Cargando…
Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary?
In this commentary, we discuss how our recent paper by Yang et al. contributes a new wrinkle to the already somewhat curious Wnt signaling pathway in C. elegans. We begin with a historical perspective on the Wnt pathway in the worm, followed by a summary of the key salient point from Yang et al., 20...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Landes Bioscience
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3670178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24058829 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/worm.19156 |
_version_ | 1782271817949380608 |
---|---|
author | Robertson, Scott M. Lin, Rueyling |
author_facet | Robertson, Scott M. Lin, Rueyling |
author_sort | Robertson, Scott M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this commentary, we discuss how our recent paper by Yang et al. contributes a new wrinkle to the already somewhat curious Wnt signaling pathway in C. elegans. We begin with a historical perspective on the Wnt pathway in the worm, followed by a summary of the key salient point from Yang et al., 2011, namely demonstration of mutually inhibitory binding of a β-catenin SYS-1 to the N-terminus and another β-catenin WRM-1 to the C-terminus of the TCF protein POP-1, and a plausible structural explanation for these differential binding specificities. The mutually inhibitory binding creates one population of POP-1 that is bound by WRM-1, phosphorylated by the NLK kinase and exported from the nucleus, and another bound by coactivator SYS-1 that remains in the nucleus. We speculate on the evolutionary history of the four β-catenins in C. elegans and suggest a possible link between multiple β-catenin gene duplications and the requirement to reduce nuclear POP-1 levels to activate Wnt target genes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3670178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Landes Bioscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36701782013-09-19 Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary? Robertson, Scott M. Lin, Rueyling Worm Commentary In this commentary, we discuss how our recent paper by Yang et al. contributes a new wrinkle to the already somewhat curious Wnt signaling pathway in C. elegans. We begin with a historical perspective on the Wnt pathway in the worm, followed by a summary of the key salient point from Yang et al., 2011, namely demonstration of mutually inhibitory binding of a β-catenin SYS-1 to the N-terminus and another β-catenin WRM-1 to the C-terminus of the TCF protein POP-1, and a plausible structural explanation for these differential binding specificities. The mutually inhibitory binding creates one population of POP-1 that is bound by WRM-1, phosphorylated by the NLK kinase and exported from the nucleus, and another bound by coactivator SYS-1 that remains in the nucleus. We speculate on the evolutionary history of the four β-catenins in C. elegans and suggest a possible link between multiple β-catenin gene duplications and the requirement to reduce nuclear POP-1 levels to activate Wnt target genes. Landes Bioscience 2012-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3670178/ /pubmed/24058829 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/worm.19156 Text en Copyright © 2012 Landes Bioscience http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Robertson, Scott M. Lin, Rueyling Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary? |
title | Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary? |
title_full | Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary? |
title_fullStr | Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary? |
title_full_unstemmed | Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary? |
title_short | Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary? |
title_sort | our evolving view of wnt signaling in c. elegans: if two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3670178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24058829 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/worm.19156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsonscottm ourevolvingviewofwntsignalingincelegansiftwoscompanyandthreesacrowdisfourreallynecessary AT linrueyling ourevolvingviewofwntsignalingincelegansiftwoscompanyandthreesacrowdisfourreallynecessary |