Cargando…
Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosis
BACKGROUND: Outcome reporting bias (ORB) in randomised trials has been identified as a threat to the validity of systematic reviews. Previous work highlighting this problem is limited to considering a single primary review outcome. The aim of this study was to assess ORB across all efficacy outcomes...
Autores principales: | Dwan, Kerry, Kirkham, Jamie J, Williamson, Paula R, Gamble, Carrol |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3669728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23794538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002709 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Shah, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Impact of levothyroxine therapy on obstetric, neonatal and childhood outcomes in women with subclinical hypothyroidism diagnosed in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
por: Yamamoto, Jennifer M, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Frailty measurement and outcomes in interventional studies: protocol for a systematic review of randomised control trials
por: Shears, Melissa, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
por: Fletcher, Ben, et al.
Publicado: (2012)