Cargando…
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a photosensitive polyimide thin-film microelectrode array suitable for epiretinal stimulation
BACKGROUND: Epiretinal implants based on microelectro-mechanical system (MEMS) technology with a polyimide (PI) material are being proposed for application. Many kinds of non-photosensitive PIs have good biocompatibility and stability as typical MEMS materials for implantable electrodes. However, th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23718827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-48 |
_version_ | 1782271955486900224 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Xia Sui, Xiaohong Lu, Yiliang Yan, Yan Zhou, Chuanqing Li, Liming Ren, Qiushi Chai, Xinyu |
author_facet | Jiang, Xia Sui, Xiaohong Lu, Yiliang Yan, Yan Zhou, Chuanqing Li, Liming Ren, Qiushi Chai, Xinyu |
author_sort | Jiang, Xia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Epiretinal implants based on microelectro-mechanical system (MEMS) technology with a polyimide (PI) material are being proposed for application. Many kinds of non-photosensitive PIs have good biocompatibility and stability as typical MEMS materials for implantable electrodes. However, the effects of MEMS microfabrication, sterilization and implantation using a photosensitive polyimide (PSPI) microelectrode array for epiretinal electrical stimulation has not been extensively examined. METHODS: A novel PSPI (Durimide 7510) microelectrode array for epiretinal electrical stimulation was designed, fabricated based on MEMS processing and microfabrication techniques. The biocompatibility of our new microelectrode was tested in vitro using an MTT assay and direct contact tests between the microelectrode surface and cells. Electrochemical impedance characteristics were tested based on a three-electrode testing method. The reliability and stability was evaluated by a chronic implantation of a non-functional array within the rabbit eye. Histological examination and SEM were performed to monitor possible damage of the retina and microelectrodes. Electrically evoked potentials (EEPs) were recorded during the acute stimulation of the retina. RESULTS: The substrate was made of PSPI and the electrode material was platinum (Pt). The PSPI microelectrode array showed good biocompatibility and appropriate impedance characteristics for epiretinal stimulation. After a 6-month epiretinal implantation in the eyes of rabbits, we found no local retinal toxicity and no mechanical compression caused by the array. The Pt electrodes adhesion to the PSPI remained stable. A response to electrical stimuli was with recording electrodes lying on the visual cortex. CONCLUSION: We provide a relevant design and fundamental characteristics of a PSPI microelectrode array. Strong evidences on testing indicate that implantation is safe in terms of mechanical pressure and biocompatibility of PSPI microelectrode arrays on the retina. The dual-layer process we used proffers considerable advantages over the more traditional single-layer approach and can accommodate much many electrode sites. This lays the groundwork for a future, high-resolution retinal prosthesis with many more electrode sites based on the flexible PSPI thin film substrate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3671245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36712452013-06-10 In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a photosensitive polyimide thin-film microelectrode array suitable for epiretinal stimulation Jiang, Xia Sui, Xiaohong Lu, Yiliang Yan, Yan Zhou, Chuanqing Li, Liming Ren, Qiushi Chai, Xinyu J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Epiretinal implants based on microelectro-mechanical system (MEMS) technology with a polyimide (PI) material are being proposed for application. Many kinds of non-photosensitive PIs have good biocompatibility and stability as typical MEMS materials for implantable electrodes. However, the effects of MEMS microfabrication, sterilization and implantation using a photosensitive polyimide (PSPI) microelectrode array for epiretinal electrical stimulation has not been extensively examined. METHODS: A novel PSPI (Durimide 7510) microelectrode array for epiretinal electrical stimulation was designed, fabricated based on MEMS processing and microfabrication techniques. The biocompatibility of our new microelectrode was tested in vitro using an MTT assay and direct contact tests between the microelectrode surface and cells. Electrochemical impedance characteristics were tested based on a three-electrode testing method. The reliability and stability was evaluated by a chronic implantation of a non-functional array within the rabbit eye. Histological examination and SEM were performed to monitor possible damage of the retina and microelectrodes. Electrically evoked potentials (EEPs) were recorded during the acute stimulation of the retina. RESULTS: The substrate was made of PSPI and the electrode material was platinum (Pt). The PSPI microelectrode array showed good biocompatibility and appropriate impedance characteristics for epiretinal stimulation. After a 6-month epiretinal implantation in the eyes of rabbits, we found no local retinal toxicity and no mechanical compression caused by the array. The Pt electrodes adhesion to the PSPI remained stable. A response to electrical stimuli was with recording electrodes lying on the visual cortex. CONCLUSION: We provide a relevant design and fundamental characteristics of a PSPI microelectrode array. Strong evidences on testing indicate that implantation is safe in terms of mechanical pressure and biocompatibility of PSPI microelectrode arrays on the retina. The dual-layer process we used proffers considerable advantages over the more traditional single-layer approach and can accommodate much many electrode sites. This lays the groundwork for a future, high-resolution retinal prosthesis with many more electrode sites based on the flexible PSPI thin film substrate. BioMed Central 2013-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3671245/ /pubmed/23718827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-48 Text en Copyright © 2013 Jiang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Jiang, Xia Sui, Xiaohong Lu, Yiliang Yan, Yan Zhou, Chuanqing Li, Liming Ren, Qiushi Chai, Xinyu In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a photosensitive polyimide thin-film microelectrode array suitable for epiretinal stimulation |
title | In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a photosensitive polyimide thin-film microelectrode array suitable for epiretinal stimulation |
title_full | In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a photosensitive polyimide thin-film microelectrode array suitable for epiretinal stimulation |
title_fullStr | In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a photosensitive polyimide thin-film microelectrode array suitable for epiretinal stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a photosensitive polyimide thin-film microelectrode array suitable for epiretinal stimulation |
title_short | In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a photosensitive polyimide thin-film microelectrode array suitable for epiretinal stimulation |
title_sort | in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a photosensitive polyimide thin-film microelectrode array suitable for epiretinal stimulation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23718827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-48 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangxia invitroandinvivoevaluationofaphotosensitivepolyimidethinfilmmicroelectrodearraysuitableforepiretinalstimulation AT suixiaohong invitroandinvivoevaluationofaphotosensitivepolyimidethinfilmmicroelectrodearraysuitableforepiretinalstimulation AT luyiliang invitroandinvivoevaluationofaphotosensitivepolyimidethinfilmmicroelectrodearraysuitableforepiretinalstimulation AT yanyan invitroandinvivoevaluationofaphotosensitivepolyimidethinfilmmicroelectrodearraysuitableforepiretinalstimulation AT zhouchuanqing invitroandinvivoevaluationofaphotosensitivepolyimidethinfilmmicroelectrodearraysuitableforepiretinalstimulation AT liliming invitroandinvivoevaluationofaphotosensitivepolyimidethinfilmmicroelectrodearraysuitableforepiretinalstimulation AT renqiushi invitroandinvivoevaluationofaphotosensitivepolyimidethinfilmmicroelectrodearraysuitableforepiretinalstimulation AT chaixinyu invitroandinvivoevaluationofaphotosensitivepolyimidethinfilmmicroelectrodearraysuitableforepiretinalstimulation |