Cargando…

Prefrontal inhibition of threat processing reduces working memory interference

Bottom-up processes can interrupt ongoing cognitive processing in order to adaptively respond to emotional stimuli of high potential significance, such as those that threaten wellbeing. However it is vital that this interference can be modulated in certain contexts to focus on current tasks. Deficit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clarke, Robert, Johnstone, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00228
_version_ 1782271507282526208
author Clarke, Robert
Johnstone, Tom
author_facet Clarke, Robert
Johnstone, Tom
author_sort Clarke, Robert
collection PubMed
description Bottom-up processes can interrupt ongoing cognitive processing in order to adaptively respond to emotional stimuli of high potential significance, such as those that threaten wellbeing. However it is vital that this interference can be modulated in certain contexts to focus on current tasks. Deficits in the ability to maintain the appropriate balance between cognitive and emotional demands can severely impact on day-to-day activities. This fMRI study examined this interaction between threat processing and cognition; 18 adult participants performed a visuospatial working memory (WM) task with two load conditions, in the presence and absence of anxiety induction by threat of electric shock. Threat of shock interfered with performance in the low cognitive load condition; however interference was eradicated under high load, consistent with engagement of emotion regulation mechanisms. Under low load the amygdala showed significant activation to threat of shock that was modulated by high cognitive load. A directed top-down control contrast identified two regions associated with top-down control; ventrolateral PFC and dorsal ACC. Dynamic causal modeling provided further evidence that under high cognitive load, top-down inhibition is exerted on the amygdala and its outputs to prefrontal regions. Additionally, we hypothesized that individual differences in a separate, non-emotional top-down control task would predict the recruitment of dorsal ACC and ventrolateral PFC during top-down control of threat. Consistent with this, performance on a separate dichotic listening task predicted dorsal ACC and ventrolateral PFC activation during high WM load under threat of shock, though activation in these regions did not directly correlate with WM performance. Together, the findings suggest that under high cognitive load and threat, top-down control is exerted by dACC and vlPFC to inhibit threat processing, thus enabling WM performance without threat-related interference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36675462013-06-07 Prefrontal inhibition of threat processing reduces working memory interference Clarke, Robert Johnstone, Tom Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Bottom-up processes can interrupt ongoing cognitive processing in order to adaptively respond to emotional stimuli of high potential significance, such as those that threaten wellbeing. However it is vital that this interference can be modulated in certain contexts to focus on current tasks. Deficits in the ability to maintain the appropriate balance between cognitive and emotional demands can severely impact on day-to-day activities. This fMRI study examined this interaction between threat processing and cognition; 18 adult participants performed a visuospatial working memory (WM) task with two load conditions, in the presence and absence of anxiety induction by threat of electric shock. Threat of shock interfered with performance in the low cognitive load condition; however interference was eradicated under high load, consistent with engagement of emotion regulation mechanisms. Under low load the amygdala showed significant activation to threat of shock that was modulated by high cognitive load. A directed top-down control contrast identified two regions associated with top-down control; ventrolateral PFC and dorsal ACC. Dynamic causal modeling provided further evidence that under high cognitive load, top-down inhibition is exerted on the amygdala and its outputs to prefrontal regions. Additionally, we hypothesized that individual differences in a separate, non-emotional top-down control task would predict the recruitment of dorsal ACC and ventrolateral PFC during top-down control of threat. Consistent with this, performance on a separate dichotic listening task predicted dorsal ACC and ventrolateral PFC activation during high WM load under threat of shock, though activation in these regions did not directly correlate with WM performance. Together, the findings suggest that under high cognitive load and threat, top-down control is exerted by dACC and vlPFC to inhibit threat processing, thus enabling WM performance without threat-related interference. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3667546/ /pubmed/23750133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00228 Text en Copyright © 2013 Clarke and Johnstone. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Clarke, Robert
Johnstone, Tom
Prefrontal inhibition of threat processing reduces working memory interference
title Prefrontal inhibition of threat processing reduces working memory interference
title_full Prefrontal inhibition of threat processing reduces working memory interference
title_fullStr Prefrontal inhibition of threat processing reduces working memory interference
title_full_unstemmed Prefrontal inhibition of threat processing reduces working memory interference
title_short Prefrontal inhibition of threat processing reduces working memory interference
title_sort prefrontal inhibition of threat processing reduces working memory interference
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00228
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkerobert prefrontalinhibitionofthreatprocessingreducesworkingmemoryinterference
AT johnstonetom prefrontalinhibitionofthreatprocessingreducesworkingmemoryinterference