Cargando…

Ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography of white without pressure

PURPOSE: To describe ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFA) findings in eyes with white without pressure (WWOP) and in eyes without any obvious peripheral chorioretinal disease, and to determine if a difference exists between these two groups. METHODS: A retrospective review of 379 eyes unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orlin, Anton, Fatoo, Aalya, Ehrlich, Joshua, D’Amico, Donald J, Chan, RV Paul, Kiss, Szilárd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23737658
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S43450
_version_ 1782271559999684608
author Orlin, Anton
Fatoo, Aalya
Ehrlich, Joshua
D’Amico, Donald J
Chan, RV Paul
Kiss, Szilárd
author_facet Orlin, Anton
Fatoo, Aalya
Ehrlich, Joshua
D’Amico, Donald J
Chan, RV Paul
Kiss, Szilárd
author_sort Orlin, Anton
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To describe ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFA) findings in eyes with white without pressure (WWOP) and in eyes without any obvious peripheral chorioretinal disease, and to determine if a difference exists between these two groups. METHODS: A retrospective review of 379 eyes undergoing diagnostic UWFA using the Optos 200Tx imaging system. Eyes were excluded if the quality of the color photograph or UWFA prevented reliable evaluation. Eyes were also excluded if there was any evidence of peripheral retinal or choroidal disease, which was thought to have an effect on UWFA (eg, peripheral background diabetic or hypertensive retinopathy, vein occlusion, or any other peripheral vascular disorder). Eyes were determined to have WWOP, based on a dilated fundus examination and color fundus photography that contained areas of peripheral retinal whitening consistent with the diagnosis. UWFA was evaluated by trained masked graders, and determined to have or not have peripheral vascular leakage and/or staining. RESULTS: Of the 379 eyes evaluated, 45 eyes were included in the study. Twelve eyes were determined to have peripheral WWOP; 33 eyes did not have WWOP on examination or color fundus photography. Three common UWFA peripheral patterns were visualized. Eyes with and without WWOP were grouped into one of three patterns. The majority of eyes without WWOP demonstrated UWFA pattern one (69.7%), while those in the WWOP group demonstrated pattern three (50%). The distribution of UWFA patterns is statistically different between those with and without WWOP (P = 0.002). In eyes without WWOP, in patients with no documented systemic microvascular disease (diabetes, hypertension), 71.4% of eyes had UWFA pattern one while 14.3% had both patterns two and three. CONCLUSION: This study is one of the first to specifically evaluate peripheral vascular leakage/staining in eyes with WWOP as well as in eyes without any obvious peripheral chorioretinal disease. We demonstrate that a significant portion of WWOP eyes exhibit peripheral findings on UWFA (pattern one) compared to eyes without WWOP. Importantly, even in eyes that are apparently unremarkable in the periphery on exam and color photography, UWFA can still show peripheral vascular abnormalities. These results warrant further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3667996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36679962013-06-04 Ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography of white without pressure Orlin, Anton Fatoo, Aalya Ehrlich, Joshua D’Amico, Donald J Chan, RV Paul Kiss, Szilárd Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To describe ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFA) findings in eyes with white without pressure (WWOP) and in eyes without any obvious peripheral chorioretinal disease, and to determine if a difference exists between these two groups. METHODS: A retrospective review of 379 eyes undergoing diagnostic UWFA using the Optos 200Tx imaging system. Eyes were excluded if the quality of the color photograph or UWFA prevented reliable evaluation. Eyes were also excluded if there was any evidence of peripheral retinal or choroidal disease, which was thought to have an effect on UWFA (eg, peripheral background diabetic or hypertensive retinopathy, vein occlusion, or any other peripheral vascular disorder). Eyes were determined to have WWOP, based on a dilated fundus examination and color fundus photography that contained areas of peripheral retinal whitening consistent with the diagnosis. UWFA was evaluated by trained masked graders, and determined to have or not have peripheral vascular leakage and/or staining. RESULTS: Of the 379 eyes evaluated, 45 eyes were included in the study. Twelve eyes were determined to have peripheral WWOP; 33 eyes did not have WWOP on examination or color fundus photography. Three common UWFA peripheral patterns were visualized. Eyes with and without WWOP were grouped into one of three patterns. The majority of eyes without WWOP demonstrated UWFA pattern one (69.7%), while those in the WWOP group demonstrated pattern three (50%). The distribution of UWFA patterns is statistically different between those with and without WWOP (P = 0.002). In eyes without WWOP, in patients with no documented systemic microvascular disease (diabetes, hypertension), 71.4% of eyes had UWFA pattern one while 14.3% had both patterns two and three. CONCLUSION: This study is one of the first to specifically evaluate peripheral vascular leakage/staining in eyes with WWOP as well as in eyes without any obvious peripheral chorioretinal disease. We demonstrate that a significant portion of WWOP eyes exhibit peripheral findings on UWFA (pattern one) compared to eyes without WWOP. Importantly, even in eyes that are apparently unremarkable in the periphery on exam and color photography, UWFA can still show peripheral vascular abnormalities. These results warrant further investigation. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3667996/ /pubmed/23737658 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S43450 Text en © 2013 Orlin et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Orlin, Anton
Fatoo, Aalya
Ehrlich, Joshua
D’Amico, Donald J
Chan, RV Paul
Kiss, Szilárd
Ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography of white without pressure
title Ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography of white without pressure
title_full Ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography of white without pressure
title_fullStr Ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography of white without pressure
title_full_unstemmed Ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography of white without pressure
title_short Ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography of white without pressure
title_sort ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography of white without pressure
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23737658
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S43450
work_keys_str_mv AT orlinanton ultrawidefieldfluoresceinangiographyofwhitewithoutpressure
AT fatooaalya ultrawidefieldfluoresceinangiographyofwhitewithoutpressure
AT ehrlichjoshua ultrawidefieldfluoresceinangiographyofwhitewithoutpressure
AT damicodonaldj ultrawidefieldfluoresceinangiographyofwhitewithoutpressure
AT chanrvpaul ultrawidefieldfluoresceinangiographyofwhitewithoutpressure
AT kissszilard ultrawidefieldfluoresceinangiographyofwhitewithoutpressure