Cargando…

Comparison of Intradermal Injection of Autologous Epidermal Cell Suspension vs. Spraying of these Cells on Dermabraded Surface of Skin of Patients with Post-Burn Hypopigmentation

INTRODUCTION: One of the most important complications after burning is hypo/depigmentation. This study was designed to compare two methods of cell spray and intradermal injection of epidermal cell suspension for treatment of burn induced hypopigmentation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, 28 pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iman, Ahrari, Akbar, Mohamadi Ali, Mohsen, Khosravi Maharlooei, Ali, Farsi, Armin, Attar, Sajjad, Ahrari, Ahmad, Monabati, Ghavipisheh, Mahsa, Leila, Rahnama
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23723486
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.110844
_version_ 1782271476852850688
author Iman, Ahrari
Akbar, Mohamadi Ali
Mohsen, Khosravi Maharlooei
Ali, Farsi
Armin, Attar
Sajjad, Ahrari
Ahmad, Monabati
Ghavipisheh, Mahsa
Leila, Rahnama
author_facet Iman, Ahrari
Akbar, Mohamadi Ali
Mohsen, Khosravi Maharlooei
Ali, Farsi
Armin, Attar
Sajjad, Ahrari
Ahmad, Monabati
Ghavipisheh, Mahsa
Leila, Rahnama
author_sort Iman, Ahrari
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: One of the most important complications after burning is hypo/depigmentation. This study was designed to compare two methods of cell spray and intradermal injection of epidermal cell suspension for treatment of burn induced hypopigmentation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, 28 patients with post burn hypo/depigmentation were selected and divided in 2 groups. A small skin biopsy was taken from normal skin of patients in operation room and epidermal cell suspension was prepared using NaBr 4N and trypsin. In the first group, the epidermal cell suspension was sprayed on the wound surface and then the area was dressed with amniotic membrane and gauze. In the second group, the cell suspension was injected in intradermal manner in the hypopigmented area. The patients were followed up and to evaluate the effect of the cells, photos were taken from the area before operation and also at follow-up. Clinical evaluation was done by the surgeon and a clinical score between “0” to “4” was used to demonstrate the clinical status from poor to excellent pigmentation. Skin biopsies were taken from depigmented area before and after interventions. Melanocytes were stained using anti S100 antibody and were counted in ×400 magnification fields. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were in cell spray and 10 were in cell injection groups. Mean change of pigmentation in two group showed that there was no statistical significant differences in pigmentation between two groups, (P value = 0.52) although a limited improvement in pigmentation status was observed in both groups. Regarding melanocyte numbers per field, there was not a significant difference between two groups and also before and after interventions, but melanocyte number increased after treatment in both groups. CONCLUSION: We did not find noticeable differences between cell spray and intradermal injection methods. Although both methods showed a limited effect on pigmentation of depigmented skin, the clinical results were not satisfactorily for both patients and clinicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36672982013-05-30 Comparison of Intradermal Injection of Autologous Epidermal Cell Suspension vs. Spraying of these Cells on Dermabraded Surface of Skin of Patients with Post-Burn Hypopigmentation Iman, Ahrari Akbar, Mohamadi Ali Mohsen, Khosravi Maharlooei Ali, Farsi Armin, Attar Sajjad, Ahrari Ahmad, Monabati Ghavipisheh, Mahsa Leila, Rahnama Indian J Dermatol E-Study INTRODUCTION: One of the most important complications after burning is hypo/depigmentation. This study was designed to compare two methods of cell spray and intradermal injection of epidermal cell suspension for treatment of burn induced hypopigmentation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, 28 patients with post burn hypo/depigmentation were selected and divided in 2 groups. A small skin biopsy was taken from normal skin of patients in operation room and epidermal cell suspension was prepared using NaBr 4N and trypsin. In the first group, the epidermal cell suspension was sprayed on the wound surface and then the area was dressed with amniotic membrane and gauze. In the second group, the cell suspension was injected in intradermal manner in the hypopigmented area. The patients were followed up and to evaluate the effect of the cells, photos were taken from the area before operation and also at follow-up. Clinical evaluation was done by the surgeon and a clinical score between “0” to “4” was used to demonstrate the clinical status from poor to excellent pigmentation. Skin biopsies were taken from depigmented area before and after interventions. Melanocytes were stained using anti S100 antibody and were counted in ×400 magnification fields. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were in cell spray and 10 were in cell injection groups. Mean change of pigmentation in two group showed that there was no statistical significant differences in pigmentation between two groups, (P value = 0.52) although a limited improvement in pigmentation status was observed in both groups. Regarding melanocyte numbers per field, there was not a significant difference between two groups and also before and after interventions, but melanocyte number increased after treatment in both groups. CONCLUSION: We did not find noticeable differences between cell spray and intradermal injection methods. Although both methods showed a limited effect on pigmentation of depigmented skin, the clinical results were not satisfactorily for both patients and clinicians. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3667298/ /pubmed/23723486 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.110844 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle E-Study
Iman, Ahrari
Akbar, Mohamadi Ali
Mohsen, Khosravi Maharlooei
Ali, Farsi
Armin, Attar
Sajjad, Ahrari
Ahmad, Monabati
Ghavipisheh, Mahsa
Leila, Rahnama
Comparison of Intradermal Injection of Autologous Epidermal Cell Suspension vs. Spraying of these Cells on Dermabraded Surface of Skin of Patients with Post-Burn Hypopigmentation
title Comparison of Intradermal Injection of Autologous Epidermal Cell Suspension vs. Spraying of these Cells on Dermabraded Surface of Skin of Patients with Post-Burn Hypopigmentation
title_full Comparison of Intradermal Injection of Autologous Epidermal Cell Suspension vs. Spraying of these Cells on Dermabraded Surface of Skin of Patients with Post-Burn Hypopigmentation
title_fullStr Comparison of Intradermal Injection of Autologous Epidermal Cell Suspension vs. Spraying of these Cells on Dermabraded Surface of Skin of Patients with Post-Burn Hypopigmentation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Intradermal Injection of Autologous Epidermal Cell Suspension vs. Spraying of these Cells on Dermabraded Surface of Skin of Patients with Post-Burn Hypopigmentation
title_short Comparison of Intradermal Injection of Autologous Epidermal Cell Suspension vs. Spraying of these Cells on Dermabraded Surface of Skin of Patients with Post-Burn Hypopigmentation
title_sort comparison of intradermal injection of autologous epidermal cell suspension vs. spraying of these cells on dermabraded surface of skin of patients with post-burn hypopigmentation
topic E-Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23723486
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.110844
work_keys_str_mv AT imanahrari comparisonofintradermalinjectionofautologousepidermalcellsuspensionvssprayingofthesecellsondermabradedsurfaceofskinofpatientswithpostburnhypopigmentation
AT akbarmohamadiali comparisonofintradermalinjectionofautologousepidermalcellsuspensionvssprayingofthesecellsondermabradedsurfaceofskinofpatientswithpostburnhypopigmentation
AT mohsenkhosravimaharlooei comparisonofintradermalinjectionofautologousepidermalcellsuspensionvssprayingofthesecellsondermabradedsurfaceofskinofpatientswithpostburnhypopigmentation
AT alifarsi comparisonofintradermalinjectionofautologousepidermalcellsuspensionvssprayingofthesecellsondermabradedsurfaceofskinofpatientswithpostburnhypopigmentation
AT arminattar comparisonofintradermalinjectionofautologousepidermalcellsuspensionvssprayingofthesecellsondermabradedsurfaceofskinofpatientswithpostburnhypopigmentation
AT sajjadahrari comparisonofintradermalinjectionofautologousepidermalcellsuspensionvssprayingofthesecellsondermabradedsurfaceofskinofpatientswithpostburnhypopigmentation
AT ahmadmonabati comparisonofintradermalinjectionofautologousepidermalcellsuspensionvssprayingofthesecellsondermabradedsurfaceofskinofpatientswithpostburnhypopigmentation
AT ghavipishehmahsa comparisonofintradermalinjectionofautologousepidermalcellsuspensionvssprayingofthesecellsondermabradedsurfaceofskinofpatientswithpostburnhypopigmentation
AT leilarahnama comparisonofintradermalinjectionofautologousepidermalcellsuspensionvssprayingofthesecellsondermabradedsurfaceofskinofpatientswithpostburnhypopigmentation