Cargando…

A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: The operator effect

Objectives: This in vivo study was carried out to assess the influence of the operator experience on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations using a two-layer technique to insert the glass-ionomer cement (GIC). Study Design: Forty five proximal cavities in primary molars were restored in a sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonifácio, Clarissa C., Hesse, Daniela, Bönecker, Marcelo, Van Loveren, Cor, Van Amerongen, W E., Raggio, Daniela P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3668884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23524424
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18497
_version_ 1782271658517594112
author Bonifácio, Clarissa C.
Hesse, Daniela
Bönecker, Marcelo
Van Loveren, Cor
Van Amerongen, W E.
Raggio, Daniela P.
author_facet Bonifácio, Clarissa C.
Hesse, Daniela
Bönecker, Marcelo
Van Loveren, Cor
Van Amerongen, W E.
Raggio, Daniela P.
author_sort Bonifácio, Clarissa C.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: This in vivo study was carried out to assess the influence of the operator experience on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations using a two-layer technique to insert the glass-ionomer cement (GIC). Study Design: Forty five proximal cavities in primary molars were restored in a school setting according to the ART technique. The cavities were restored by two operators with Ketac Molar Easymix, and received a flowable layer of GIC prior to a second GIC layer with a regular consistency. The operators had different clinical experiences with ART (no experience or two years of experience), but both completed a one-week training to perform the restorations and the GIC mixing in this study. Results: After a 12-month follow-up, 74% of the restorations survived; the main reason for failure was bulk fracture or total loss of the restoration.There was no operator influence (log-rank test p=0.2) Conclusion: The results encourage future well designed controlled clinical trials using the two-layer technique for insertion of GIC in proximal-ART restorations, after training the operators. Key words:Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART), Glass-ionomer, proximal restorations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3668884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36688842013-05-31 A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: The operator effect Bonifácio, Clarissa C. Hesse, Daniela Bönecker, Marcelo Van Loveren, Cor Van Amerongen, W E. Raggio, Daniela P. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research-Article Objectives: This in vivo study was carried out to assess the influence of the operator experience on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations using a two-layer technique to insert the glass-ionomer cement (GIC). Study Design: Forty five proximal cavities in primary molars were restored in a school setting according to the ART technique. The cavities were restored by two operators with Ketac Molar Easymix, and received a flowable layer of GIC prior to a second GIC layer with a regular consistency. The operators had different clinical experiences with ART (no experience or two years of experience), but both completed a one-week training to perform the restorations and the GIC mixing in this study. Results: After a 12-month follow-up, 74% of the restorations survived; the main reason for failure was bulk fracture or total loss of the restoration.There was no operator influence (log-rank test p=0.2) Conclusion: The results encourage future well designed controlled clinical trials using the two-layer technique for insertion of GIC in proximal-ART restorations, after training the operators. Key words:Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART), Glass-ionomer, proximal restorations. Medicina Oral S.L. 2013-05 2013-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3668884/ /pubmed/23524424 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18497 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research-Article
Bonifácio, Clarissa C.
Hesse, Daniela
Bönecker, Marcelo
Van Loveren, Cor
Van Amerongen, W E.
Raggio, Daniela P.
A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: The operator effect
title A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: The operator effect
title_full A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: The operator effect
title_fullStr A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: The operator effect
title_full_unstemmed A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: The operator effect
title_short A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: The operator effect
title_sort preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-art restorations: the operator effect
topic Research-Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3668884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23524424
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18497
work_keys_str_mv AT bonifacioclarissac apreliminaryclinicaltrialusingflowableglassionomercementasalinerinproximalartrestorationstheoperatoreffect
AT hessedaniela apreliminaryclinicaltrialusingflowableglassionomercementasalinerinproximalartrestorationstheoperatoreffect
AT boneckermarcelo apreliminaryclinicaltrialusingflowableglassionomercementasalinerinproximalartrestorationstheoperatoreffect
AT vanloverencor apreliminaryclinicaltrialusingflowableglassionomercementasalinerinproximalartrestorationstheoperatoreffect
AT vanamerongenwe apreliminaryclinicaltrialusingflowableglassionomercementasalinerinproximalartrestorationstheoperatoreffect
AT raggiodanielap apreliminaryclinicaltrialusingflowableglassionomercementasalinerinproximalartrestorationstheoperatoreffect
AT bonifacioclarissac preliminaryclinicaltrialusingflowableglassionomercementasalinerinproximalartrestorationstheoperatoreffect
AT hessedaniela preliminaryclinicaltrialusingflowableglassionomercementasalinerinproximalartrestorationstheoperatoreffect
AT boneckermarcelo preliminaryclinicaltrialusingflowableglassionomercementasalinerinproximalartrestorationstheoperatoreffect
AT vanloverencor preliminaryclinicaltrialusingflowableglassionomercementasalinerinproximalartrestorationstheoperatoreffect
AT vanamerongenwe preliminaryclinicaltrialusingflowableglassionomercementasalinerinproximalartrestorationstheoperatoreffect
AT raggiodanielap preliminaryclinicaltrialusingflowableglassionomercementasalinerinproximalartrestorationstheoperatoreffect