Cargando…

Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework

BACKGROUND: Selective publication of studies, which is commonly called publication bias, is widely recognized. Over the years a new nomenclature for other types of bias related to non-publication or distortion related to the dissemination of research findings has been developed. However, several of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Katharina Felicitas, Briel, Matthias, D’Amario, Alexandra, Kleijnen, Jos, Marusic, Ana, Wager, Elizabeth, Antes, Gerd, von Elm, Erik, Lang, Britta, Motschall, Edith, Gloy, Viktoria, Schwarzer, Guido, Altman, Doug, Meerpohl, Joerg J, Bassler, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23692820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-34
_version_ 1782271422899421184
author Müller, Katharina Felicitas
Briel, Matthias
D’Amario, Alexandra
Kleijnen, Jos
Marusic, Ana
Wager, Elizabeth
Antes, Gerd
von Elm, Erik
Lang, Britta
Motschall, Edith
Gloy, Viktoria
Schwarzer, Guido
Altman, Doug
Meerpohl, Joerg J
Bassler, Dirk
author_facet Müller, Katharina Felicitas
Briel, Matthias
D’Amario, Alexandra
Kleijnen, Jos
Marusic, Ana
Wager, Elizabeth
Antes, Gerd
von Elm, Erik
Lang, Britta
Motschall, Edith
Gloy, Viktoria
Schwarzer, Guido
Altman, Doug
Meerpohl, Joerg J
Bassler, Dirk
author_sort Müller, Katharina Felicitas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Selective publication of studies, which is commonly called publication bias, is widely recognized. Over the years a new nomenclature for other types of bias related to non-publication or distortion related to the dissemination of research findings has been developed. However, several of these different biases are often still summarized by the term 'publication bias'. METHODS/DESIGN: As part of the OPEN Project (To Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) we will conduct a systematic review with the following objectives: - To systematically review highly cited articles that focus on non-publication of studies and to present the various definitions of biases related to the dissemination of research findings contained in the articles identified. - To develop and discuss a new framework on nomenclature of various aspects of distortion in the dissemination process that leads to public availability of research findings in an international group of experts in the context of the OPEN Project. We will systematically search Web of Knowledge for highly cited articles that provide a definition of biases related to the dissemination of research findings. A specifically designed data extraction form will be developed and pilot-tested. Working in teams of two, we will independently extract relevant information from each eligible article. For the development of a new framework we will construct an initial table listing different levels and different hazards en route to making research findings public. An international group of experts will iteratively review the table and reflect on its content until no new insights emerge and consensus has been reached. DISCUSSION: Results are expected to be publicly available in mid-2013. This systematic review together with the results of other systematic reviews of the OPEN project will serve as a basis for the development of future policies and guidelines regarding the assessment and prevention of publication bias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36670052013-05-30 Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework Müller, Katharina Felicitas Briel, Matthias D’Amario, Alexandra Kleijnen, Jos Marusic, Ana Wager, Elizabeth Antes, Gerd von Elm, Erik Lang, Britta Motschall, Edith Gloy, Viktoria Schwarzer, Guido Altman, Doug Meerpohl, Joerg J Bassler, Dirk Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Selective publication of studies, which is commonly called publication bias, is widely recognized. Over the years a new nomenclature for other types of bias related to non-publication or distortion related to the dissemination of research findings has been developed. However, several of these different biases are often still summarized by the term 'publication bias'. METHODS/DESIGN: As part of the OPEN Project (To Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) we will conduct a systematic review with the following objectives: - To systematically review highly cited articles that focus on non-publication of studies and to present the various definitions of biases related to the dissemination of research findings contained in the articles identified. - To develop and discuss a new framework on nomenclature of various aspects of distortion in the dissemination process that leads to public availability of research findings in an international group of experts in the context of the OPEN Project. We will systematically search Web of Knowledge for highly cited articles that provide a definition of biases related to the dissemination of research findings. A specifically designed data extraction form will be developed and pilot-tested. Working in teams of two, we will independently extract relevant information from each eligible article. For the development of a new framework we will construct an initial table listing different levels and different hazards en route to making research findings public. An international group of experts will iteratively review the table and reflect on its content until no new insights emerge and consensus has been reached. DISCUSSION: Results are expected to be publicly available in mid-2013. This systematic review together with the results of other systematic reviews of the OPEN project will serve as a basis for the development of future policies and guidelines regarding the assessment and prevention of publication bias. BioMed Central 2013-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3667005/ /pubmed/23692820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-34 Text en Copyright © 2013 Müller et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Protocol
Müller, Katharina Felicitas
Briel, Matthias
D’Amario, Alexandra
Kleijnen, Jos
Marusic, Ana
Wager, Elizabeth
Antes, Gerd
von Elm, Erik
Lang, Britta
Motschall, Edith
Gloy, Viktoria
Schwarzer, Guido
Altman, Doug
Meerpohl, Joerg J
Bassler, Dirk
Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework
title Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework
title_full Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework
title_fullStr Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework
title_full_unstemmed Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework
title_short Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework
title_sort defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23692820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-34
work_keys_str_mv AT mullerkatharinafelicitas definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT brielmatthias definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT damarioalexandra definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT kleijnenjos definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT marusicana definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT wagerelizabeth definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT antesgerd definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT vonelmerik definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT langbritta definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT motschalledith definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT gloyviktoria definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT schwarzerguido definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT altmandoug definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT meerpohljoergj definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework
AT basslerdirk definingpublicationbiasprotocolforasystematicreviewofhighlycitedarticlesandproposalforanewframework