Cargando…

Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response

Gastric carcinoma (GC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Surgical resection is the only cure available and is dependent on the GC stage at presentation, which incorporates depth of tumor invasion, extent of lymph node and distant metastases. Accurate preoperative st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hallinan, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy, Venkatesh, Sudhakar Kundapur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: e-Med 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23722535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0023
_version_ 1782271508494680064
author Hallinan, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy
Venkatesh, Sudhakar Kundapur
author_facet Hallinan, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy
Venkatesh, Sudhakar Kundapur
author_sort Hallinan, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy
collection PubMed
description Gastric carcinoma (GC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Surgical resection is the only cure available and is dependent on the GC stage at presentation, which incorporates depth of tumor invasion, extent of lymph node and distant metastases. Accurate preoperative staging is therefore essential for optimal surgical management with consideration of preoperative and/or postoperative chemotherapy. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with its ability to assess tumor depth, nodal disease and metastases is the preferred technique for staging GC. Endoscopic ultrasonography is more accurate for assessing the depth of wall invasion in early cancer, but is limited in the assessment of advanced local or stenotic cancer and detection of distant metastases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), although useful for staging, is not proven to be effective. Positron emission tomography (PET) is most useful for detecting and characterizing distant metastases. Both MDCT and PET are useful for assessment of treatment response following preoperative chemotherapy and for detection of recurrence after surgical resection. This review article discusses the usefulness of imaging modalities for detecting, staging and assessing treatment response for GC and the potential role of newer applications including CT volumetry, virtual gastroscopy and perfusion CT in the management of GC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher e-Med
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36675682014-06-13 Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response Hallinan, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Venkatesh, Sudhakar Kundapur Cancer Imaging Review Gastric carcinoma (GC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Surgical resection is the only cure available and is dependent on the GC stage at presentation, which incorporates depth of tumor invasion, extent of lymph node and distant metastases. Accurate preoperative staging is therefore essential for optimal surgical management with consideration of preoperative and/or postoperative chemotherapy. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with its ability to assess tumor depth, nodal disease and metastases is the preferred technique for staging GC. Endoscopic ultrasonography is more accurate for assessing the depth of wall invasion in early cancer, but is limited in the assessment of advanced local or stenotic cancer and detection of distant metastases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), although useful for staging, is not proven to be effective. Positron emission tomography (PET) is most useful for detecting and characterizing distant metastases. Both MDCT and PET are useful for assessment of treatment response following preoperative chemotherapy and for detection of recurrence after surgical resection. This review article discusses the usefulness of imaging modalities for detecting, staging and assessing treatment response for GC and the potential role of newer applications including CT volumetry, virtual gastroscopy and perfusion CT in the management of GC. e-Med 2013-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3667568/ /pubmed/23722535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0023 Text en © 2013 International Cancer Imaging Society
spellingShingle Review
Hallinan, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy
Venkatesh, Sudhakar Kundapur
Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response
title Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response
title_full Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response
title_fullStr Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response
title_full_unstemmed Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response
title_short Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response
title_sort gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23722535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0023
work_keys_str_mv AT hallinanjamesthomaspatrickdecourcy gastriccarcinomaimagingdiagnosisstagingandassessmentoftreatmentresponse
AT venkateshsudhakarkundapur gastriccarcinomaimagingdiagnosisstagingandassessmentoftreatmentresponse