Cargando…

Spatial Probability Dynamically Modulates Visual Target Detection in Chickens

The natural world contains a rich and ever-changing landscape of sensory information. To survive, an organism must be able to flexibly and rapidly locate the most relevant sources of information at any time. Humans and non-human primates exploit regularities in the spatial distribution of relevant s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sridharan, Devarajan, Ramamurthy, Deepa L., Knudsen, Eric I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064136
_version_ 1782271445110358016
author Sridharan, Devarajan
Ramamurthy, Deepa L.
Knudsen, Eric I.
author_facet Sridharan, Devarajan
Ramamurthy, Deepa L.
Knudsen, Eric I.
author_sort Sridharan, Devarajan
collection PubMed
description The natural world contains a rich and ever-changing landscape of sensory information. To survive, an organism must be able to flexibly and rapidly locate the most relevant sources of information at any time. Humans and non-human primates exploit regularities in the spatial distribution of relevant stimuli (targets) to improve detection at locations of high target probability. Is the ability to flexibly modify behavior based on visual experience unique to primates? Chickens (Gallus domesticus) were trained on a multiple alternative Go/NoGo task to detect a small, briefly-flashed dot (target) in each of the quadrants of the visual field. When targets were presented with equal probability (25%) in each quadrant, chickens exhibited a distinct advantage for detecting targets at lower, relative to upper, hemifield locations. Increasing the probability of presentation in the upper hemifield locations (to 80%) dramatically improved detection performance at these locations to be on par with lower hemifield performance. Finally, detection performance in the upper hemifield changed on a rapid timescale, improving with successive target detections, and declining with successive detections at the diagonally opposite location in the lower hemifield. These data indicate the action of a process that in chickens, as in primates, flexibly and dynamically modulates detection performance based on the spatial probabilities of sensory stimuli as well as on recent performance history.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36671022013-06-03 Spatial Probability Dynamically Modulates Visual Target Detection in Chickens Sridharan, Devarajan Ramamurthy, Deepa L. Knudsen, Eric I. PLoS One Research Article The natural world contains a rich and ever-changing landscape of sensory information. To survive, an organism must be able to flexibly and rapidly locate the most relevant sources of information at any time. Humans and non-human primates exploit regularities in the spatial distribution of relevant stimuli (targets) to improve detection at locations of high target probability. Is the ability to flexibly modify behavior based on visual experience unique to primates? Chickens (Gallus domesticus) were trained on a multiple alternative Go/NoGo task to detect a small, briefly-flashed dot (target) in each of the quadrants of the visual field. When targets were presented with equal probability (25%) in each quadrant, chickens exhibited a distinct advantage for detecting targets at lower, relative to upper, hemifield locations. Increasing the probability of presentation in the upper hemifield locations (to 80%) dramatically improved detection performance at these locations to be on par with lower hemifield performance. Finally, detection performance in the upper hemifield changed on a rapid timescale, improving with successive target detections, and declining with successive detections at the diagonally opposite location in the lower hemifield. These data indicate the action of a process that in chickens, as in primates, flexibly and dynamically modulates detection performance based on the spatial probabilities of sensory stimuli as well as on recent performance history. Public Library of Science 2013-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3667102/ /pubmed/23734188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064136 Text en © 2013 Sridharan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sridharan, Devarajan
Ramamurthy, Deepa L.
Knudsen, Eric I.
Spatial Probability Dynamically Modulates Visual Target Detection in Chickens
title Spatial Probability Dynamically Modulates Visual Target Detection in Chickens
title_full Spatial Probability Dynamically Modulates Visual Target Detection in Chickens
title_fullStr Spatial Probability Dynamically Modulates Visual Target Detection in Chickens
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Probability Dynamically Modulates Visual Target Detection in Chickens
title_short Spatial Probability Dynamically Modulates Visual Target Detection in Chickens
title_sort spatial probability dynamically modulates visual target detection in chickens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064136
work_keys_str_mv AT sridharandevarajan spatialprobabilitydynamicallymodulatesvisualtargetdetectioninchickens
AT ramamurthydeepal spatialprobabilitydynamicallymodulatesvisualtargetdetectioninchickens
AT knudsenerici spatialprobabilitydynamicallymodulatesvisualtargetdetectioninchickens