Cargando…

Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate

What constitutes an adequate surgical margin in partial mastectomy is still controversial: intra-operative specimen radiogram is commonly used during partial mastectomy for nonpalpable lesions in order verify the adequacy of the resection but what margin is to be considered “adequate” is still debat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buggi, Federico, Mingozzi, Matteo, Curcio, Annalisa, Rossi, Camilla, Nanni, Oriana, Bedei, Lucia, Sanna, Paola A, Veltri, Salvatore, Folli, Secondo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3669500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23741658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-243
_version_ 1782271765052915712
author Buggi, Federico
Mingozzi, Matteo
Curcio, Annalisa
Rossi, Camilla
Nanni, Oriana
Bedei, Lucia
Sanna, Paola A
Veltri, Salvatore
Folli, Secondo
author_facet Buggi, Federico
Mingozzi, Matteo
Curcio, Annalisa
Rossi, Camilla
Nanni, Oriana
Bedei, Lucia
Sanna, Paola A
Veltri, Salvatore
Folli, Secondo
author_sort Buggi, Federico
collection PubMed
description What constitutes an adequate surgical margin in partial mastectomy is still controversial: intra-operative specimen radiogram is commonly used during partial mastectomy for nonpalpable lesions in order verify the adequacy of the resection but what margin is to be considered “adequate” is still debatable. An intraoperative specimen mammogram was performed during all consecutive conservative resections for nonpalpable DCIS and a 15-mm radiological margin was considered “adequate”. Margins were pathologically assessed and classified as “negative”, “close” or “positive” and the rate of margin involvement constitued the main outcome of the study. Among 272 conservative interventions, 80.51% had negative margins at final pathology, 3.31% had close margins and 16.18% had positive margins. An intraoperative “adequate” margin of 15 mm as defined on intraoperative specimen mammogram granted a high rate of histologically negative margin at primary surgery; this finding was paralleled by confirmation of the treatment as conservative in 95% of cases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-243) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3669500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36695002013-06-03 Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate Buggi, Federico Mingozzi, Matteo Curcio, Annalisa Rossi, Camilla Nanni, Oriana Bedei, Lucia Sanna, Paola A Veltri, Salvatore Folli, Secondo Springerplus Research What constitutes an adequate surgical margin in partial mastectomy is still controversial: intra-operative specimen radiogram is commonly used during partial mastectomy for nonpalpable lesions in order verify the adequacy of the resection but what margin is to be considered “adequate” is still debatable. An intraoperative specimen mammogram was performed during all consecutive conservative resections for nonpalpable DCIS and a 15-mm radiological margin was considered “adequate”. Margins were pathologically assessed and classified as “negative”, “close” or “positive” and the rate of margin involvement constitued the main outcome of the study. Among 272 conservative interventions, 80.51% had negative margins at final pathology, 3.31% had close margins and 16.18% had positive margins. An intraoperative “adequate” margin of 15 mm as defined on intraoperative specimen mammogram granted a high rate of histologically negative margin at primary surgery; this finding was paralleled by confirmation of the treatment as conservative in 95% of cases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-243) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2013-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3669500/ /pubmed/23741658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-243 Text en © Buggi et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Buggi, Federico
Mingozzi, Matteo
Curcio, Annalisa
Rossi, Camilla
Nanni, Oriana
Bedei, Lucia
Sanna, Paola A
Veltri, Salvatore
Folli, Secondo
Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate
title Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate
title_full Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate
title_fullStr Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate
title_full_unstemmed Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate
title_short Intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable DCIS: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate
title_sort intra-operative radiological margins assessment in conservative treatment for non-palpable dcis: correlation to pathological examination and re-excision rate
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3669500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23741658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-243
work_keys_str_mv AT buggifederico intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate
AT mingozzimatteo intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate
AT curcioannalisa intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate
AT rossicamilla intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate
AT nannioriana intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate
AT bedeilucia intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate
AT sannapaolaa intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate
AT veltrisalvatore intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate
AT follisecondo intraoperativeradiologicalmarginsassessmentinconservativetreatmentfornonpalpabledciscorrelationtopathologicalexaminationandreexcisionrate