Cargando…

Increased Crown-To-Implant Ratio May Not Be a Risk Factor for Dental Implant Failure under Appropriate Plaque Control

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether increased crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio influences implant stability or not under proper healthy control of peri-implant mucosa. The hypothesis of this study is that implant stability can be maintained despite High C/I, under appropriate plaque...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okada, Shinsuke, Koretake, Katsunori, Miyamoto, Yasunari, Oue, Hiroshi, Akagawa, Yasumasa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23737960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063992
_version_ 1782271542767386624
author Okada, Shinsuke
Koretake, Katsunori
Miyamoto, Yasunari
Oue, Hiroshi
Akagawa, Yasumasa
author_facet Okada, Shinsuke
Koretake, Katsunori
Miyamoto, Yasunari
Oue, Hiroshi
Akagawa, Yasumasa
author_sort Okada, Shinsuke
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether increased crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio influences implant stability or not under proper healthy control of peri-implant mucosa. The hypothesis of this study is that implant stability can be maintained despite High C/I, under appropriate plaque control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five male Beagle-Labrador hybrid dogs (2 years old) were used. Their bilateral mandibular premolar extraction was performed. After allowing 12 weeks for bone healing, 3 types of vertical marginal bone loss were simultaneously prepared randomly. Then, 30 titanium implants were placed in the edentulous areas and defined as High C/I, Mid C/I and Low C/I groups. This time point was designated as the baseline (0 Week). Twelve weeks after implant placement, metal superstructures were cemented to the implants and an occlusal plate was set at the opposite side. At the same time, Calcein green was injected for remodeling evaluation. Implants were loaded by feeding the dogs a hard pellet diet. Tooth brushing was performed 5 days per week during the study to maintain healthy peri-implant mucosa. Twenty-four weeks following implant placement, the interface structure was evaluated clinically, radiologically, and histologically. RESULT: Implant stability quotient (ISQ) increased with time in all 3 groups, without any significant correlation with the C/I value (p >0.05). Moreover, mean marginal bone loss adjacent around implants in all 3 groups ranged between 0.11 and 0.19 mm, with no significant difference (p >0.05). Many fluorescence-labeled bones are shown in the High C/I group. It is considered that high remodeling activity prevent marginal bone loss in the High C/I group and this may provide favorable implant stability under proper plaque control. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that increased C/I may not be a risk factor for implant failure if the peri-implant mucosa is kept healthy, as was the case in this animal model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36678372013-06-04 Increased Crown-To-Implant Ratio May Not Be a Risk Factor for Dental Implant Failure under Appropriate Plaque Control Okada, Shinsuke Koretake, Katsunori Miyamoto, Yasunari Oue, Hiroshi Akagawa, Yasumasa PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether increased crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio influences implant stability or not under proper healthy control of peri-implant mucosa. The hypothesis of this study is that implant stability can be maintained despite High C/I, under appropriate plaque control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five male Beagle-Labrador hybrid dogs (2 years old) were used. Their bilateral mandibular premolar extraction was performed. After allowing 12 weeks for bone healing, 3 types of vertical marginal bone loss were simultaneously prepared randomly. Then, 30 titanium implants were placed in the edentulous areas and defined as High C/I, Mid C/I and Low C/I groups. This time point was designated as the baseline (0 Week). Twelve weeks after implant placement, metal superstructures were cemented to the implants and an occlusal plate was set at the opposite side. At the same time, Calcein green was injected for remodeling evaluation. Implants were loaded by feeding the dogs a hard pellet diet. Tooth brushing was performed 5 days per week during the study to maintain healthy peri-implant mucosa. Twenty-four weeks following implant placement, the interface structure was evaluated clinically, radiologically, and histologically. RESULT: Implant stability quotient (ISQ) increased with time in all 3 groups, without any significant correlation with the C/I value (p >0.05). Moreover, mean marginal bone loss adjacent around implants in all 3 groups ranged between 0.11 and 0.19 mm, with no significant difference (p >0.05). Many fluorescence-labeled bones are shown in the High C/I group. It is considered that high remodeling activity prevent marginal bone loss in the High C/I group and this may provide favorable implant stability under proper plaque control. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that increased C/I may not be a risk factor for implant failure if the peri-implant mucosa is kept healthy, as was the case in this animal model. Public Library of Science 2013-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3667837/ /pubmed/23737960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063992 Text en © 2013 Okada et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Okada, Shinsuke
Koretake, Katsunori
Miyamoto, Yasunari
Oue, Hiroshi
Akagawa, Yasumasa
Increased Crown-To-Implant Ratio May Not Be a Risk Factor for Dental Implant Failure under Appropriate Plaque Control
title Increased Crown-To-Implant Ratio May Not Be a Risk Factor for Dental Implant Failure under Appropriate Plaque Control
title_full Increased Crown-To-Implant Ratio May Not Be a Risk Factor for Dental Implant Failure under Appropriate Plaque Control
title_fullStr Increased Crown-To-Implant Ratio May Not Be a Risk Factor for Dental Implant Failure under Appropriate Plaque Control
title_full_unstemmed Increased Crown-To-Implant Ratio May Not Be a Risk Factor for Dental Implant Failure under Appropriate Plaque Control
title_short Increased Crown-To-Implant Ratio May Not Be a Risk Factor for Dental Implant Failure under Appropriate Plaque Control
title_sort increased crown-to-implant ratio may not be a risk factor for dental implant failure under appropriate plaque control
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23737960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063992
work_keys_str_mv AT okadashinsuke increasedcrowntoimplantratiomaynotbeariskfactorfordentalimplantfailureunderappropriateplaquecontrol
AT koretakekatsunori increasedcrowntoimplantratiomaynotbeariskfactorfordentalimplantfailureunderappropriateplaquecontrol
AT miyamotoyasunari increasedcrowntoimplantratiomaynotbeariskfactorfordentalimplantfailureunderappropriateplaquecontrol
AT ouehiroshi increasedcrowntoimplantratiomaynotbeariskfactorfordentalimplantfailureunderappropriateplaquecontrol
AT akagawayasumasa increasedcrowntoimplantratiomaynotbeariskfactorfordentalimplantfailureunderappropriateplaquecontrol