Cargando…
Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework
BACKGROUND: Selective publication of studies, which is commonly called publication bias, is widely recognized. Over the years a new nomenclature for other types of bias related to non-publication or distortion related to the dissemination of research findings has been developed. However, several of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23692820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-34 |
_version_ | 1782271422899421184 |
---|---|
author | Müller, Katharina Felicitas Briel, Matthias D’Amario, Alexandra Kleijnen, Jos Marusic, Ana Wager, Elizabeth Antes, Gerd von Elm, Erik Lang, Britta Motschall, Edith Gloy, Viktoria Schwarzer, Guido Altman, Doug Meerpohl, Joerg J Bassler, Dirk |
author_facet | Müller, Katharina Felicitas Briel, Matthias D’Amario, Alexandra Kleijnen, Jos Marusic, Ana Wager, Elizabeth Antes, Gerd von Elm, Erik Lang, Britta Motschall, Edith Gloy, Viktoria Schwarzer, Guido Altman, Doug Meerpohl, Joerg J Bassler, Dirk |
author_sort | Müller, Katharina Felicitas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Selective publication of studies, which is commonly called publication bias, is widely recognized. Over the years a new nomenclature for other types of bias related to non-publication or distortion related to the dissemination of research findings has been developed. However, several of these different biases are often still summarized by the term 'publication bias'. METHODS/DESIGN: As part of the OPEN Project (To Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) we will conduct a systematic review with the following objectives: - To systematically review highly cited articles that focus on non-publication of studies and to present the various definitions of biases related to the dissemination of research findings contained in the articles identified. - To develop and discuss a new framework on nomenclature of various aspects of distortion in the dissemination process that leads to public availability of research findings in an international group of experts in the context of the OPEN Project. We will systematically search Web of Knowledge for highly cited articles that provide a definition of biases related to the dissemination of research findings. A specifically designed data extraction form will be developed and pilot-tested. Working in teams of two, we will independently extract relevant information from each eligible article. For the development of a new framework we will construct an initial table listing different levels and different hazards en route to making research findings public. An international group of experts will iteratively review the table and reflect on its content until no new insights emerge and consensus has been reached. DISCUSSION: Results are expected to be publicly available in mid-2013. This systematic review together with the results of other systematic reviews of the OPEN project will serve as a basis for the development of future policies and guidelines regarding the assessment and prevention of publication bias. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3667005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36670052013-05-30 Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework Müller, Katharina Felicitas Briel, Matthias D’Amario, Alexandra Kleijnen, Jos Marusic, Ana Wager, Elizabeth Antes, Gerd von Elm, Erik Lang, Britta Motschall, Edith Gloy, Viktoria Schwarzer, Guido Altman, Doug Meerpohl, Joerg J Bassler, Dirk Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Selective publication of studies, which is commonly called publication bias, is widely recognized. Over the years a new nomenclature for other types of bias related to non-publication or distortion related to the dissemination of research findings has been developed. However, several of these different biases are often still summarized by the term 'publication bias'. METHODS/DESIGN: As part of the OPEN Project (To Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) we will conduct a systematic review with the following objectives: - To systematically review highly cited articles that focus on non-publication of studies and to present the various definitions of biases related to the dissemination of research findings contained in the articles identified. - To develop and discuss a new framework on nomenclature of various aspects of distortion in the dissemination process that leads to public availability of research findings in an international group of experts in the context of the OPEN Project. We will systematically search Web of Knowledge for highly cited articles that provide a definition of biases related to the dissemination of research findings. A specifically designed data extraction form will be developed and pilot-tested. Working in teams of two, we will independently extract relevant information from each eligible article. For the development of a new framework we will construct an initial table listing different levels and different hazards en route to making research findings public. An international group of experts will iteratively review the table and reflect on its content until no new insights emerge and consensus has been reached. DISCUSSION: Results are expected to be publicly available in mid-2013. This systematic review together with the results of other systematic reviews of the OPEN project will serve as a basis for the development of future policies and guidelines regarding the assessment and prevention of publication bias. BioMed Central 2013-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3667005/ /pubmed/23692820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-34 Text en Copyright © 2013 Müller et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Müller, Katharina Felicitas Briel, Matthias D’Amario, Alexandra Kleijnen, Jos Marusic, Ana Wager, Elizabeth Antes, Gerd von Elm, Erik Lang, Britta Motschall, Edith Gloy, Viktoria Schwarzer, Guido Altman, Doug Meerpohl, Joerg J Bassler, Dirk Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework |
title | Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework |
title_full | Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework |
title_fullStr | Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework |
title_short | Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework |
title_sort | defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23692820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-34 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullerkatharinafelicitas definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT brielmatthias definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT damarioalexandra definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT kleijnenjos definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT marusicana definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT wagerelizabeth definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT antesgerd definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT vonelmerik definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT langbritta definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT motschalledith definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT gloyviktoria definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT schwarzerguido definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT altmandoug definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT meerpohljoergj definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework AT basslerdirk definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework |