Cargando…
Do general intellectual functioning and socioeconomic status account for performance on the Children's Gambling Task?
Studies that use the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and its age-appropriate versions as indices of affective decision-making during childhood and adolescence have demonstrated significant individual differences in scores. Our study investigated the association between general intellectual functioning and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3669750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23760222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00068 |
_version_ | 1782271799956865024 |
---|---|
author | Mata, Fernanda Sallum, Isabela Miranda, Débora M. Bechara, Antoine Malloy-Diniz, Leandro F. |
author_facet | Mata, Fernanda Sallum, Isabela Miranda, Débora M. Bechara, Antoine Malloy-Diniz, Leandro F. |
author_sort | Mata, Fernanda |
collection | PubMed |
description | Studies that use the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and its age-appropriate versions as indices of affective decision-making during childhood and adolescence have demonstrated significant individual differences in scores. Our study investigated the association between general intellectual functioning and socioeconomic status (SES) and its effect on the development of affective decision-making in preschoolers by using a computerized version of the Children's Gambling Task (CGT). We administered the CGT and the Columbia Mental Maturity Scale (CMMS) to 137 Brazilian children between the ages of 3 and 5 years old to assess their general intellectual functioning. We also used the Brazilian Criterion of Economic Classification (CCEB) to assess their SES. Age differences between 3- and 4-years-old, but not between 4- and 5-years-old, confirmed the results obtained by Kerr and Zelazo (2004), indicating the rapid development of affective decision-making during the preschool period. Both 4- and 5-years-old performed significantly above chance on blocks 3, 4, and 5 of the CGT, whereas 3-years-old mean scores did not differ from chance. We found that general intellectual functioning was not related to affective decision-making. On the other hand, our findings showed that children with high SES performed better on the last block of the CGT in comparison to children with low SES, which indicates that children from the former group seem more likely to use the information about the gain/loss aspects of the decks to efficiently choose cards from the advantageous deck throughout the task. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3669750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36697502013-06-11 Do general intellectual functioning and socioeconomic status account for performance on the Children's Gambling Task? Mata, Fernanda Sallum, Isabela Miranda, Débora M. Bechara, Antoine Malloy-Diniz, Leandro F. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Studies that use the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and its age-appropriate versions as indices of affective decision-making during childhood and adolescence have demonstrated significant individual differences in scores. Our study investigated the association between general intellectual functioning and socioeconomic status (SES) and its effect on the development of affective decision-making in preschoolers by using a computerized version of the Children's Gambling Task (CGT). We administered the CGT and the Columbia Mental Maturity Scale (CMMS) to 137 Brazilian children between the ages of 3 and 5 years old to assess their general intellectual functioning. We also used the Brazilian Criterion of Economic Classification (CCEB) to assess their SES. Age differences between 3- and 4-years-old, but not between 4- and 5-years-old, confirmed the results obtained by Kerr and Zelazo (2004), indicating the rapid development of affective decision-making during the preschool period. Both 4- and 5-years-old performed significantly above chance on blocks 3, 4, and 5 of the CGT, whereas 3-years-old mean scores did not differ from chance. We found that general intellectual functioning was not related to affective decision-making. On the other hand, our findings showed that children with high SES performed better on the last block of the CGT in comparison to children with low SES, which indicates that children from the former group seem more likely to use the information about the gain/loss aspects of the decks to efficiently choose cards from the advantageous deck throughout the task. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3669750/ /pubmed/23760222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00068 Text en Copyright © 2013 Mata, Sallum, Miranda, Bechara and Malloy-Diniz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Mata, Fernanda Sallum, Isabela Miranda, Débora M. Bechara, Antoine Malloy-Diniz, Leandro F. Do general intellectual functioning and socioeconomic status account for performance on the Children's Gambling Task? |
title | Do general intellectual functioning and socioeconomic status account for performance on the Children's Gambling Task? |
title_full | Do general intellectual functioning and socioeconomic status account for performance on the Children's Gambling Task? |
title_fullStr | Do general intellectual functioning and socioeconomic status account for performance on the Children's Gambling Task? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do general intellectual functioning and socioeconomic status account for performance on the Children's Gambling Task? |
title_short | Do general intellectual functioning and socioeconomic status account for performance on the Children's Gambling Task? |
title_sort | do general intellectual functioning and socioeconomic status account for performance on the children's gambling task? |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3669750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23760222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matafernanda dogeneralintellectualfunctioningandsocioeconomicstatusaccountforperformanceonthechildrensgamblingtask AT sallumisabela dogeneralintellectualfunctioningandsocioeconomicstatusaccountforperformanceonthechildrensgamblingtask AT mirandadeboram dogeneralintellectualfunctioningandsocioeconomicstatusaccountforperformanceonthechildrensgamblingtask AT becharaantoine dogeneralintellectualfunctioningandsocioeconomicstatusaccountforperformanceonthechildrensgamblingtask AT malloydinizleandrof dogeneralintellectualfunctioningandsocioeconomicstatusaccountforperformanceonthechildrensgamblingtask |