Cargando…

Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT

Background. Postoperative imaging after cochlear implantation is usually performed by conventional cochlear view (X-ray) or by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). MSCT after cochlear implantation often provides multiple metal artefacts; thus, a more detailed view of the implant considering the gi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana, Mönninghoff, Christoph, Greve, Jens, Hoffmann, Thomas, Göricke, Sophia, Arnolds, Judith, Theysohn, Nina, Gollner, Ulrich, Lang, Stephan, Forsting, Michael, Schlamann, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scholarly Research Network 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762618
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/728205
_version_ 1782272025278021632
author Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana
Mönninghoff, Christoph
Greve, Jens
Hoffmann, Thomas
Göricke, Sophia
Arnolds, Judith
Theysohn, Nina
Gollner, Ulrich
Lang, Stephan
Forsting, Michael
Schlamann, Marc
author_facet Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana
Mönninghoff, Christoph
Greve, Jens
Hoffmann, Thomas
Göricke, Sophia
Arnolds, Judith
Theysohn, Nina
Gollner, Ulrich
Lang, Stephan
Forsting, Michael
Schlamann, Marc
author_sort Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana
collection PubMed
description Background. Postoperative imaging after cochlear implantation is usually performed by conventional cochlear view (X-ray) or by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). MSCT after cochlear implantation often provides multiple metal artefacts; thus, a more detailed view of the implant considering the given anatomy is desirable. A quite new method is flat panel volume computed tomography. The aim of the study was to evaluate the method's clinical use. Material and Methods. After cochlear implantation with different implant types, flat panel CT scan (Philips Allura) was performed in 31 adult patients. Anatomical details, positioning, and resolution of the different electrode types (MedEL, Advanced Bionics, and Cochlear) were evaluated interdisciplinary (ENT/Neuroradiology). Results. In all 31 patients cochlear implant electrode array and topographical position could be distinguished exactly. Spatial resolution and the high degree of accuracy were superior to reported results of MSCT. Differentiation of cochlear scalae by identification of the osseous spiral lamina was possible in some cases. Scanning artefacts were low. Conclusion. Flat panel CT scan allows exact imaging independent of implant type. This is mandatory for detailed information on cochlear electrode position. It enables us to perform optimal auditory nerve stimulation and allows feed back on surgical quality concerning the method of electrode insertion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3671709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher International Scholarly Research Network
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36717092013-06-12 Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana Mönninghoff, Christoph Greve, Jens Hoffmann, Thomas Göricke, Sophia Arnolds, Judith Theysohn, Nina Gollner, Ulrich Lang, Stephan Forsting, Michael Schlamann, Marc ISRN Otolaryngol Clinical Study Background. Postoperative imaging after cochlear implantation is usually performed by conventional cochlear view (X-ray) or by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). MSCT after cochlear implantation often provides multiple metal artefacts; thus, a more detailed view of the implant considering the given anatomy is desirable. A quite new method is flat panel volume computed tomography. The aim of the study was to evaluate the method's clinical use. Material and Methods. After cochlear implantation with different implant types, flat panel CT scan (Philips Allura) was performed in 31 adult patients. Anatomical details, positioning, and resolution of the different electrode types (MedEL, Advanced Bionics, and Cochlear) were evaluated interdisciplinary (ENT/Neuroradiology). Results. In all 31 patients cochlear implant electrode array and topographical position could be distinguished exactly. Spatial resolution and the high degree of accuracy were superior to reported results of MSCT. Differentiation of cochlear scalae by identification of the osseous spiral lamina was possible in some cases. Scanning artefacts were low. Conclusion. Flat panel CT scan allows exact imaging independent of implant type. This is mandatory for detailed information on cochlear electrode position. It enables us to perform optimal auditory nerve stimulation and allows feed back on surgical quality concerning the method of electrode insertion. International Scholarly Research Network 2012-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3671709/ /pubmed/23762618 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/728205 Text en Copyright © 2012 Diana Arweiler-Harbeck et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana
Mönninghoff, Christoph
Greve, Jens
Hoffmann, Thomas
Göricke, Sophia
Arnolds, Judith
Theysohn, Nina
Gollner, Ulrich
Lang, Stephan
Forsting, Michael
Schlamann, Marc
Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT
title Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT
title_full Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT
title_fullStr Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT
title_full_unstemmed Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT
title_short Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT
title_sort imaging of electrode position after cochlear implantation with flat panel ct
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762618
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/728205
work_keys_str_mv AT arweilerharbeckdiana imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct
AT monninghoffchristoph imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct
AT grevejens imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct
AT hoffmannthomas imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct
AT gorickesophia imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct
AT arnoldsjudith imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct
AT theysohnnina imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct
AT gollnerulrich imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct
AT langstephan imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct
AT forstingmichael imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct
AT schlamannmarc imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct