Cargando…

Grassroots Campaign Trail Methods to Recruit for Clinical Trials: Recruitment Lessons Learned from Trail to Trial

BACKGROUND: Literature reviews have identified recruitment as the single most challenging obstacle in conducting pediatric trials. This paper describes a paradigm shift in recruitment design, developed from experience with grassroots campaigns through the DRINK study (Decreasing the Rates of Illness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Megan, Merenstein, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761994
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMPed.S6488
_version_ 1782271441494867968
author Murphy, Megan
Merenstein, Daniel
author_facet Murphy, Megan
Merenstein, Daniel
author_sort Murphy, Megan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Literature reviews have identified recruitment as the single most challenging obstacle in conducting pediatric trials. This paper describes a paradigm shift in recruitment design, developed from experience with grassroots campaigns through the DRINK study (Decreasing the Rates of Illness in Kids). The objective of this study was to explain a new method for recruiting in clinical trials based on lessons learned from grassroots political campaigning. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The study described is a randomized controlled trial of 638 3–6 year olds from the Washington, DC Area. The design involved a comparison between new recruiting approaches modeled after grassroots campaigns and traditional techniques. Traditional techniques for the purpose of this paper are defined by the use of physician referral, mass media such as radio and television advertisements, along with posters in public places like the subway. Grassroots approaches alternatively developed and utilized community contacts and employed targeted small market media community. The main outcome measures were the percentage of budget used and the number of eligible participants recruited. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the grassroots recruitment approach saved 30% of the budget, recruited 638 kids in 4 months and retained over 90% for the 90 day trial. New techniques need further exploration as community studies are stressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36670862013-06-12 Grassroots Campaign Trail Methods to Recruit for Clinical Trials: Recruitment Lessons Learned from Trail to Trial Murphy, Megan Merenstein, Daniel Clin Med Insights Pediatr Original Research BACKGROUND: Literature reviews have identified recruitment as the single most challenging obstacle in conducting pediatric trials. This paper describes a paradigm shift in recruitment design, developed from experience with grassroots campaigns through the DRINK study (Decreasing the Rates of Illness in Kids). The objective of this study was to explain a new method for recruiting in clinical trials based on lessons learned from grassroots political campaigning. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The study described is a randomized controlled trial of 638 3–6 year olds from the Washington, DC Area. The design involved a comparison between new recruiting approaches modeled after grassroots campaigns and traditional techniques. Traditional techniques for the purpose of this paper are defined by the use of physician referral, mass media such as radio and television advertisements, along with posters in public places like the subway. Grassroots approaches alternatively developed and utilized community contacts and employed targeted small market media community. The main outcome measures were the percentage of budget used and the number of eligible participants recruited. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the grassroots recruitment approach saved 30% of the budget, recruited 638 kids in 4 months and retained over 90% for the 90 day trial. New techniques need further exploration as community studies are stressed. Libertas Academica 2011-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3667086/ /pubmed/23761994 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMPed.S6488 Text en © 2011 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Murphy, Megan
Merenstein, Daniel
Grassroots Campaign Trail Methods to Recruit for Clinical Trials: Recruitment Lessons Learned from Trail to Trial
title Grassroots Campaign Trail Methods to Recruit for Clinical Trials: Recruitment Lessons Learned from Trail to Trial
title_full Grassroots Campaign Trail Methods to Recruit for Clinical Trials: Recruitment Lessons Learned from Trail to Trial
title_fullStr Grassroots Campaign Trail Methods to Recruit for Clinical Trials: Recruitment Lessons Learned from Trail to Trial
title_full_unstemmed Grassroots Campaign Trail Methods to Recruit for Clinical Trials: Recruitment Lessons Learned from Trail to Trial
title_short Grassroots Campaign Trail Methods to Recruit for Clinical Trials: Recruitment Lessons Learned from Trail to Trial
title_sort grassroots campaign trail methods to recruit for clinical trials: recruitment lessons learned from trail to trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761994
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMPed.S6488
work_keys_str_mv AT murphymegan grassrootscampaigntrailmethodstorecruitforclinicaltrialsrecruitmentlessonslearnedfromtrailtotrial
AT merensteindaniel grassrootscampaigntrailmethodstorecruitforclinicaltrialsrecruitmentlessonslearnedfromtrailtotrial