Cargando…

Alopecia Mucinosa Responding to Antileprosy Treatment: Are we Missing Something?

Three cases with single lesion of Alopecia mucinosa (follicular mucinosis) were treated with antileprosy treatment and showed rapid and complete resolution of the lesions with no recurrence on extended follow-up. Two children, a boy aged 14 years and a girl aged 12 years presented themselves, each,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joshi, Rajiv, Gopalani, Vinay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23723476
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.110834
_version_ 1782271474562760704
author Joshi, Rajiv
Gopalani, Vinay
author_facet Joshi, Rajiv
Gopalani, Vinay
author_sort Joshi, Rajiv
collection PubMed
description Three cases with single lesion of Alopecia mucinosa (follicular mucinosis) were treated with antileprosy treatment and showed rapid and complete resolution of the lesions with no recurrence on extended follow-up. Two children, a boy aged 14 years and a girl aged 12 years presented themselves, each, with a single hypopigmented, hypoesthetic patch on the face. Clinically leprosy was suspected, however, skin biopsy from both patients revealed follicular mucinosis as the only pathological finding, without any granulomas. Based on clinical suspicion both were started on multi drug therapy (MDT) for leprosy with complete resolution of the lesions. The third case, male, aged 22 years presented with a single erythematous, hypoesthetic plaque on the forehead. This lesion had been diagnosed as follicular mucinosis with folliculo-tropic mycosis fungoides, in the USA. He too responded completely within 3 months with rifampicin, ofloxacin, minocycline (ROM) treatment, which was given once monthly for a total of 6 months and remains free of disease since the past 1 year. Follicular mucinosis as the only pathology may be seen in facial lesions of clinically suspected leprosy in children and young adults. Based on histological findings these cannot be diagnosed as leprosy and will be considered as Alopecia mucinosa. These lesions, however, are always single and show rapid and complete response to antileprosy treatment. The authors suggest that in regions endemic for leprosy, such as India, single lesion Alopecia mucinosa on the face in children and young adults should be given antileprosy treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36672882013-05-30 Alopecia Mucinosa Responding to Antileprosy Treatment: Are we Missing Something? Joshi, Rajiv Gopalani, Vinay Indian J Dermatol Short Communication Three cases with single lesion of Alopecia mucinosa (follicular mucinosis) were treated with antileprosy treatment and showed rapid and complete resolution of the lesions with no recurrence on extended follow-up. Two children, a boy aged 14 years and a girl aged 12 years presented themselves, each, with a single hypopigmented, hypoesthetic patch on the face. Clinically leprosy was suspected, however, skin biopsy from both patients revealed follicular mucinosis as the only pathological finding, without any granulomas. Based on clinical suspicion both were started on multi drug therapy (MDT) for leprosy with complete resolution of the lesions. The third case, male, aged 22 years presented with a single erythematous, hypoesthetic plaque on the forehead. This lesion had been diagnosed as follicular mucinosis with folliculo-tropic mycosis fungoides, in the USA. He too responded completely within 3 months with rifampicin, ofloxacin, minocycline (ROM) treatment, which was given once monthly for a total of 6 months and remains free of disease since the past 1 year. Follicular mucinosis as the only pathology may be seen in facial lesions of clinically suspected leprosy in children and young adults. Based on histological findings these cannot be diagnosed as leprosy and will be considered as Alopecia mucinosa. These lesions, however, are always single and show rapid and complete response to antileprosy treatment. The authors suggest that in regions endemic for leprosy, such as India, single lesion Alopecia mucinosa on the face in children and young adults should be given antileprosy treatment. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3667288/ /pubmed/23723476 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.110834 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Joshi, Rajiv
Gopalani, Vinay
Alopecia Mucinosa Responding to Antileprosy Treatment: Are we Missing Something?
title Alopecia Mucinosa Responding to Antileprosy Treatment: Are we Missing Something?
title_full Alopecia Mucinosa Responding to Antileprosy Treatment: Are we Missing Something?
title_fullStr Alopecia Mucinosa Responding to Antileprosy Treatment: Are we Missing Something?
title_full_unstemmed Alopecia Mucinosa Responding to Antileprosy Treatment: Are we Missing Something?
title_short Alopecia Mucinosa Responding to Antileprosy Treatment: Are we Missing Something?
title_sort alopecia mucinosa responding to antileprosy treatment: are we missing something?
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23723476
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.110834
work_keys_str_mv AT joshirajiv alopeciamucinosarespondingtoantileprosytreatmentarewemissingsomething
AT gopalanivinay alopeciamucinosarespondingtoantileprosytreatmentarewemissingsomething