Cargando…

Repeated Activation of a CS-US-Contingency Memory Results in Sustained Conditioned Responding

Individuals seem to differ in conditionability, i.e., the ease by which the contingent presentation of two stimuli will lead to a conditioned response. In contemporary learning theory, individual differences in the etiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders are, among others, explained by individ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joos, Els, Vansteenwegen, Debora, Vervliet, Bram, Hermans, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23755034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00305
_version_ 1782271466606166016
author Joos, Els
Vansteenwegen, Debora
Vervliet, Bram
Hermans, Dirk
author_facet Joos, Els
Vansteenwegen, Debora
Vervliet, Bram
Hermans, Dirk
author_sort Joos, Els
collection PubMed
description Individuals seem to differ in conditionability, i.e., the ease by which the contingent presentation of two stimuli will lead to a conditioned response. In contemporary learning theory, individual differences in the etiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders are, among others, explained by individual differences in temperamental variables (Mineka and Zinbarg, 2006). One such individual difference variable is how people process a learning experience when the conditioning stimuli are no longer present. Repeatedly thinking about the conditioning experience, as in worry or rumination, might prolong the initial (fear) reactions and as such, might leave certain individuals more vulnerable to developing an anxiety disorder. However, in human conditioning research, relatively little attention has been devoted to the processing of a memory trace after its initial acquisition, despite its potential influences on subsequent performance. Post-acquisition processing can be induced by mental reiteration of a conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US)-contingency. Using a human conditioned suppression paradigm, we investigated the effect of repeated activations of a CS-US-contingency memory on the level of conditioned responding at a later test. Results of three experiments showed more sustained responding to a “rehearsed” CS+ as compared to a “non-rehearsed” CS+. Moreover, the second experiment showed no effect of rehearsal when only the CS was rehearsed instead of the CS-US-contingency. The third experiment demonstrated that mental CS-US-rehearsal has the same effect regardless of whether it was cued by the CS and a verbal reference to the US or by a neutral signal, making the rehearsal “purely mental.” In sum, it was demonstrated that post-acquisition activation of a CS-US-contingency memory can impact conditioned responding, underlining the importance of post-acquisition processes in conditioning. This might indicate that individuals who are more prone to mentally rehearse information condition more easily.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36672342013-06-10 Repeated Activation of a CS-US-Contingency Memory Results in Sustained Conditioned Responding Joos, Els Vansteenwegen, Debora Vervliet, Bram Hermans, Dirk Front Psychol Psychology Individuals seem to differ in conditionability, i.e., the ease by which the contingent presentation of two stimuli will lead to a conditioned response. In contemporary learning theory, individual differences in the etiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders are, among others, explained by individual differences in temperamental variables (Mineka and Zinbarg, 2006). One such individual difference variable is how people process a learning experience when the conditioning stimuli are no longer present. Repeatedly thinking about the conditioning experience, as in worry or rumination, might prolong the initial (fear) reactions and as such, might leave certain individuals more vulnerable to developing an anxiety disorder. However, in human conditioning research, relatively little attention has been devoted to the processing of a memory trace after its initial acquisition, despite its potential influences on subsequent performance. Post-acquisition processing can be induced by mental reiteration of a conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US)-contingency. Using a human conditioned suppression paradigm, we investigated the effect of repeated activations of a CS-US-contingency memory on the level of conditioned responding at a later test. Results of three experiments showed more sustained responding to a “rehearsed” CS+ as compared to a “non-rehearsed” CS+. Moreover, the second experiment showed no effect of rehearsal when only the CS was rehearsed instead of the CS-US-contingency. The third experiment demonstrated that mental CS-US-rehearsal has the same effect regardless of whether it was cued by the CS and a verbal reference to the US or by a neutral signal, making the rehearsal “purely mental.” In sum, it was demonstrated that post-acquisition activation of a CS-US-contingency memory can impact conditioned responding, underlining the importance of post-acquisition processes in conditioning. This might indicate that individuals who are more prone to mentally rehearse information condition more easily. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3667234/ /pubmed/23755034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00305 Text en Copyright © 2013 Joos, Vansteenwegen, Vervliet and Hermans. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Joos, Els
Vansteenwegen, Debora
Vervliet, Bram
Hermans, Dirk
Repeated Activation of a CS-US-Contingency Memory Results in Sustained Conditioned Responding
title Repeated Activation of a CS-US-Contingency Memory Results in Sustained Conditioned Responding
title_full Repeated Activation of a CS-US-Contingency Memory Results in Sustained Conditioned Responding
title_fullStr Repeated Activation of a CS-US-Contingency Memory Results in Sustained Conditioned Responding
title_full_unstemmed Repeated Activation of a CS-US-Contingency Memory Results in Sustained Conditioned Responding
title_short Repeated Activation of a CS-US-Contingency Memory Results in Sustained Conditioned Responding
title_sort repeated activation of a cs-us-contingency memory results in sustained conditioned responding
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23755034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00305
work_keys_str_mv AT joosels repeatedactivationofacsuscontingencymemoryresultsinsustainedconditionedresponding
AT vansteenwegendebora repeatedactivationofacsuscontingencymemoryresultsinsustainedconditionedresponding
AT vervlietbram repeatedactivationofacsuscontingencymemoryresultsinsustainedconditionedresponding
AT hermansdirk repeatedactivationofacsuscontingencymemoryresultsinsustainedconditionedresponding