Cargando…

High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment

Psychopathy is a personality disorder frequently associated with immoral behaviors. Previous behavioral studies on the influence of psychopathy on moral decision have yielded contradictory results, possibly because they focused either on judgment (abstract evaluation) or on choice of hypothetical ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tassy, Sébastien, Deruelle, Christine, Mancini, Julien, Leistedt, Samuel, Wicker, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761743
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00229
_version_ 1782271939604119552
author Tassy, Sébastien
Deruelle, Christine
Mancini, Julien
Leistedt, Samuel
Wicker, Bruno
author_facet Tassy, Sébastien
Deruelle, Christine
Mancini, Julien
Leistedt, Samuel
Wicker, Bruno
author_sort Tassy, Sébastien
collection PubMed
description Psychopathy is a personality disorder frequently associated with immoral behaviors. Previous behavioral studies on the influence of psychopathy on moral decision have yielded contradictory results, possibly because they focused either on judgment (abstract evaluation) or on choice of hypothetical action, two processes that may rely on different mechanisms. In this study, we explored the influence of the level of psychopathic traits on judgment and choice of hypothetical action during moral dilemma evaluation. A population of 102 students completed a questionnaire with ten moral dilemmas and nine non-moral dilemmas. The task included questions targeting both judgment (“Is it acceptable to … in order to …?”) and choice of hypothetical action (“Would you … in order to …?”). The level of psychopathic traits of each participant was evaluated with the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy (LSRP) scale. Logistic regression fitted with the generalized estimating equations method analyses were conducted using responses to the judgment and choice tasks as the dependent variables and psychopathy scores as predictor. Results show that a high level of psychopathic traits, and more specifically those related to affective deficit, predicted a greater proportion of utilitarian responses for the choice but not for the judgment question. There was no first-order interaction between the level of psychopathic traits and other potential predictors. The relation between a high level of psychopathic traits and increased utilitarianism in choice of action but not in moral judgment may explain the contradictory results of previous studies where these two processes were not contrasted. It also gives further support to the hypothesis that choice of action endorsement and abstract judgment during moral dilemma evaluation are partially distinct neural and psychological processes. We propose that this distinction should be better taken into account in the evaluation of psychopathic behaviors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3671176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36711762013-06-11 High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment Tassy, Sébastien Deruelle, Christine Mancini, Julien Leistedt, Samuel Wicker, Bruno Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Psychopathy is a personality disorder frequently associated with immoral behaviors. Previous behavioral studies on the influence of psychopathy on moral decision have yielded contradictory results, possibly because they focused either on judgment (abstract evaluation) or on choice of hypothetical action, two processes that may rely on different mechanisms. In this study, we explored the influence of the level of psychopathic traits on judgment and choice of hypothetical action during moral dilemma evaluation. A population of 102 students completed a questionnaire with ten moral dilemmas and nine non-moral dilemmas. The task included questions targeting both judgment (“Is it acceptable to … in order to …?”) and choice of hypothetical action (“Would you … in order to …?”). The level of psychopathic traits of each participant was evaluated with the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy (LSRP) scale. Logistic regression fitted with the generalized estimating equations method analyses were conducted using responses to the judgment and choice tasks as the dependent variables and psychopathy scores as predictor. Results show that a high level of psychopathic traits, and more specifically those related to affective deficit, predicted a greater proportion of utilitarian responses for the choice but not for the judgment question. There was no first-order interaction between the level of psychopathic traits and other potential predictors. The relation between a high level of psychopathic traits and increased utilitarianism in choice of action but not in moral judgment may explain the contradictory results of previous studies where these two processes were not contrasted. It also gives further support to the hypothesis that choice of action endorsement and abstract judgment during moral dilemma evaluation are partially distinct neural and psychological processes. We propose that this distinction should be better taken into account in the evaluation of psychopathic behaviors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3671176/ /pubmed/23761743 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00229 Text en Copyright © 2013 Tassy, Deruelle, Mancini, Leistedt and Wicker. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Tassy, Sébastien
Deruelle, Christine
Mancini, Julien
Leistedt, Samuel
Wicker, Bruno
High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment
title High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment
title_full High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment
title_fullStr High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment
title_full_unstemmed High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment
title_short High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment
title_sort high levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761743
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00229
work_keys_str_mv AT tassysebastien highlevelsofpsychopathictraitsaltersmoralchoicebutnotmoraljudgment
AT deruellechristine highlevelsofpsychopathictraitsaltersmoralchoicebutnotmoraljudgment
AT mancinijulien highlevelsofpsychopathictraitsaltersmoralchoicebutnotmoraljudgment
AT leistedtsamuel highlevelsofpsychopathictraitsaltersmoralchoicebutnotmoraljudgment
AT wickerbruno highlevelsofpsychopathictraitsaltersmoralchoicebutnotmoraljudgment