Cargando…

Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary?

In this commentary, we discuss how our recent paper by Yang et al. contributes a new wrinkle to the already somewhat curious Wnt signaling pathway in C. elegans. We begin with a historical perspective on the Wnt pathway in the worm, followed by a summary of the key salient point from Yang et al., 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robertson, Scott M., Lin, Rueyling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Landes Bioscience 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3670178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24058829
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/worm.19156
_version_ 1782271817949380608
author Robertson, Scott M.
Lin, Rueyling
author_facet Robertson, Scott M.
Lin, Rueyling
author_sort Robertson, Scott M.
collection PubMed
description In this commentary, we discuss how our recent paper by Yang et al. contributes a new wrinkle to the already somewhat curious Wnt signaling pathway in C. elegans. We begin with a historical perspective on the Wnt pathway in the worm, followed by a summary of the key salient point from Yang et al., 2011, namely demonstration of mutually inhibitory binding of a β-catenin SYS-1 to the N-terminus and another β-catenin WRM-1 to the C-terminus of the TCF protein POP-1, and a plausible structural explanation for these differential binding specificities. The mutually inhibitory binding creates one population of POP-1 that is bound by WRM-1, phosphorylated by the NLK kinase and exported from the nucleus, and another bound by coactivator SYS-1 that remains in the nucleus. We speculate on the evolutionary history of the four β-catenins in C. elegans and suggest a possible link between multiple β-catenin gene duplications and the requirement to reduce nuclear POP-1 levels to activate Wnt target genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3670178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Landes Bioscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36701782013-09-19 Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary? Robertson, Scott M. Lin, Rueyling Worm Commentary In this commentary, we discuss how our recent paper by Yang et al. contributes a new wrinkle to the already somewhat curious Wnt signaling pathway in C. elegans. We begin with a historical perspective on the Wnt pathway in the worm, followed by a summary of the key salient point from Yang et al., 2011, namely demonstration of mutually inhibitory binding of a β-catenin SYS-1 to the N-terminus and another β-catenin WRM-1 to the C-terminus of the TCF protein POP-1, and a plausible structural explanation for these differential binding specificities. The mutually inhibitory binding creates one population of POP-1 that is bound by WRM-1, phosphorylated by the NLK kinase and exported from the nucleus, and another bound by coactivator SYS-1 that remains in the nucleus. We speculate on the evolutionary history of the four β-catenins in C. elegans and suggest a possible link between multiple β-catenin gene duplications and the requirement to reduce nuclear POP-1 levels to activate Wnt target genes. Landes Bioscience 2012-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3670178/ /pubmed/24058829 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/worm.19156 Text en Copyright © 2012 Landes Bioscience http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Robertson, Scott M.
Lin, Rueyling
Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary?
title Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary?
title_full Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary?
title_fullStr Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary?
title_full_unstemmed Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary?
title_short Our evolving view of Wnt signaling in C. elegans: If two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary?
title_sort our evolving view of wnt signaling in c. elegans: if two’s company and three’s a crowd, is four really necessary?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3670178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24058829
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/worm.19156
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsonscottm ourevolvingviewofwntsignalingincelegansiftwoscompanyandthreesacrowdisfourreallynecessary
AT linrueyling ourevolvingviewofwntsignalingincelegansiftwoscompanyandthreesacrowdisfourreallynecessary