic mechanisms in which the release of histamine plays a role. Nonsedating second-generation H(1 )antihistamines are postulated to be the first line of treatment of chronic id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Popov, Todor A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Allergy Organization 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3666186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23282333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/1939-4551-4-S3-S28
_version_ 1782271356678701056
author Popov, Todor A
author_facet Popov, Todor A
author_sort Popov, Todor A
collection PubMed
description The term "chronic idiopathic urticaria" denotes a spectrum of conditions with different poorly understood pathogenetic mechanisms in which the release of histamine plays a role. Nonsedating second-generation H(1 )antihistamines are postulated to be the first line of treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria by national and international guidelines, but as control is not always achievable with the usually recommended doses, first-generation sedating antihistamines like hydroxyzine and diphenhydramine at high daily doses (200 mg) have been proposed as an alternative before resorting to treatment with systemic corticosteroids and other potentially hazardous agents. Our long time experience and recent research give us grounds to believe that increasing the doses of nonsedating H(1 )antihistamines up to fourfold improves significantly the chances of successful treatment. Our data suggest that the urticaria-associated discomfort is relieved by higher than conventional doses of levoce-tirizine and desloratadine in about 75% of the patients and that sedation/somnolence does not seem to be a major deterrent. The dose increase also improves the urticaria-specific quality of life. Contrary to the belief that individual patients may benefit from one antihistamine or another, we demonstrate that the drug with better ability to suppress the histamine skin effects in experiments in healthy volunteers (levocetirizine) is also superior in improving the different aspects of control of chronic urticaria (subjective and objective symptoms, quality of life) and that increasing its dose of up to fourfold may even paradoxically reduce the sense of sedation/somnolence in parallel with the relief of urticaria discomfort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3666186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher World Allergy Organization
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36661862013-07-12 Challenges in the Management of Chronic Urticaria Popov, Todor A World Allergy Organ J Symposium Report Supplement The term "chronic idiopathic urticaria" denotes a spectrum of conditions with different poorly understood pathogenetic mechanisms in which the release of histamine plays a role. Nonsedating second-generation H(1 )antihistamines are postulated to be the first line of treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria by national and international guidelines, but as control is not always achievable with the usually recommended doses, first-generation sedating antihistamines like hydroxyzine and diphenhydramine at high daily doses (200 mg) have been proposed as an alternative before resorting to treatment with systemic corticosteroids and other potentially hazardous agents. Our long time experience and recent research give us grounds to believe that increasing the doses of nonsedating H(1 )antihistamines up to fourfold improves significantly the chances of successful treatment. Our data suggest that the urticaria-associated discomfort is relieved by higher than conventional doses of levoce-tirizine and desloratadine in about 75% of the patients and that sedation/somnolence does not seem to be a major deterrent. The dose increase also improves the urticaria-specific quality of life. Contrary to the belief that individual patients may benefit from one antihistamine or another, we demonstrate that the drug with better ability to suppress the histamine skin effects in experiments in healthy volunteers (levocetirizine) is also superior in improving the different aspects of control of chronic urticaria (subjective and objective symptoms, quality of life) and that increasing its dose of up to fourfold may even paradoxically reduce the sense of sedation/somnolence in parallel with the relief of urticaria discomfort. World Allergy Organization 2011-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3666186/ /pubmed/23282333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/1939-4551-4-S3-S28 Text en Copyright ©2011 World Allergy Organization; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Symposium Report Supplement
Popov, Todor A
Challenges in the Management of Chronic Urticaria
title Challenges in the Management of Chronic Urticaria
title_full Challenges in the Management of Chronic Urticaria
title_fullStr Challenges in the Management of Chronic Urticaria
title_full_unstemmed Challenges in the Management of Chronic Urticaria
title_short Challenges in the Management of Chronic Urticaria
title_sort challenges in the management of chronic urticaria
topic Symposium Report Supplement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3666186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23282333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/1939-4551-4-S3-S28
work_keys_str_mv AT popovtodora challengesinthemanagementofchronicurticaria