Cargando…

The Role of Mechanical Force and ROS in Integrin-Dependent Signals

Cells are exposed to several types of integrin stimuli, which generate responses generally referred to as “integrin signals”, but the specific responses to different integrin stimuli are poorly defined. In this study, signals induced by integrin ligation during cell attachment, mechanical force from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeller, Kathrin S., Riaz, Anjum, Sarve, Hamid, Li, Jia, Tengholm, Anders, Johansson, Staffan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23738008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064897
_version_ 1782271536337518592
author Zeller, Kathrin S.
Riaz, Anjum
Sarve, Hamid
Li, Jia
Tengholm, Anders
Johansson, Staffan
author_facet Zeller, Kathrin S.
Riaz, Anjum
Sarve, Hamid
Li, Jia
Tengholm, Anders
Johansson, Staffan
author_sort Zeller, Kathrin S.
collection PubMed
description Cells are exposed to several types of integrin stimuli, which generate responses generally referred to as “integrin signals”, but the specific responses to different integrin stimuli are poorly defined. In this study, signals induced by integrin ligation during cell attachment, mechanical force from intracellular contraction, or cell stretching by external force were compared. The elevated phosphorylation levels of several proteins during the early phase of cell attachment and spreading of fibroblast cell lines were not affected by inhibition of ROCK and myosin II activity, i.e. the reactions occurred independently of intracellular contractile force acting on the adhesion sites. The contraction-independent phosphorylation sites included ERK1/2 T202/Y204, AKT S473, p130CAS Y410, and cofilin S3. In contrast to cell attachment, cyclic stretching of the adherent cells induced a robust phosphorylation only of ERK1/2 and the phosphorylation levels of the other investigated proteins were not or only moderately affected by stretching. No major differences between signaling via α5β1 or αvβ3 integrins were detected. The importance of mitochondrial ROS for the integrin-induced signaling pathways was investigated using rotenone, a specific inhibitor of complex I in the respiratory chain. While rotenone only moderately reduced ATP levels and hardly affected the signals induced by cyclic cell stretching, it abolished the activation of AKT and reduced the actin polymerization rate in response to attachment in both cell lines. In contrast, scavenging of extracellular ROS with catalase or the vitamin C analog Asc-2P did not significantly influence the attachment-derived signaling, but caused a selective and pronounced enhancement of ERK1/2 phosphorylation in response to stretching. In conclusion, the results showed that “integrin signals” are composed of separate sets of reactions triggered by different types of integrin stimulation. Mitochondrial ROS and extracellular ROS had specific and distinct effects on the integrin signals induced by cell attachment and mechanical stretching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36678092013-06-04 The Role of Mechanical Force and ROS in Integrin-Dependent Signals Zeller, Kathrin S. Riaz, Anjum Sarve, Hamid Li, Jia Tengholm, Anders Johansson, Staffan PLoS One Research Article Cells are exposed to several types of integrin stimuli, which generate responses generally referred to as “integrin signals”, but the specific responses to different integrin stimuli are poorly defined. In this study, signals induced by integrin ligation during cell attachment, mechanical force from intracellular contraction, or cell stretching by external force were compared. The elevated phosphorylation levels of several proteins during the early phase of cell attachment and spreading of fibroblast cell lines were not affected by inhibition of ROCK and myosin II activity, i.e. the reactions occurred independently of intracellular contractile force acting on the adhesion sites. The contraction-independent phosphorylation sites included ERK1/2 T202/Y204, AKT S473, p130CAS Y410, and cofilin S3. In contrast to cell attachment, cyclic stretching of the adherent cells induced a robust phosphorylation only of ERK1/2 and the phosphorylation levels of the other investigated proteins were not or only moderately affected by stretching. No major differences between signaling via α5β1 or αvβ3 integrins were detected. The importance of mitochondrial ROS for the integrin-induced signaling pathways was investigated using rotenone, a specific inhibitor of complex I in the respiratory chain. While rotenone only moderately reduced ATP levels and hardly affected the signals induced by cyclic cell stretching, it abolished the activation of AKT and reduced the actin polymerization rate in response to attachment in both cell lines. In contrast, scavenging of extracellular ROS with catalase or the vitamin C analog Asc-2P did not significantly influence the attachment-derived signaling, but caused a selective and pronounced enhancement of ERK1/2 phosphorylation in response to stretching. In conclusion, the results showed that “integrin signals” are composed of separate sets of reactions triggered by different types of integrin stimulation. Mitochondrial ROS and extracellular ROS had specific and distinct effects on the integrin signals induced by cell attachment and mechanical stretching. Public Library of Science 2013-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3667809/ /pubmed/23738008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064897 Text en © 2013 Zeller et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zeller, Kathrin S.
Riaz, Anjum
Sarve, Hamid
Li, Jia
Tengholm, Anders
Johansson, Staffan
The Role of Mechanical Force and ROS in Integrin-Dependent Signals
title The Role of Mechanical Force and ROS in Integrin-Dependent Signals
title_full The Role of Mechanical Force and ROS in Integrin-Dependent Signals
title_fullStr The Role of Mechanical Force and ROS in Integrin-Dependent Signals
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Mechanical Force and ROS in Integrin-Dependent Signals
title_short The Role of Mechanical Force and ROS in Integrin-Dependent Signals
title_sort role of mechanical force and ros in integrin-dependent signals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23738008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064897
work_keys_str_mv AT zellerkathrins theroleofmechanicalforceandrosinintegrindependentsignals
AT riazanjum theroleofmechanicalforceandrosinintegrindependentsignals
AT sarvehamid theroleofmechanicalforceandrosinintegrindependentsignals
AT lijia theroleofmechanicalforceandrosinintegrindependentsignals
AT tengholmanders theroleofmechanicalforceandrosinintegrindependentsignals
AT johanssonstaffan theroleofmechanicalforceandrosinintegrindependentsignals
AT zellerkathrins roleofmechanicalforceandrosinintegrindependentsignals
AT riazanjum roleofmechanicalforceandrosinintegrindependentsignals
AT sarvehamid roleofmechanicalforceandrosinintegrindependentsignals
AT lijia roleofmechanicalforceandrosinintegrindependentsignals
AT tengholmanders roleofmechanicalforceandrosinintegrindependentsignals
AT johanssonstaffan roleofmechanicalforceandrosinintegrindependentsignals