Cargando…

Evaluation of Leishmanin Skin Test Reaction in Different Variants of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

INTRODUCTION: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a parasitic disease which has different clinical forms. The aim of this study is to compare the response to leishmanin skin test (LST) in three forms of CL including plaque type, lupoid type, and sporotrichoid type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a desc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadeghian, Giti, Ziaei, Hengameh, Bidabadi, Leila Shirani, Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammad Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23723480
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.110838
_version_ 1782271475470827520
author Sadeghian, Giti
Ziaei, Hengameh
Bidabadi, Leila Shirani
Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammad Ali
author_facet Sadeghian, Giti
Ziaei, Hengameh
Bidabadi, Leila Shirani
Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammad Ali
author_sort Sadeghian, Giti
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a parasitic disease which has different clinical forms. The aim of this study is to compare the response to leishmanin skin test (LST) in three forms of CL including plaque type, lupoid type, and sporotrichoid type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The patients enrolled in this study had three clinical forms of CL confirmed by positive smear of their lesions and then LST was performed for them. Results were categorized as negative (0-5 mm induration), positive (6-14 mm), and strongly positive (≥15 mm). The data were documented in the patients’ files and analyzed with SPSS windows software version 16 (Inc.Chicago, USA). RESULTS: 200 patients were enrolled in the study. In the group with plaque type, 86% had a positive LST, 13.3% were negative, and 0.7% were strongly positive. In the lupoid group, these figures were 45.8%, 8.4%, 45.8%, respectively. In the sporotrichoid group, LST was positive in 27.3%, negative in 72.7%, and none of the patients had a strongly positive reaction (P < 0.05). Discussion: The most of the positive LST were belong to plaque and lupoid groups, the most of strongly positive were belong to lupoid, and the most of negative LST were related with sporotrichoid type. CONCLUSION: It can be suggested that lupoid and sporotrichoid types of CL are parts of a continuous spectrum of the disease with an enhanced cellular immunity in lupoid form and a decreased state in sporotrichoid type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36672922013-05-30 Evaluation of Leishmanin Skin Test Reaction in Different Variants of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Sadeghian, Giti Ziaei, Hengameh Bidabadi, Leila Shirani Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammad Ali Indian J Dermatol E-Study INTRODUCTION: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a parasitic disease which has different clinical forms. The aim of this study is to compare the response to leishmanin skin test (LST) in three forms of CL including plaque type, lupoid type, and sporotrichoid type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The patients enrolled in this study had three clinical forms of CL confirmed by positive smear of their lesions and then LST was performed for them. Results were categorized as negative (0-5 mm induration), positive (6-14 mm), and strongly positive (≥15 mm). The data were documented in the patients’ files and analyzed with SPSS windows software version 16 (Inc.Chicago, USA). RESULTS: 200 patients were enrolled in the study. In the group with plaque type, 86% had a positive LST, 13.3% were negative, and 0.7% were strongly positive. In the lupoid group, these figures were 45.8%, 8.4%, 45.8%, respectively. In the sporotrichoid group, LST was positive in 27.3%, negative in 72.7%, and none of the patients had a strongly positive reaction (P < 0.05). Discussion: The most of the positive LST were belong to plaque and lupoid groups, the most of strongly positive were belong to lupoid, and the most of negative LST were related with sporotrichoid type. CONCLUSION: It can be suggested that lupoid and sporotrichoid types of CL are parts of a continuous spectrum of the disease with an enhanced cellular immunity in lupoid form and a decreased state in sporotrichoid type. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3667292/ /pubmed/23723480 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.110838 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle E-Study
Sadeghian, Giti
Ziaei, Hengameh
Bidabadi, Leila Shirani
Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammad Ali
Evaluation of Leishmanin Skin Test Reaction in Different Variants of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
title Evaluation of Leishmanin Skin Test Reaction in Different Variants of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
title_full Evaluation of Leishmanin Skin Test Reaction in Different Variants of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Leishmanin Skin Test Reaction in Different Variants of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Leishmanin Skin Test Reaction in Different Variants of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
title_short Evaluation of Leishmanin Skin Test Reaction in Different Variants of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
title_sort evaluation of leishmanin skin test reaction in different variants of cutaneous leishmaniasis
topic E-Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23723480
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.110838
work_keys_str_mv AT sadeghiangiti evaluationofleishmaninskintestreactionindifferentvariantsofcutaneousleishmaniasis
AT ziaeihengameh evaluationofleishmaninskintestreactionindifferentvariantsofcutaneousleishmaniasis
AT bidabadileilashirani evaluationofleishmaninskintestreactionindifferentvariantsofcutaneousleishmaniasis
AT nilforoushzadehmohammadali evaluationofleishmaninskintestreactionindifferentvariantsofcutaneousleishmaniasis