Cargando…
Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT
Background. Postoperative imaging after cochlear implantation is usually performed by conventional cochlear view (X-ray) or by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). MSCT after cochlear implantation often provides multiple metal artefacts; thus, a more detailed view of the implant considering the gi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scholarly Research Network
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762618 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/728205 |
_version_ | 1782272025278021632 |
---|---|
author | Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana Mönninghoff, Christoph Greve, Jens Hoffmann, Thomas Göricke, Sophia Arnolds, Judith Theysohn, Nina Gollner, Ulrich Lang, Stephan Forsting, Michael Schlamann, Marc |
author_facet | Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana Mönninghoff, Christoph Greve, Jens Hoffmann, Thomas Göricke, Sophia Arnolds, Judith Theysohn, Nina Gollner, Ulrich Lang, Stephan Forsting, Michael Schlamann, Marc |
author_sort | Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Postoperative imaging after cochlear implantation is usually performed by conventional cochlear view (X-ray) or by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). MSCT after cochlear implantation often provides multiple metal artefacts; thus, a more detailed view of the implant considering the given anatomy is desirable. A quite new method is flat panel volume computed tomography. The aim of the study was to evaluate the method's clinical use. Material and Methods. After cochlear implantation with different implant types, flat panel CT scan (Philips Allura) was performed in 31 adult patients. Anatomical details, positioning, and resolution of the different electrode types (MedEL, Advanced Bionics, and Cochlear) were evaluated interdisciplinary (ENT/Neuroradiology). Results. In all 31 patients cochlear implant electrode array and topographical position could be distinguished exactly. Spatial resolution and the high degree of accuracy were superior to reported results of MSCT. Differentiation of cochlear scalae by identification of the osseous spiral lamina was possible in some cases. Scanning artefacts were low. Conclusion. Flat panel CT scan allows exact imaging independent of implant type. This is mandatory for detailed information on cochlear electrode position. It enables us to perform optimal auditory nerve stimulation and allows feed back on surgical quality concerning the method of electrode insertion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3671709 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | International Scholarly Research Network |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36717092013-06-12 Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana Mönninghoff, Christoph Greve, Jens Hoffmann, Thomas Göricke, Sophia Arnolds, Judith Theysohn, Nina Gollner, Ulrich Lang, Stephan Forsting, Michael Schlamann, Marc ISRN Otolaryngol Clinical Study Background. Postoperative imaging after cochlear implantation is usually performed by conventional cochlear view (X-ray) or by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). MSCT after cochlear implantation often provides multiple metal artefacts; thus, a more detailed view of the implant considering the given anatomy is desirable. A quite new method is flat panel volume computed tomography. The aim of the study was to evaluate the method's clinical use. Material and Methods. After cochlear implantation with different implant types, flat panel CT scan (Philips Allura) was performed in 31 adult patients. Anatomical details, positioning, and resolution of the different electrode types (MedEL, Advanced Bionics, and Cochlear) were evaluated interdisciplinary (ENT/Neuroradiology). Results. In all 31 patients cochlear implant electrode array and topographical position could be distinguished exactly. Spatial resolution and the high degree of accuracy were superior to reported results of MSCT. Differentiation of cochlear scalae by identification of the osseous spiral lamina was possible in some cases. Scanning artefacts were low. Conclusion. Flat panel CT scan allows exact imaging independent of implant type. This is mandatory for detailed information on cochlear electrode position. It enables us to perform optimal auditory nerve stimulation and allows feed back on surgical quality concerning the method of electrode insertion. International Scholarly Research Network 2012-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3671709/ /pubmed/23762618 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/728205 Text en Copyright © 2012 Diana Arweiler-Harbeck et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana Mönninghoff, Christoph Greve, Jens Hoffmann, Thomas Göricke, Sophia Arnolds, Judith Theysohn, Nina Gollner, Ulrich Lang, Stephan Forsting, Michael Schlamann, Marc Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT |
title | Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT |
title_full | Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT |
title_fullStr | Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT |
title_short | Imaging of Electrode Position after Cochlear Implantation with Flat Panel CT |
title_sort | imaging of electrode position after cochlear implantation with flat panel ct |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762618 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/728205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arweilerharbeckdiana imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct AT monninghoffchristoph imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct AT grevejens imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct AT hoffmannthomas imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct AT gorickesophia imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct AT arnoldsjudith imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct AT theysohnnina imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct AT gollnerulrich imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct AT langstephan imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct AT forstingmichael imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct AT schlamannmarc imagingofelectrodepositionaftercochlearimplantationwithflatpanelct |