Cargando…
Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate
What constitutes an adequate surgical margin in partial mastectomy is still controversial: intra-operative specimen radiogram is commonly used during partial mastectomy for nonpalpable lesions in order verify the adequacy of the resection but what margin is to be considered “adequate” is still debat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3669500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23741658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-243 |
_version_ | 1782271765052915712 |
---|---|
author | Buggi, Federico Mingozzi, Matteo Curcio, Annalisa Rossi, Camilla Nanni, Oriana Bedei, Lucia Sanna, Paola A Veltri, Salvatore Folli, Secondo |
author_facet | Buggi, Federico Mingozzi, Matteo Curcio, Annalisa Rossi, Camilla Nanni, Oriana Bedei, Lucia Sanna, Paola A Veltri, Salvatore Folli, Secondo |
author_sort | Buggi, Federico |
collection | PubMed |
description | What constitutes an adequate surgical margin in partial mastectomy is still controversial: intra-operative specimen radiogram is commonly used during partial mastectomy for nonpalpable lesions in order verify the adequacy of the resection but what margin is to be considered “adequate” is still debatable. An intraoperative specimen mammogram was performed during all consecutive conservative resections for nonpalpable DCIS and a 15-mm radiological margin was considered “adequate”. Margins were pathologically assessed and classified as “negative”, “close” or “positive” and the rate of margin involvement constitued the main outcome of the study. Among 272 conservative interventions, 80.51% had negative margins at final pathology, 3.31% had close margins and 16.18% had positive margins. An intraoperative “adequate” margin of 15 mm as defined on intraoperative specimen mammogram granted a high rate of histologically negative margin at primary surgery; this finding was paralleled by confirmation of the treatment as conservative in 95% of cases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-243) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3669500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36695002013-06-03 Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate Buggi, Federico Mingozzi, Matteo Curcio, Annalisa Rossi, Camilla Nanni, Oriana Bedei, Lucia Sanna, Paola A Veltri, Salvatore Folli, Secondo Springerplus Research What constitutes an adequate surgical margin in partial mastectomy is still controversial: intra-operative specimen radiogram is commonly used during partial mastectomy for nonpalpable lesions in order verify the adequacy of the resection but what margin is to be considered “adequate” is still debatable. An intraoperative specimen mammogram was performed during all consecutive conservative resections for nonpalpable DCIS and a 15-mm radiological margin was considered “adequate”. Margins were pathologically assessed and classified as “negative”, “close” or “positive” and the rate of margin involvement constitued the main outcome of the study. Among 272 conservative interventions, 80.51% had negative margins at final pathology, 3.31% had close margins and 16.18% had positive margins. An intraoperative “adequate” margin of 15 mm as defined on intraoperative specimen mammogram granted a high rate of histologically negative margin at primary surgery; this finding was paralleled by confirmation of the treatment as conservative in 95% of cases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-243) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2013-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3669500/ /pubmed/23741658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-243 Text en © Buggi et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Buggi, Federico Mingozzi, Matteo Curcio, Annalisa Rossi, Camilla Nanni, Oriana Bedei, Lucia Sanna, Paola A Veltri, Salvatore Folli, Secondo Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate |
title | Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate |
title_full | Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate |
title_fullStr | Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate |
title_full_unstemmed | Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate |
title_short | Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate |
title_sort | intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable dcis: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3669500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23741658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buggifederico intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate AT mingozzimatteo intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate AT curcioannalisa intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate AT rossicamilla intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate AT nannioriana intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate AT bedeilucia intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate AT sannapaolaa intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate AT veltrisalvatore intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate AT follisecondo intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate |