Cargando…

Comparisons of maximum deformation and failure forces at the implant–abutment interface of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments with two levels of marginal bone loss

BACKGROUND: Zirconia materials are known for their optimal aesthetics, but they are brittle, and concerns remain about whether their mechanical properties are sufficient for withstanding the forces exerted in the oral cavity. Therefore, this study compared the maximum deformation and failure forces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Chiung-Fang, Huang, Heng-Li, Lin, Dan-Jae, Shen, Yen-Wen, Fuh, Lih-Jyh, Hsu, Jui-Ting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23688204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-45
_version_ 1782271433406152704
author Wang, Chiung-Fang
Huang, Heng-Li
Lin, Dan-Jae
Shen, Yen-Wen
Fuh, Lih-Jyh
Hsu, Jui-Ting
author_facet Wang, Chiung-Fang
Huang, Heng-Li
Lin, Dan-Jae
Shen, Yen-Wen
Fuh, Lih-Jyh
Hsu, Jui-Ting
author_sort Wang, Chiung-Fang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Zirconia materials are known for their optimal aesthetics, but they are brittle, and concerns remain about whether their mechanical properties are sufficient for withstanding the forces exerted in the oral cavity. Therefore, this study compared the maximum deformation and failure forces of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments under oblique compressive forces in the presence of two levels of marginal bone loss. METHODS: Twenty implants were divided into Groups A and B, with simulated bone losses of 3.0 and 1.5 mm, respectively. Groups A and B were also each divided into two subgroups with five implants each: (1) titanium implants connected to titanium-alloy abutments and (2) titanium implants connected to zirconia abutments. The maximum deformation and failure forces of each sample was determined using a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. RESULTS: The mean maximum deformation and failure forces obtained the subgroups were as follows: A1 (simulated bone loss of 3.0 mm, titanium-alloy abutment) = 540.6 N and 656.9 N, respectively; A2 (simulated bone loss of 3.0 mm, zirconia abutment) = 531.8 N and 852.7 N; B1 (simulated bone loss of 1.5 mm, titanium-alloy abutment) = 1070.9 N and 1260.2 N; and B2 (simulated bone loss of 1.5 mm, zirconia abutment) = 907.3 N and 1182.8 N. The maximum deformation force differed significantly between Groups B1 and B2 but not between Groups A1 and A2. The failure force did not differ between Groups A1 and A2 or between Groups B1 and B2. The maximum deformation and failure forces differed significantly between Groups A1 and B1 and between Groups A2 and B2. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this experimental study, the maximum deformation and failure forces are lower for implants with a marginal bone loss of 3.0 mm than of 1.5 mm. Zirconia abutments can withstand physiological occlusal forces applied in the anterior region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36670512013-05-30 Comparisons of maximum deformation and failure forces at the implant–abutment interface of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments with two levels of marginal bone loss Wang, Chiung-Fang Huang, Heng-Li Lin, Dan-Jae Shen, Yen-Wen Fuh, Lih-Jyh Hsu, Jui-Ting Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Zirconia materials are known for their optimal aesthetics, but they are brittle, and concerns remain about whether their mechanical properties are sufficient for withstanding the forces exerted in the oral cavity. Therefore, this study compared the maximum deformation and failure forces of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments under oblique compressive forces in the presence of two levels of marginal bone loss. METHODS: Twenty implants were divided into Groups A and B, with simulated bone losses of 3.0 and 1.5 mm, respectively. Groups A and B were also each divided into two subgroups with five implants each: (1) titanium implants connected to titanium-alloy abutments and (2) titanium implants connected to zirconia abutments. The maximum deformation and failure forces of each sample was determined using a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. RESULTS: The mean maximum deformation and failure forces obtained the subgroups were as follows: A1 (simulated bone loss of 3.0 mm, titanium-alloy abutment) = 540.6 N and 656.9 N, respectively; A2 (simulated bone loss of 3.0 mm, zirconia abutment) = 531.8 N and 852.7 N; B1 (simulated bone loss of 1.5 mm, titanium-alloy abutment) = 1070.9 N and 1260.2 N; and B2 (simulated bone loss of 1.5 mm, zirconia abutment) = 907.3 N and 1182.8 N. The maximum deformation force differed significantly between Groups B1 and B2 but not between Groups A1 and A2. The failure force did not differ between Groups A1 and A2 or between Groups B1 and B2. The maximum deformation and failure forces differed significantly between Groups A1 and B1 and between Groups A2 and B2. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this experimental study, the maximum deformation and failure forces are lower for implants with a marginal bone loss of 3.0 mm than of 1.5 mm. Zirconia abutments can withstand physiological occlusal forces applied in the anterior region. BioMed Central 2013-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3667051/ /pubmed/23688204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-45 Text en Copyright © 2013 Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Chiung-Fang
Huang, Heng-Li
Lin, Dan-Jae
Shen, Yen-Wen
Fuh, Lih-Jyh
Hsu, Jui-Ting
Comparisons of maximum deformation and failure forces at the implant–abutment interface of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments with two levels of marginal bone loss
title Comparisons of maximum deformation and failure forces at the implant–abutment interface of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments with two levels of marginal bone loss
title_full Comparisons of maximum deformation and failure forces at the implant–abutment interface of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments with two levels of marginal bone loss
title_fullStr Comparisons of maximum deformation and failure forces at the implant–abutment interface of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments with two levels of marginal bone loss
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of maximum deformation and failure forces at the implant–abutment interface of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments with two levels of marginal bone loss
title_short Comparisons of maximum deformation and failure forces at the implant–abutment interface of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments with two levels of marginal bone loss
title_sort comparisons of maximum deformation and failure forces at the implant–abutment interface of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments with two levels of marginal bone loss
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23688204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-45
work_keys_str_mv AT wangchiungfang comparisonsofmaximumdeformationandfailureforcesattheimplantabutmentinterfaceoftitaniumimplantsbetweentitaniumalloyandzirconiaabutmentswithtwolevelsofmarginalboneloss
AT huanghengli comparisonsofmaximumdeformationandfailureforcesattheimplantabutmentinterfaceoftitaniumimplantsbetweentitaniumalloyandzirconiaabutmentswithtwolevelsofmarginalboneloss
AT lindanjae comparisonsofmaximumdeformationandfailureforcesattheimplantabutmentinterfaceoftitaniumimplantsbetweentitaniumalloyandzirconiaabutmentswithtwolevelsofmarginalboneloss
AT shenyenwen comparisonsofmaximumdeformationandfailureforcesattheimplantabutmentinterfaceoftitaniumimplantsbetweentitaniumalloyandzirconiaabutmentswithtwolevelsofmarginalboneloss
AT fuhlihjyh comparisonsofmaximumdeformationandfailureforcesattheimplantabutmentinterfaceoftitaniumimplantsbetweentitaniumalloyandzirconiaabutmentswithtwolevelsofmarginalboneloss
AT hsujuiting comparisonsofmaximumdeformationandfailureforcesattheimplantabutmentinterfaceoftitaniumimplantsbetweentitaniumalloyandzirconiaabutmentswithtwolevelsofmarginalboneloss